Weinmann S, Gühne U, Kösters M, Gaebel W, Becker T
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, Berlin, Deutschland.
Nervenarzt. 2012 Jul;83(7):825-31. doi: 10.1007/s00115-011-3468-3.
The German Society for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Neurology (DGPPN) guidelines on psychosocial interventions for people with severe mental illness appraise the transferability of results of trials evaluating community-based mental health services to the German situation. This assessment has to draw on research results on factors determining effectiveness. This must be seen against the background of a lack of high-quality trials in Germany. The article discusses system, context and setting factors related to the transfer of evidence on community-based service models from other countries. These issues are discussed on the basis of evidence concerning the models of case management, assertive community treatment and community mental health teams. International differences in study findings are highlighted and the importance of treatment-as-usual in influencing study results is emphasized. The more control services including elements of community-based care there are and the less the pressure to reduce inpatient treatment (threshold to inpatient care admission), the smaller the relative effect sizes of innovative care models will be.In the absence of direct evidence, careful examination of transferability is required before introducing health care models. Research has revealed solid evidence for several factors influencing the effects of innovative community mental health care. Among key factors in the care of people with severe mental illness, home visits and joint team responsibility for both psychiatric and social care were identified. This evidence can facilitate the adaptation of successful mental health care models in Germany.
德国精神病学、心理治疗与神经病学协会(DGPPN)关于为重度精神疾病患者提供心理社会干预的指南评估了评估社区心理健康服务的试验结果向德国情况的可转移性。这种评估必须借鉴关于决定有效性的因素的研究结果。这必须在德国缺乏高质量试验的背景下看待。本文讨论了与从其他国家转移基于社区的服务模式的证据相关的系统、背景和环境因素。这些问题是根据关于个案管理、积极社区治疗和社区心理健康团队模式的证据进行讨论的。突出了研究结果的国际差异,并强调了常规治疗对研究结果的影响的重要性。包括基于社区护理要素的对照服务越多,减少住院治疗的压力(住院护理入院门槛)越小,创新护理模式的相对效应量就越小。在缺乏直接证据的情况下,在引入医疗保健模式之前需要仔细审查可转移性。研究已经揭示了影响创新社区精神卫生保健效果的几个因素的确凿证据。在重度精神疾病患者护理的关键因素中,家访以及团队对精神科和社会护理的共同责任被确定。这一证据可以促进德国成功的精神卫生保健模式的调整。