O'Brien C, Hoyt R W, Buller M J, Castellani J W, Young A J
U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Mar;30(3):468-72. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199803000-00020.
This study compared the agreement between core temperature measurements obtained using an ingestible temperature pill telemetry system (Tpill) with those obtained from rectal (Tre) and esophageal (Tes) thermocouples under conditions of increasing and decreasing body temperature.
Four men and five women (age 25+/-2 yr, BSA 1.81+/-0.05 m2, VO2 peak 3.1+/-0.4 L x min[-1]) participated in four 3-h trials: cold (18 degrees C) water rest (CWR), cold water exercise (CWE), warm (36 degrees C) water rest (WWR), and warm water exercise (WWE). Subjects were immersed to the neck for each trial. During resting trials, subjects sat quietly. During exercise trials, subjects completed three bouts of 15 min of rest, followed by 45 min of exercise on a cycle ergometer at 50% of peak oxygen uptake. The temperature pill was taken 10-12 h before testing, after which the subjects fasted.
The trials created conditions of constantly decreasing (CWR) or increasing (WWR) core temperature, as well as periods of oscillating core temperature (CWE and WWE). Root mean squared deviation (RMSD) was calculated for each pair of measurements (Tpill vs Tre, Tpill vs Tes, Tre vs Tes) for each trial. An RMSD of "0" indicates perfect agreement; as RMSD increases, agreement worsens. On CWR, the RMSD for Tpill-Tes (0.23+/-0.04) was lower (P < 0.05) than for Tpill-Tre (0.43+/-0.10) or Tre-Tes (0.46+/-0.09). There were no significant differences in RMSD between measurement pairs on any other trial (average RMSD = 0.26 degrees C). Telemetry pill temperature and response time tended to be intermediate between Tre and Tes.
These results suggest the telemetry pill system provides a valid measurement of core temperature during conditions of decreasing as well as increasing body temperature and during steady state.
本研究比较了在体温上升和下降的情况下,使用可摄入式体温药丸遥测系统(Tpill)获得的核心温度测量值与直肠(Tre)和食管(Tes)热电偶获得的核心温度测量值之间的一致性。
4名男性和5名女性(年龄25±2岁,体表面积1.81±0.05 m2,峰值摄氧量3.1±0.4 L·min-1)参与了四项3小时的试验:冷水休息(CWR)、冷水运动(CWE)、温水休息(WWR)和温水运动(WWE)。每次试验中,受试者均被浸至颈部。在休息试验期间,受试者安静地坐着。在运动试验期间,受试者完成3组15分钟的休息,然后在功率自行车上以峰值摄氧量的50%进行45分钟的运动。在测试前10 - 12小时服用体温药丸,之后受试者禁食。
试验创造了核心温度持续下降(CWR)或上升(WWR)的条件,以及核心温度波动的时期(CWE和WWE)。计算每次试验中每对测量值(Tpill与Tre、Tpill与Tes、Tre与Tes)的均方根偏差(RMSD)。RMSD为“0”表示完全一致;随着RMSD增加,一致性变差。在CWR中,Tpill - Tes的RMSD(0.23±0.04)低于(P < 0.05)Tpill - Tre(0.43±0.10)或Tre - Tes(0.46±0.09)。在任何其他试验中,测量对之间的RMSD均无显著差异(平均RMSD = 0.26℃)。遥测药丸温度和响应时间往往介于Tre和Tes之间。
这些结果表明,遥测药丸系统在体温下降、上升以及稳态条件下均能提供有效的核心温度测量值。