• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有交流和/或认知问题的吞咽困难患者的荷兰 Swal-Qol 适应访谈版的可行性和重测信度。

The feasibility and test-retest reliability of the Dutch Swal-Qol adapted interview version for dysphagic patients with communicative and/or cognitive problems.

机构信息

Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2013 May;22(4):891-5. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0202-y. Epub 2012 May 30.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-012-0202-y
PMID:22644542
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3636442/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The adaptation of the Dutch Swal-Qol questionnaire to an interview format suitable for dysphagic patients with communicative and/or cognitive problems and evaluation of the feasibility and test-retest reliability.

METHODS

An observational study with two measurements within a 2-week time period in a sample of 57 stroke patients with dysphagia in a nursing home environment. The interview version of the Swal-Qol was evaluated in the total group and in subgroups of patients with and without communicative and/or cognitive problems.

RESULTS

The constructed interview version was considered feasible from an expert's and patient's point of view. The overall score and seven subscales of the Swal-Qol showed an excellent test-retest reliability (k > 0.75), and two subscales were considered good (k > 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that using a structured, and at the same time flexible, interview format tailored to the individual needs of stroke patients enhances the feasibility and does not compromise the test-retest reliability.

摘要

目的

将荷兰 Swal-Qol 问卷改编为适合有交流和/或认知问题的吞咽困难患者的访谈形式,并评估其可行性和重测信度。

方法

在养老院环境中对 57 例吞咽困难的中风患者进行了为期 2 周的两次测量的观察性研究。在总组和有/无交流和/或认知问题的患者亚组中评估了 Swal-Qol 的访谈版本。

结果

从专家和患者的角度来看,构建的访谈版本具有可行性。Swal-Qol 的总分和七个分量表显示出极好的重测信度(k>0.75),两个分量表被认为是良好的(k>0.60)。

