Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0603, USA.
Bipolar Disord. 2012 May;14(3):217-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01011.x.
Neurocognitive deficits are common in bipolar disorder and contribute to functional disability. However, the degree to which general and specific cognitive deficits affect everyday functioning in bipolar disorder is unknown. The goal of this meta-analysis was to examine the magnitude of the effect of specific neurocognitive abilities on everyday functioning in bipolar disorder.
We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of studies that reported associations between performance on objective neuropsychological tasks and everyday functioning among individuals with bipolar disorder. From an initial pool of 486 papers, 22 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 1344 participants. Correlation coefficients were calculated for 11 cognitive domains and four measurement modalities for functioning. We also examined effect moderators, such as sample age, clinical state, and study design.
The mean Pearson correlation between neurocognitive ability and functioning was 0.27, and was significant for all cognitive domains and varied little by cognitive domain. Correlations varied by methods of everyday functioning assessment, being lower for clinician and self-report than performance-based tasks and real-world milestones such as employment. None of the moderator analyses were significant.
Overall, the strength of association between cognitive ability and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder is strikingly similar to that seen in schizophrenia, with little evidence for differences across cognitive domains. The strength of association differed to a greater extent according to functional measurement approach.
神经认知缺陷在双相情感障碍中很常见,导致功能障碍。然而,一般和特定的认知缺陷对双相情感障碍患者日常生活功能的影响程度尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨特定神经认知能力对双相情感障碍患者日常生活功能的影响程度。
我们对报告了双相情感障碍患者在客观神经心理学任务表现与日常生活功能之间关联的研究进行了全面的荟萃分析。从最初的 486 篇论文中,有 22 项研究符合纳入标准,共包括 1344 名参与者。计算了 11 个认知领域和 4 个功能测量模式的相关系数。我们还检查了效应调节因素,如样本年龄、临床状态和研究设计。
神经认知能力与功能之间的平均 Pearson 相关系数为 0.27,所有认知领域均显著相关,且认知领域之间差异不大。相关性因日常功能评估方法而异,临床医生和自我报告的相关性低于基于表现的任务和现实生活里程碑(如就业)。没有一项调节分析有统计学意义。
总体而言,双相情感障碍患者认知能力与日常生活功能之间的关联强度与精神分裂症非常相似,认知领域之间几乎没有差异。关联的强度根据功能测量方法的不同而有很大差异。