• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听觉后见偏差。

Auditory hindsight bias.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, 12666 72nd Avenue, Surrey, British Columbia, V3W 2M8, Canada.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):588-93. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0268-0.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-012-0268-0
PMID:22648656
Abstract

People who know the outcome of an event tend to overestimate their own prior knowledge or others' naïve knowledge of it. This hindsight bias pervades cognition, lending the world an unwarranted air of inevitability. In four experiments, we showed how knowing the identities of words causes people to overestimate others' naïve ability to identify moderately to highly degraded spoken versions of those words. We also showed that this auditory hindsight bias occurs despite people's efforts to avoid it. We discuss our findings in the context of communication, in which speakers overestimate the clarity of their message and listeners overestimate their understanding of the message.

摘要

人们往往会高估自己对事件结果的了解程度,或者高估他人对此事的天真认知。这种后视偏差普遍存在于认知中,使得世界呈现出一种不必要的必然性。在四项实验中,我们展示了知道单词的身份如何导致人们高估他人对这些单词的中度到高度退化的口语版本的天真识别能力。我们还表明,尽管人们努力避免这种情况,但这种听觉后视偏差仍然存在。我们在交流的背景下讨论了我们的发现,在交流中,说话者高估了他们信息的清晰度,而听者高估了他们对信息的理解。

相似文献

1
Auditory hindsight bias.听觉后见偏差。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):588-93. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0268-0.
2
Fluency misattribution and auditory hindsight bias.流畅性错误归因与听觉后见之明偏差。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Nov;46(8):1331-1343. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0840-6.
3
Auditory hindsight bias: Fluency misattribution versus memory reconstruction.听觉后见之明偏差:流畅性错误归因与记忆重构
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Jun;43(6):1144-1159. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000405. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
4
Hindsight bias: how knowledge and heuristics affect our reconstruction of the past.事后诸葛亮式偏差:知识和启发式思维如何影响我们对过去的重构。
Memory. 2003 Jul-Sep;11(4-5):357-77. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000595.
5
Older and younger adults' hindsight bias after positive and negative outcomes.老年人和年轻人在积极和消极结果后的后见之明偏差。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):16-28. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01195-w. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
6
Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning.后见之明偏差在元记忆中的表现:结果知识影响学习判断的再认。
Memory. 2021 May;29(5):559-572. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1919144. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
7
Hindsight bias: a by-product of knowledge updating?后见之明偏差:知识更新的副产品?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 May;26(3):566-81. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.3.566.
8
Age differences in hindsight bias: A meta-analysis.后见之明偏差的年龄差异:一项元分析。
Psychol Aging. 2019 Mar;34(2):294-310. doi: 10.1037/pag0000329. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
9
Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).听力正常儿童噪声-声码语音感知的一些神经认知关联:一项(研究的)复制与扩展 。 (注:原文括号部分不完整,翻译时保留原样)
Ear Hear. 2017 May/Jun;38(3):344-356. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000393.
10
Increased or reversed? The effect of surprise on hindsight bias depends on the hindsight component.增加还是反转?惊讶对后视偏差的影响取决于后视成分。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1539-44. doi: 10.1037/a0017006.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspective-taking and hindsight bias: When the target is oneself and/or a peer.换位思考与后见之明偏差:当目标是自己和/或同伴时。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jan 22:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02413-z.
2
Toward Quantifying Trust Dynamics: How People Adjust Their Trust After Moment-to-Moment Interaction With Automation.量化信任动态:人们如何在与自动化进行实时交互后调整其信任。
Hum Factors. 2023 Aug;65(5):862-878. doi: 10.1177/00187208211034716. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
3
Fluency misattribution and auditory hindsight bias.流畅性错误归因与听觉后见之明偏差。

本文引用的文献

1
Giving Debiasing Away: Can Psychological Research on Correcting Cognitive Errors Promote Human Welfare?赋予去偏置:纠正认知错误的心理学研究能否促进人类福利?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;4(4):390-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01144.x.
2
Surprise influences hindsight-foresight differences in temporal judgments of animated automobile accidents.惊讶影响对动画汽车事故时间判断的后见之明-远见差异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):385-91. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0062-4.
3
Hindsight bias from 3 to 95 years of age.回溯偏差:从 3 岁到 95 岁。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Nov;46(8):1331-1343. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0840-6.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):378-91. doi: 10.1037/a0021971.
4
When focusing on differences leads to similar perspectives.当关注差异导致相似的视角时。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):134-41. doi: 10.1177/0956797610392929. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
5
Contextual biases in the interpretation of auditory evidence.语境偏差对听觉证据的解释的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2011 Jun;35(3):178-87. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9226-4.
6
Interns overestimate the effectiveness of their hand-off communication.实习医生高估了他们交接班沟通的效果。
Pediatrics. 2010 Mar;125(3):491-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0351. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
7
Fluency misattribution and visual hindsight bias.流畅性错误归因与视觉后见之明偏差。
Memory. 2007 Jul;15(5):548-60. doi: 10.1080/09658210701390701.
8
Egocentrism over e-mail: can we communicate as well as we think?电子邮件中的自我中心主义:我们的沟通能如我们所想那般顺畅吗?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;89(6):925-36. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.925.
9
Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment.将换位思考视为以自我为中心的锚定与调整。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Sep;87(3):327-39. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327.
10
The "saw-it-all-along" effect: demonstrations of visual hindsight bias.“早就知道”效应:视觉后见之明偏差的实证
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Sep;30(5):960-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.960.