• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类嗅觉中的性别差异:一项荟萃分析。

Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Sorokowski Piotr, Karwowski Maciej, Misiak Michał, Marczak Michalina Konstancja, Dziekan Martyna, Hummel Thomas, Sorokowska Agnieszka

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.

Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 13;10:242. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242
PMID:30814965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6381007/
Abstract

Although the view that women's olfactory abilities outperform men's is taken for granted, some studies involving large samples suggested that male and female olfactory abilities are actually similar. To address this discrepancy, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing studies on olfaction, targeting possible sex differences. The analyzed sample comprised = 8 848 (5 065 women and 3 783 men) for olfactory threshold (as measured with the Sniffin Sticks Test; SST), = 8 067 (4 496 women and 3 571 men) for discrimination (SST), = 13 670 (7 501 women and 6 169 men) for identification (SST), and a total sample of = 7 154 (3 866 women and 3 288 men) for works using University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). We conducted separate meta-analyses for each aspect of olfaction: identification, discrimination and threshold. The results of our meta-analysis indicate that women generally outperform men in olfactory abilities. What is more, they do so in every aspect of olfaction analyzed in the current study. However, the effect sizes were weak and ranged between = 0.08 and = 0.30. We discuss our findings in the context of factors that potentially shape sex differences in olfaction. Nevertheless, although our findings seem to confirm the "common knowledge" on female olfactory superiority, it needs to be emphasized that the effect sizes we observed were notably small.

摘要

尽管女性嗅觉能力优于男性的观点被视为理所当然,但一些涉及大样本的研究表明,男性和女性的嗅觉能力实际上是相似的。为了解决这一差异,我们针对可能存在的性别差异,对现有的嗅觉研究进行了荟萃分析。分析样本包括用于嗅觉阈值(通过嗅棒测试;SST测量)的8848人(5065名女性和3783名男性)、用于辨别(SST)的8067人(4496名女性和3571名男性)、用于识别(SST)的13670人(7501名女性和6169名男性),以及使用宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(UPSIT)的研究中的7154人(3866名女性和3288名男性)的总样本。我们对嗅觉的每个方面:识别、辨别和阈值进行了单独的荟萃分析。我们的荟萃分析结果表明,女性在嗅觉能力方面通常优于男性。此外,在本研究分析的嗅觉的每个方面都是如此。然而,效应大小较弱,范围在0.08至0.30之间。我们在可能影响嗅觉性别差异的因素背景下讨论了我们的发现。尽管如此,虽然我们的发现似乎证实了关于女性嗅觉优势的“常识”,但需要强调的是,我们观察到的效应大小明显较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0d8/6381007/29b1eae2e7cf/fpsyg-10-00242-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0d8/6381007/29b1eae2e7cf/fpsyg-10-00242-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0d8/6381007/29b1eae2e7cf/fpsyg-10-00242-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis.人类嗅觉中的性别差异:一项荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 13;10:242. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00242. eCollection 2019.
2
Olfactory testing in children using objective tools: comparison of Sniffin' Sticks and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT).使用客观工具对儿童进行嗅觉测试:Sniffin' Sticks与宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(UPSIT)的比较。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Mar 1;44(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40463-015-0061-y.
3
Comparing the accuracy and neuroanatomical correlates of the UPSIT-40 and the Sniffin' Sticks test in REM sleep behavior disorder.比较 UPSIT-40 和 Sniffin' Sticks 测试在 REM 睡眠行为障碍中的准确性和神经解剖相关性。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019 Aug;65:197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
4
Examination Techniques of the First Cranial Nerve: What Neurosurgical Residents Should Know.第一对脑神经的检查技术:神经外科住院医师应知晓的内容。
Malays J Med Sci. 2020 Oct;27(5):124-129. doi: 10.21315/mjms2020.27.5.12. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
5
Olfactory threshold selectively predicts positive psychometric schizotypy.嗅觉阈值可选择性地预测正性精神分裂症特质。
Schizophr Res. 2019 Jul;209:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
6
[Clinical application of Sniffin' Sticks olfactory psychophysical measurements].[嗅觉棒嗅觉心理物理学测量的临床应用]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;48(9):741-5.
7
Olfactory cleft computed tomography analysis and olfaction in chronic rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的嗅裂计算机断层扫描分析与嗅觉
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2016 Nov 1;30(6):402-406. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4365.
8
Cumulative lead exposure is associated with reduced olfactory recognition performance in elderly men: The Normative Aging Study.累积铅暴露与老年男性嗅觉识别能力下降有关:规范老化研究。
Neurotoxicology. 2015 Jul;49:158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
9
Development of normative data for the Brazilian adaptation of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.巴西版宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试常模数据的制定。
Chem Senses. 2015 Feb;40(2):141-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bju068. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
10
[Polish version of the Sniffin' Sticks Test - adaptation and normalization].[嗅觉棒测试波兰语版本 - 改编与标准化]
Otolaryngol Pol. 2014 Nov-Dec;68(6):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.otpol.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Odor of Fatty Acids: Differences in Threshold and Perception Intensity Between Sexes.脂肪酸气味:两性之间阈值和感知强度的差异。
Foods. 2025 Aug 10;14(16):2777. doi: 10.3390/foods14162777.
2
The Impact of Olfactory Loss on Quality of Life: A 2025 Review.嗅觉丧失对生活质量的影响:2025年综述
Chem Senses. 2025 Jul 25;50. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaf023.
3
The scent of mating strategy: sociosexual orientation was associated with olfaction and body odor sniffing behavior in Chinese and American populations.交配策略的气味:社交性取向与中美人群的嗅觉及体香嗅闻行为有关。

