• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印刷品暴露对视觉单词识别中身体-物体交互效应的影响。

The influence of print exposure on the body-object interaction effect in visual word recognition.

作者信息

Hansen Dana, Siakaluk Paul D, Pexman Penny M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George BC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 3;6:113. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00113. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00113
PMID:22563312
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3342677/
Abstract

We examined the influence of print exposure on the body-object interaction (BOI) effect in visual word recognition. High print exposure readers and low print exposure readers either made semantic categorizations ("Is the word easily imageable?"; Experiment 1) or phonological lexical decisions ("Does the item sound like a real English word?"; Experiment 2). The results from Experiment 1 showed that there was a larger BOI effect for the low print exposure readers than for the high print exposure readers in semantic categorization, though an effect was observed for both print exposure groups. However, the results from Experiment 2 showed that the BOI effect was observed only for the high print exposure readers in phonological lexical decision. The results of the present study suggest that print exposure does influence the BOI effect, and that this influence varies as a function of task demands.

摘要

我们研究了印刷品暴露对视觉单词识别中身体-物体交互(BOI)效应的影响。高印刷品暴露读者和低印刷品暴露读者分别进行语义分类(“这个单词容易想象出来吗?”;实验1)或语音词汇判断(“这个词听起来像一个真正的英语单词吗?”;实验2)。实验1的结果表明,在语义分类中,低印刷品暴露读者的BOI效应比高印刷品暴露读者更大,尽管两个印刷品暴露组都观察到了这种效应。然而,实验2的结果表明,在语音词汇判断中,只有高印刷品暴露读者观察到了BOI效应。本研究结果表明,印刷品暴露确实会影响BOI效应,而且这种影响会随着任务要求的变化而变化。

相似文献

1
The influence of print exposure on the body-object interaction effect in visual word recognition.印刷品暴露对视觉单词识别中身体-物体交互效应的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 3;6:113. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00113. eCollection 2012.
2
The benefits of sensorimotor knowledge: body-object interaction facilitates semantic processing.感觉运动知识的好处:身体-物体互动促进语义处理。
Cogn Sci. 2008 Apr 5;32(3):591-605. doi: 10.1080/03640210802035399.
3
Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect.视觉单词识别过程中感觉运动信息激活的证据:身体 - 物体交互效应。
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):433-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.011. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
4
Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing.把握词汇语义加工中的感觉运动效应。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):1-13. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1072-1.
5
The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing.语义加工中身体 - 物体交互效应的神经关联。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 16;6:22. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00022. eCollection 2012 Jan 24.
6
Flexible recruitment of semantic richness: context modulates body-object interaction effects in lexical-semantic processing.语义丰富性的灵活征募:语境在词汇语义加工中调节身体与物体的交互作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 15;6:53. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00053. eCollection 2012.
7
Body-object interaction effect in word recognition and its relationship with screen time in Chinese children.中文儿童单词识别中的身体-物体交互效应及其与屏幕使用时间的关系。
Read Writ. 2022 Jan 29:1-28. doi: 10.1007/s11145-021-10238-2.
8
Body-object interaction ratings for 3600 French nouns.3600 个法语音译名词的体感交互评价。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):8009-8021. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02466-5. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
9
Development of Embodied Word Meanings: Sensorimotor Effects in Children's Lexical Processing.具身语义的发展:儿童词汇加工中的感觉运动效应
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 8;7:317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00317. eCollection 2016.
10
Context matters: How do task demands modulate the recruitment of sensorimotor information during language processing?情境很重要:在语言处理过程中,任务需求如何调节感觉运动信息的招募?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jan 17;16:976954. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.976954. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Body-object interaction ratings for 3600 French nouns.3600 个法语音译名词的体感交互评价。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):8009-8021. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02466-5. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
2
Introduction to the research topic meaning in mind: semantic richness effects in language processing.研究主题介绍:语言处理中的语义丰富性效应
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 5;7:723. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00723. eCollection 2013.
3
Effects of emotional and sensorimotor knowledge in semantic processing of concrete and abstract nouns.情绪和感觉运动知识对具体名词和抽象名词语义加工的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Oct 8;6:275. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00275. eCollection 2012.

本文引用的文献

1
An abundance of riches: cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition.丰富的资源:视觉单词识别中语义丰富性效应的跨任务比较
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 17;6:72. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00072. eCollection 2012.
2
Flexible recruitment of semantic richness: context modulates body-object interaction effects in lexical-semantic processing.语义丰富性的灵活征募:语境在词汇语义加工中调节身体与物体的交互作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 15;6:53. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00053. eCollection 2012.
3
The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing.语义加工中身体 - 物体交互效应的神经关联。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 16;6:22. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00022. eCollection 2012 Jan 24.
4
Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: individual differences in masked form priming.并非所有熟练读者都能破解密码:掩蔽形式启动中的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jan;38(1):152-63. doi: 10.1037/a0024953. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
5
How a hobby can shape cognition: visual word recognition in competitive Scrabble players.爱好如何塑造认知:竞争拼字游戏玩家的视觉词汇识别
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jan;40(1):1-7. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0137-5.
6
Some Insults are Easier to Detect: The Embodied Insult Detection Effect.有些侮辱更容易被察觉:具身侮辱检测效应。
Front Psychol. 2010 Nov 16;1:198. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00198. eCollection 2010.
7
Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project.个体在视觉词汇识别上的差异:来自英语词汇项目的启示。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):53-79. doi: 10.1037/a0024177. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
8
Imageability and body-object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns.599 个多音节名词的可想象性和身体-物体互动评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Dec;43(4):1100-9. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0117-5.
9
The benefits of sensorimotor knowledge: body-object interaction facilitates semantic processing.感觉运动知识的好处:身体-物体互动促进语义处理。
Cogn Sci. 2008 Apr 5;32(3):591-605. doi: 10.1080/03640210802035399.
10
Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions.心智和大脑中的概念表示:理论发展、当前证据和未来方向。
Cortex. 2012 Jul;48(7):805-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Apr 30.