Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.
Cell. 2012 Jun 8;149(6):1381-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.029.
Despite the explosive growth of genomic data, functional annotation of regulatory sequences remains difficult. Here, we introduce "comparative epigenomics"-interspecies comparison of DNA and histone modifications-as an approach for annotation of the regulatory genome. We measured in human, mouse, and pig pluripotent stem cells the genomic distributions of cytosine methylation, H2A.Z, H3K4me1/2/3, H3K9me3, H3K27me3, H3K27ac, H3K36me3, transcribed RNAs, and P300, TAF1, OCT4, and NANOG binding. We observed that epigenomic conservation was strong in both rapidly evolving and slowly evolving DNA sequences, but not in neutrally evolving sequences. In contrast, evolutionary changes of the epigenome and the transcriptome exhibited a linear correlation. We suggest that the conserved colocalization of different epigenomic marks can be used to discover regulatory sequences. Indeed, seven pairs of epigenomic marks identified exhibited regulatory functions during differentiation of embryonic stem cells into mesendoderm cells. Thus, comparative epigenomics reveals regulatory features of the genome that cannot be discerned from sequence comparisons alone.
尽管基因组数据呈爆炸式增长,但调控序列的功能注释仍然很困难。在这里,我们引入“比较表观基因组学”——种间比较 DNA 和组蛋白修饰——作为注释调控基因组的一种方法。我们在人、鼠和猪多能干细胞中测量了胞嘧啶甲基化、H2A.Z、H3K4me1/2/3、H3K9me3、H3K27me3、H3K27ac、H3K36me3、转录 RNA 以及 P300、TAF1、OCT4 和 NANOG 结合的基因组分布。我们观察到,在快速进化和缓慢进化的 DNA 序列中,表观基因组的保守性都很强,但在中性进化的序列中则不然。相比之下,表观基因组和转录组的进化变化呈线性相关。我们认为,不同表观遗传标记的保守共定位可以用来发现调控序列。事实上,在胚胎干细胞向中胚层细胞分化过程中,鉴定出的七对表观遗传标记具有调控功能。因此,比较表观基因组学揭示了仅通过序列比较无法识别的基因组的调控特征。