School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-3701, USA.
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Aug;41(4):831-47. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9950-6. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
We addressed several issues concerning children who show gender non-normative (GNN) patterns of peer play. First, do young children with GNN peer preferences differ from children with gender normative (GN) peer preferences in problem behaviors? Second, do GNN and GN children differ in sociability and isolation and do they have differential socialization opportunities with externalizing, internalizing, and socially competent peers? We employed a Bayesian approach for classifying children as GNN based on their peer preferences as compared to their peers using a sample of Head Start preschool children from a large Southwestern city (N = 257; 53 % boys; M age = 51 months; 66 % Mexican American). To calculate socialization opportunities, we assessed affiliation to each child in the class and weighted that by each peer's characteristics to determine the exposure that each child had to different kinds of peers. GN children of both sexes interacted more with same-sex peers, which may limit learning of different styles of interaction. As compared to GN children, GNN children exhibited more engagement in other-sex activities and with other-sex play partners and GNN children experienced somewhat fewer peer interactions, but did not differ on problem behaviors or social competence. Boys with GNN peer preferences had increased exposure to peers with problem behaviors. GNN girls experienced little exposure to peers with problem behaviors, but they also had little exposure to socially competent peers, which may reduce learning social skills from peers. Implications of these findings for future socialization and development will be discussed.
我们解决了一些涉及表现出性别非规范(GNN)同伴游戏模式的儿童的问题。首先,具有 GNN 同伴偏好的幼儿与具有性别规范(GN)同伴偏好的幼儿在行为问题上是否存在差异?其次,GNN 和 GN 儿童在社交性和孤立性方面是否存在差异,他们与外化、内化和社交能力强的同伴是否有不同的社会化机会?我们采用贝叶斯方法,根据幼儿的同伴偏好将其分类为 GNN,与他们在西南大城市的 Head Start 学前儿童样本中的同伴进行比较(N=257;53%为男孩;M 年龄=51 个月;66%为墨西哥裔美国人)。为了计算社会化机会,我们评估了每个孩子在班级中的亲密度,并根据每个同伴的特点对其进行加权,以确定每个孩子与不同类型的同伴接触的机会。性别为 GN 的男孩和女孩与同性同伴的互动更多,这可能限制了不同互动方式的学习。与 GN 儿童相比,GNN 儿童更多地参与异性活动和异性玩伴的游戏,而 GNN 儿童的同伴互动较少,但在行为问题或社交能力方面没有差异。具有 GNN 同伴偏好的男孩与有行为问题的同伴接触更多。具有 GNN 同伴偏好的女孩与有行为问题的同伴接触较少,但与社交能力强的同伴接触也较少,这可能会减少从同伴那里学习社交技能的机会。这些发现对未来社会化和发展的影响将进行讨论。