• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从 16 岁到 60 岁,大五人格的动机表现存在年龄和性别差异。

Age and gender differences in motivational manifestations of the Big Five from age 16 to 60.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Division of Gerontopsychology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2013 Feb;49(2):365-83. doi: 10.1037/a0028277. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1037/a0028277
PMID:22545841
Abstract

The present cross-sectional study investigated age and gender differences in motivational manifestations of the Big Five in a large German-speaking Internet sample (N = 19,022). Participants ranging in age from 16 to 60 years completed the Five Individual Reaction Norms Inventory (FIRNI; Denissen & Penke, 2008a), and two traditional Big Five measures. Age differences were found suggesting that mean levels of neuroticism and extraversion are negatively associated with age, whereas agreeableness and conscientiousness are positively associated. Openness to experience demonstrated a curvilinear association with age, with the highest mean levels in midlife. Gender differences were found suggesting that women, on average, have higher levels of neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness, while men are more open to experience. Neither the main effect of gender nor Age × Gender interactions were significant in the case of conscientiousness. In comparison to the 2 traditional Big Five measures, age differences in the motivational manifestations of the Big Five as assessed by the FIRNI were more pronounced, which might be explained by the greater developmental plasticity of flexible motivational processes or the intraindividual phrasing of the items of the FIRNI, compared to the kinds of behavioral descriptions that are emphasized in traditional Big Five items. The further study of such motivational processes might contribute to a better understanding of personality development.

摘要

本横断面研究调查了在一个大型德语互联网样本(N=19022)中,大五人格的动机表现的年龄和性别差异。参与者年龄在 16 岁至 60 岁之间,完成了五个体反应规范量表(FIRNI;Denissen & Penke,2008a)和两个传统的大五人格测量。发现年龄差异表明,神经质和外向性的平均水平与年龄呈负相关,而宜人性和尽责性与年龄呈正相关。开放性与年龄呈曲线关系,中年时平均水平最高。性别差异表明,女性的神经质、外向性和宜人性平均水平较高,而男性则更开放。在尽责性方面,既没有性别主效应,也没有年龄×性别交互作用。与传统的两个大五人格测量相比,FIRNI 评估的大五人格的动机表现的年龄差异更为明显,这可能是由于灵活的动机过程的发展可塑性较大,或者 FIRNI 项目的个体内表述,与传统大五人格项目中强调的行为描述类型相比。对这些动机过程的进一步研究可能有助于更好地理解人格发展。

相似文献

1
Age and gender differences in motivational manifestations of the Big Five from age 16 to 60.从 16 岁到 60 岁,大五人格的动机表现存在年龄和性别差异。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Feb;49(2):365-83. doi: 10.1037/a0028277. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
2
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
3
Age differences in the Big Five across the life span: evidence from two national samples.全生命周期中“大五”人格特质的年龄差异:来自两个全国性样本的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):558-66. doi: 10.1037/a0012897.
4
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
5
Gender differences in the relationship between big five personality traits and aggression among physical education students.体育专业学生中,大五人格特质与攻击性之间关系的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 8;15(1):8122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93038-w.
6
Social anxiety and the Big Five personality traits: the interactive relationship of trust and openness.社交焦虑与大五人格特质:信任与开放性的交互关系。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(3):212-22. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1008032. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
7
Big Five Personality Factors and Facets as Predictors of Openness to Diversity.大五人格因素及其方面对多样性开放度的预测。
J Psychol. 2017 Nov 17;151(8):752-766. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2017.1393377.
8
Long-term stability in the Big Five personality traits in adulthood.成年期大五人格特质的长期稳定性。
Scand J Psychol. 2007 Dec;48(6):511-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00609.x.
9
Big Five Traits as Predictors of a Healthy Lifestyle during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a Russian Cross-Sectional Study.大五人格特质对 COVID-19 大流行期间健康生活方式的预测:一项俄罗斯横断面研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 28;19(17):10716. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710716.
10
Reliability generalization meta-analysis of the internal consistency of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) by comparing BFI (44 items) and BFI-2 (60 items) versions controlling for age, sex, language factors.通过比较大五人格量表(BFI,44个项目)和大五人格量表第二版(BFI-2,60个项目)版本,控制年龄、性别、语言因素,对大五人格量表内部一致性进行可靠性概括性元分析。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 8;13(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02271-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Emophilia: psychometric properties of the emotional promiscuity scale and its association with personality traits, unfaithfulness, and romantic relationships in a Scandinavian sample.嗜情癖:情感滥交量表的心理测量特性及其与斯堪的纳维亚样本中的人格特质、不忠行为和浪漫关系的关联。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 26;15:1265247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1265247. eCollection 2024.
2
Do applicants from Generation X, Y, Z differ in personality traits? data from selection procedures in aviation (1987-2019).X世代、Y世代、Z世代的求职者在性格特征上有差异吗?来自航空业选拔程序的数据(1987 - 2019年)。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 1;14:1173622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173622. eCollection 2023.
3
UPDATED PROTOCOL: Universal school-based programmes for improving social and emotional outcomes in children aged 3-11 years: An evidence and gap map.
更新后的协议:改善3至11岁儿童社会和情感成果的基于学校的通用项目:证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 4;19(3):e1346. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1346. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Protocol for a systematic review: Universal school-based programmes for improving social and emotional outcomes in children aged 3-11 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.系统评价方案:以学校为基础的通用项目对3至11岁儿童社会和情感发展结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 May 10;14(1):1-39. doi: 10.1002/CL2.210. eCollection 2018.
5
Interdependencies Between Family and Friends in Daily Life: Personality Differences and Associations with Affective Well-Being Across the Lifespan.日常生活中家人与朋友间的相互依存关系:人格差异以及与一生情感幸福的关联
Eur J Pers. 2023 Mar-Apr;37(2):154-170. doi: 10.1177/08902070211072745. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
The Big Five personality traits and the fear of COVID-19 in predicting depression and anxiety among Japanese nurses caring for COVID-19 patients: A cross-sectional study in Wakayama prefecture.大五人格特质与对 COVID-19 的恐惧在预测照顾 COVID-19 患者的日本护士的抑郁和焦虑中的作用:和歌山县的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276803. eCollection 2022.
7
Gender-specific differences concerning psychosocial aspects and functional impairments that influence quality of life in oral cancer treatment.在口腔癌治疗中,关于影响生活质量的社会心理方面和功能障碍的性别差异。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jun;30(6):4905-4915. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06907-9. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
8
Relationship between sensory-processing sensitivity and age in a large cross-sectional Japanese sample.在一个大型日本横断面样本中,感觉处理敏感性与年龄之间的关系。
Heliyon. 2019 Oct 3;5(10):e02508. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02508. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
The Predictive Value of Personality Traits for Psychological Problems (Stress, Anxiety and Depression): Results from a Large Population Based Study.人格特质对心理问题(压力、焦虑和抑郁)的预测价值:一项基于大样本的研究结果。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(3-4):124-133. doi: 10.2991/j.jegh.2017.11.003.
10
Neuroticism and pain catastrophizing aggravate response to pain in healthy adults: an experimental study.神经质和疼痛灾难化加重健康成年人对疼痛的反应:一项实验研究。
Korean J Pain. 2018 Jan;31(1):16-26. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2018.31.1.16. Epub 2018 Jan 2.