Training and Performance Innovations,Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
Physiol Meas. 2012 Jun;33(6):915-24. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/6/915. Epub 2012 May 3.
Core temperature measurement with an ingestible telemetry pill has been scarcely investigated during extreme rates of temperature change, induced by short high-intensity exercise in the heat. Therefore, nine participants performed a protocol of rest, (sub)maximal cycling and recovery at 30 °C. The pill temperature (T(pill)) was compared with the rectal temperature (T(re)) and esophageal temperature (T(es)). T(pill) corresponded well to T(re) during the entire trial, but deviated considerably from T(es) during the exercise and recovery periods. During maximal exercise, the average ΔT(pill)-T(re) and ΔT(pill)-T(es) were 0.13 ± 0.26 and -0.57 ± 0.53 °C, respectively. The response time from the start of exercise, the rate of change during exercise and the peak temperature were similar for T(pill) and T(re.) T(es) responded 5 min earlier, increased more than twice as fast and its peak value was 0.42 ± 0.46 °C higher than T(pill). In conclusion, also during considerable temperature changes at a very high rate, T(pill) is still a representative of T(re). The extent of the deviation in the pattern and peak values between T(pill) and T(es) (up to >1 °C) strengthens the assumption that T(pill) is unsuited to evaluate central blood temperature when body temperatures change rapidly.
在极短时间的高强度运动导致的剧烈温度变化下,对可摄入式遥测药丸进行核心体温测量的研究甚少。因此,9 名参与者在 30°C 下进行了休息、(亚)最大强度自行车运动和恢复的方案。药丸温度(T(pill))与直肠温度(T(re))和食管温度(T(es))进行了比较。在整个试验中,T(pill)与 T(re) 相当吻合,但在运动和恢复期间与 T(es) 有较大差异。在最大运动期间,平均ΔT(pill)-T(re)和ΔT(pill)-T(es)分别为 0.13±0.26°C 和-0.57±0.53°C。从运动开始时的响应时间、运动期间的变化率和峰值温度来看,T(pill)和 T(re)相似。T(es)的响应时间早 5 分钟,增加速度快两倍多,峰值比 T(pill)高 0.42±0.46°C。总之,即使在非常高的速率下发生相当大的温度变化,T(pill)仍然是 T(re)的代表。T(pill)和 T(es)之间的模式和峰值值的偏差程度(高达>1°C)加强了这样一种假设,即当体温快速变化时,T(pill)不适合评估中心血液温度。