Suppr超能文献

采用自适应随机化方法,利用二元有序结局改进基于效用的剂量探索。

Adaptive randomization to improve utility-based dose-finding with bivariate ordinal outcomes.

作者信息

Thall Peter F, Nguyen Hoang Q

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2012.676586.

Abstract

A sequentially outcome-adaptive Bayesian design is proposed for choosing the dose of an experimental therapy based on elicited utilities of a bivariate ordinal (toxicity, efficacy) outcome. Subject to posterior acceptability criteria to control the risk of severe toxicity and exclude unpromising doses, patients are randomized adaptively among the doses having posterior mean utilities near the maximum. The utility increment used to define near-optimality is nonincreasing with sample size. The adaptive randomization uses each dose's posterior probability of a set of good outcomes, defined by a lower utility cutoff. Saturated parametric models are assumed for the marginal dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy distributions, allowing the possible requirement of monotonicity in dose, and a copula is used to obtain a joint distribution. Prior means are computed by simulation using elicited outcome probabilities, and prior variances are calibrated to control prior effective sample size and obtain a design with good operating characteristics. The method is illustrated by a Phase I/II trial of radiation therapy for children with brainstem gliomas.

摘要

本文提出了一种基于双变量有序(毒性、疗效)结果的引出效用,用于选择实验性治疗剂量的序贯结果适应性贝叶斯设计。根据后验可接受性标准来控制严重毒性风险并排除无前景的剂量,患者在具有接近最大后验平均效用的剂量之间进行适应性随机分组。用于定义接近最优性的效用增量随样本量非递增。适应性随机化使用由较低效用截止值定义的一组良好结果的每个剂量的后验概率。假设边际剂量 - 毒性和剂量 - 疗效分布采用饱和参数模型,允许剂量可能存在单调性要求,并使用copula来获得联合分布。先验均值通过使用引出的结果概率进行模拟计算,先验方差经过校准以控制先验有效样本量,并获得具有良好操作特性的设计。通过对脑干胶质瘤儿童进行放射治疗的I/II期试验对该方法进行了说明。

相似文献

1
Adaptive randomization to improve utility-based dose-finding with bivariate ordinal outcomes.
J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2012.676586.
2
Using joint utilities of the times to response and toxicity to adaptively optimize schedule-dose regimes.
Biometrics. 2013 Sep;69(3):673-82. doi: 10.1111/biom.12065. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
3
Utility-based optimization of combination therapy using ordinal toxicity and efficacy in phase I/II trials.
Biometrics. 2010 Jun;66(2):532-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01302.x. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
4
Parametric Dose Standardization for Optimizing Two-Agent Combinations in a Phase I-II Trial with Ordinal Outcomes.
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2017 Jan;66(1):201-224. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12162. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
5
An adaptive trial design to optimize dose-schedule regimes with delayed outcomes.
Biometrics. 2020 Mar;76(1):304-315. doi: 10.1111/biom.13116. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
6
Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios.
Biometrics. 2006 Sep;62(3):777-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00534.x.
7
A phase I/II seamless dose escalation/expansion with adaptive randomization scheme (SEARS).
Clin Trials. 2014 Feb;11(1):49-59. doi: 10.1177/1740774513500081. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
8
Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):466-479. doi: 10.1177/0962280216631763. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
9
STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
Stat Med. 2017 Nov 20;36(26):4106-4120. doi: 10.1002/sim.7428. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
10
Improved adaptive randomization strategies for a seamless Phase I/II dose-finding design.
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(2):333-347. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1535496. Epub 2018 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision generalized phase I-II designs.
Biometrics. 2025 Jul 3;81(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf043.
2
Bayesian Safety and Futility Monitoring in Phase II Trials Using One Utility-Based Rule.
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 20;43(29):5583-5595. doi: 10.1002/sim.10254. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
4
Generalized phase I-II designs to increase long term therapeutic success rate.
Pharm Stat. 2023 Jul-Aug;22(4):692-706. doi: 10.1002/pst.2301. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
5
A Bayesian phase I/II biomarker-based design for identifying subgroup-specific optimal dose for immunotherapy.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Jun;31(6):1104-1119. doi: 10.1177/09622802221080753. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
6
Precision Bayesian phase I-II dose-finding based on utilities tailored to prognostic subgroups.
Stat Med. 2021 Oct 30;40(24):5199-5217. doi: 10.1002/sim.9120. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
7
Dose Correlation of and Koidz. Drug Pairs in the Chinese Medicine Prescription Based on the Copula Function.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Aug 24;2021:9933254. doi: 10.1155/2021/9933254. eCollection 2021.
8
A Phase I-II Basket Trial Design to Optimize Dose-Schedule Regimes Based on Delayed Outcomes.
Bayesian Anal. 2021 Mar;16(1):179-202. doi: 10.1214/20-ba1205. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
9
10
A modular framework for early-phase seamless oncology trials.
Clin Trials. 2021 Jun;18(3):303-313. doi: 10.1177/1740774520981939. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Proportional odds model for dose-finding clinical trial designs with ordinal toxicity grading.
Stat Med. 2011 Jul 30;30(17):2070-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.4069. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
2
Utility-based optimization of combination therapy using ordinal toxicity and efficacy in phase I/II trials.
Biometrics. 2010 Jun;66(2):532-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01302.x. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
3
Patient-specific dose finding based on bivariate outcomes and covariates.
Biometrics. 2008 Dec;64(4):1126-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01009.x. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
4
Simultaneously optimizing dose and schedule of a new cytotoxic agent.
Clin Trials. 2007;4(2):113-24. doi: 10.1177/1740774507076934.
5
The continual reassessment method for multiple toxicity grades: a Bayesian quasi-likelihood approach.
Biometrics. 2007 Mar;63(1):173-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00666.x.
6
An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy.
Stat Med. 2006 Jul 30;25(14):2365-83. doi: 10.1002/sim.2325.
7
A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial.
Biometrics. 2005 Jun;61(2):343-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00314.x.
8
Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.
Biometrics. 2004 Sep;60(3):684-93. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00218.x.
9
Bayesian optimal designs for Phase I clinical trials.
Biometrics. 2003 Sep;59(3):591-600. doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.00069.
10
The bivariate continual reassessment method. extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes.
Control Clin Trials. 2002 Jun;23(3):240-56. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(01)00205-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验