本文引用的文献

1
Development of an International Odor Identification Test for Children: The Universal Sniff Test.国际儿童气味识别测试的发展:通用嗅探测试。
J Pediatr. 2018 Jul;198:265-272.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 May 2.
2
Different patterns of age-related central olfactory decline in men and women as quantified by olfactory fMRI.通过嗅觉功能磁共振成像量化的男性和女性与年龄相关的中枢嗅觉衰退的不同模式。
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 8;8(45):79212-79222. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16977. eCollection 2017 Oct 3.
3
Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth.
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 22;13(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03134-9.
4
Odors as cognitive constructs: history of odor classification and attempts to map odor percepts to physical and chemical parameters.作为认知结构的气味:气味分类的历史以及将气味感知映射到物理和化学参数的尝试。
Chem Senses. 2025 Jan 22;50. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaf022.
5
Genome-wide association meta-analysis of human olfactory identification discovers sex-specific and sex-differential genetic variants.人类嗅觉识别的全基因组关联荟萃分析发现了性别特异性和性别差异性基因变异。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):5434. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61330-y.
6
Ambient Air Pollution and Smell Function: Evidence from the National Geographic Smell Survey.环境空气污染与嗅觉功能:来自《国家地理》嗅觉调查的证据。
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 11:2025.06.10.25329361. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.10.25329361.
7
Long-lasting effects of lavender exposure on brain resting-state networks in healthy women.薰衣草暴露对健康女性大脑静息态网络的长期影响。
Front Neurosci. 2025 Jun 10;19:1555922. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1555922. eCollection 2025.
8
Long-term self-reported symptoms and psychophysical tests in COVID-19 subjects experiencing persistent olfactory dysfunction: a 4-year follow-up study.新冠病毒感染后持续存在嗅觉功能障碍患者的长期自我报告症状及心理物理学测试:一项4年随访研究
Front Neural Circuits. 2025 May 7;19:1538821. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2025.1538821. eCollection 2025.
9
Individual Differences in Excitatory and Inhibitory Sexual Conditioning in Humans.人类兴奋性和抑制性性条件反射中的个体差异
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03141-2.
10
Cerebrovascular burden and neurodegeneration linked to 15-year odor identification decline in older adults.脑血管负担和神经退行性变与老年人15年的气味识别能力下降有关。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Mar 24;17:1539508. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1539508. eCollection 2025.
人类嗅觉不佳是19世纪的谬论。
Science. 2017 May 12;356(6338). doi: 10.1126/science.aam7263.
4
Establishment of olfactory diagnosis for the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.建立宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试中文版的嗅觉诊断。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Dec;6(12):1308-1314. doi: 10.1002/alr.21818. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
5
Cultural Adaptation of the Portuguese Version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" Smell Test: Reliability, Validity, and Normative Data.《“嗅觉棒”嗅觉测试葡萄牙语版本的文化适应性:信度、效度及常模数据》
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0148937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148937. eCollection 2016.
6
Cross-culturally modified University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for a Turkish population.针对土耳其人群对宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试进行跨文化修改。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):e138-41. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4212.
7
Development of the Arabic version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" odor identification test.“嗅觉棒”气味识别测试阿拉伯语版本的开发。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 May;273(5):1179-84. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3718-2. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
8
Olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in Myasthenia gravis: A study in Turkish patients.重症肌无力患者的嗅觉和味觉功能障碍:一项针对土耳其患者的研究。
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Sep 15;356(1-2):188-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.06.054. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
9
THE USE OF THE TRADITIONAL CHINESE VERSION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SMELL IDENTIFICATION TEST AND THE SMELL THRESHOLD TEST FOR HEALTHY YOUNG AND OLD ADULTS IN TAIWAN.台湾地区健康青年与老年人使用宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试中文版及嗅觉阈值测试的情况
Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Jun;120(3):928-43. doi: 10.2466/27.03.pms.120v17x5. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
10
Long-term memory for odors: influences of familiarity and identification across 64 days.气味的长期记忆:64天内熟悉度和识别度的影响
Chem Senses. 2015 May;40(4):259-67. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjv003. Epub 2015 Mar 4.