结论

本研究表明,使用针对中风患者个体需求定制的结构化且灵活的访谈形式可提高可行性,且不会影响重测信度。

相似文献

1
The feasibility and test-retest reliability of the Dutch Swal-Qol adapted interview version for dysphagic patients with communicative and/or cognitive problems.具有交流和/或认知问题的吞咽困难患者的荷兰 Swal-Qol 适应访谈版的可行性和重测信度。
Qual Life Res. 2013 May;22(4):891-5. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0202-y. Epub 2012 May 30.
2
Feasibility and Psychometric Properties of the Adjusted DSWAL-QoL Questionnaire for Dysphagic Patients with Additional Language and/or Cognitive Impairment: Part I.针对伴有额外语言和/或认知障碍的吞咽困难患者的调整版DSWAL-QoL问卷的可行性和心理测量特性:第一部分。
Dysphagia. 2017 Jun;32(3):401-419. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9770-2. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of SWAL-QOL.《吞咽生活质量问卷》意大利语版的跨文化调适与验证
Dysphagia. 2016 Oct;31(5):626-34. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9720-z. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
4
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the swallowing quality of life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL).吞咽生活质量问卷(SWAL-QOL)挪威语版的文化适应性和验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Dec 5;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1248-0.
5
The validation of the Chinese version of the Swallow Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.采用探索性和验证性因子分析对中文版吞咽生活质量问卷(SWAL-QOL)进行验证。
Dysphagia. 2011 Jun;26(2):117-24. doi: 10.1007/s00455-010-9272-6. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
6
Validation and Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the SWAL-QOL.《吞咽生活质量问卷》德文版的效度及心理测量学特性
Dysphagia. 2018 Aug;33(4):431-440. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9872-5. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
7
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the SWAL-QoL Questionnaire in Greek.SWAL-QoL问卷在希腊语中的跨文化适应与验证
Dysphagia. 2018 Feb;33(1):91-99. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9837-8. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
8
A cross-sectional validation study of the Swedish version of SWAL-QOL.SWAL-QOL 瑞典语版的横断面验证研究。
Dysphagia. 2012 Sep;27(3):325-35. doi: 10.1007/s00455-011-9369-6. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
9
The psychometric and clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL questionnaire in evaluating swallowing problems experienced by patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer.SWAL-QOL 问卷评估口腔和口咽癌患者吞咽问题的心理测量学和临床有效性。
Oral Oncol. 2009 Aug;45(8):e67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 May 12.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of SWAL-QoL.荷兰语版SWAL-QoL的跨文化适应与验证
Dysphagia. 2009 Mar;24(1):66-70. doi: 10.1007/s00455-008-9174-z. Epub 2008 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
[The German Sydney Swallow Questionnaire : Reliability and validity in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia].[德国悉尼吞咽问卷:口咽吞咽困难患者的信度和效度]
HNO. 2021 Dec;69(12):969-977. doi: 10.1007/s00106-021-01000-9. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
2
Feasibility and Psychometric Properties of the Adjusted DSWAL-QoL Questionnaire for Dysphagic Patients with Additional Language and/or Cognitive Impairment: Part I.针对伴有额外语言和/或认知障碍的吞咽困难患者的调整版DSWAL-QoL问卷的可行性和心理测量特性:第一部分。
Dysphagia. 2017 Jun;32(3):401-419. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9770-2. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
Effects of Strengthening Exercises on Swallowing Musculature and Function in Senior Healthy Subjects: a Prospective Effectiveness and Feasibility Study.强化训练对健康老年受试者吞咽肌肉组织及功能的影响:一项前瞻性有效性和可行性研究。
Dysphagia. 2015 Aug;30(4):392-403. doi: 10.1007/s00455-015-9611-8. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
4
Prospective clinical study on long-term swallowing function and voice quality in advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and preventive swallowing exercises.同步放化疗联合预防性吞咽训练对晚期头颈癌患者长期吞咽功能及嗓音质量影响的前瞻性临床研究
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;272(11):3521-31. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3379-6. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
5
Validation in Swedish of Sydney swallow questionnaire.悉尼吞咽问卷在瑞典的验证。
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Oct 21;7:742. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-742.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the community integration questionnaire adjusted for people with aphasia.失语症患者社区融入问卷的心理测量特性调整。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Mar;91(3):395-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.021.
2
The validation of the Chinese version of the Swallow Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.采用探索性和验证性因子分析对中文版吞咽生活质量问卷(SWAL-QOL)进行验证。
Dysphagia. 2011 Jun;26(2):117-24. doi: 10.1007/s00455-010-9272-6. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
3
The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.COSMIN 清单用于评估健康状况测量仪器测量性能研究的方法学质量:一项国际 Delphi 研究。
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
4
The psychometric and clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL questionnaire in evaluating swallowing problems experienced by patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer.SWAL-QOL 问卷评估口腔和口咽癌患者吞咽问题的心理测量学和临床有效性。
Oral Oncol. 2009 Aug;45(8):e67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 May 12.
5
Validation in French of the SWAL-QOL scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.SWAL-QOL量表在法语环境下对口咽性吞咽困难患者的有效性验证。
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009 Mar;33(3):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gcb.2008.12.012. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of SWAL-QoL.荷兰语版SWAL-QoL的跨文化适应与验证
Dysphagia. 2009 Mar;24(1):66-70. doi: 10.1007/s00455-008-9174-z. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
7
Measurement of overall quality of life in nursing homes through self-report: the role of cognitive impairment.通过自我报告测量养老院的总体生活质量:认知障碍的作用。
Qual Life Res. 2007 Aug;16(6):1029-37. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9203-7. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
8
Conducting qualitative interview research with people with expressive language difficulties.对有表达性语言障碍的人进行定性访谈研究。
Qual Health Res. 2006 Dec;16(10):1386-404. doi: 10.1177/1049732306293846.
9
Development and validation of NEWSQOL, the Newcastle Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Measure.纽卡斯尔卒中特异性生活质量量表(NEWSQOL)的开发与验证
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17(2-3):143-52. doi: 10.1159/000075783. Epub 2003 Dec 23.
10
Linguistic deficits in the acute phase of stroke.中风急性期的语言缺陷。
J Neurol. 2003 Aug;250(8):977-82. doi: 10.1007/s00415-003-1134-9.