• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Decision Processes about Condom Use among Shelter-Homeless LGBT Youth in Manhattan.曼哈顿无家可归的 LGBT 青年使用避孕套的决策过程
AIDS Res Treat. 2012;2012:659853. doi: 10.1155/2012/659853. Epub 2012 May 27.
2
Beliefs about condoms and their association with intentions to use condoms among youths in detention.关于避孕套的观念及其与被拘留青少年使用避孕套意愿的关联。
J Adolesc Health. 1994 May;15(3):228-37. doi: 10.1016/1054-139x(94)90508-8.
3
Using the theory of reasoned action (TRA) to understand the decision to use condoms in an STD clinic population.运用理性行为理论(TRA)来理解性病门诊人群使用安全套的决策。
Health Educ Q. 1996 Nov;23(4):528-42. doi: 10.1177/109019819602300411.
4
The impact of AIDS on an urban population of high-risk female minority adolescents: implications for intervention.艾滋病对城市高危少数族裔女性青少年人群的影响:干预措施的意义。
J Adolesc Health. 1994 May;15(3):216-27. doi: 10.1016/1054-139x(94)90507-x.
5
Substance use and risky sexual behavior among homeless and runaway youth.无家可归和离家出走青少年中的物质使用及危险性行为。
J Adolesc Health. 1998 Dec;23(6):378-88. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(98)00033-0.
6
Heterosexual experiences and partnerships of urban, low-income African-American and Hispanic youth.城市低收入非裔美国人和西班牙裔青少年的异性恋经历及伴侣关系。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1996 Mar 1;11(3):288-300. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199603010-00009.
7
HIV risk behavior, street outreach, and condom use in eight high-risk populations.八个高危人群中的艾滋病毒风险行为、街头外展服务及避孕套使用情况
AIDS Educ Prev. 1996 Jun;8(3):191-204.
8
Sexual risk of HIV infection among expatriates posted in AIDS endemic areas.派驻艾滋病流行地区的外派人员感染艾滋病毒的性风险。
AIDS. 1997 Jul 15;11(9):1173-81. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199709000-00014.
9
Differences in condom behaviors and beliefs among female drug users recruited from two cities.从两个城市招募的女性吸毒者在避孕套使用行为和观念上的差异。
Women Health. 1998;27(1-2):137-60. doi: 10.1300/J013v27n01_09.
10
Timing of HIV interventions on reductions in sexual risk among adolescents.青少年中艾滋病病毒干预措施对降低性风险的时机。
Am J Community Psychol. 1998 Feb;26(1):73-96. doi: 10.1023/a:1021834224454.

引用本文的文献

1
LGBTIQ+ Homelessness: A Review of the Literature.LGBTIQ+ 无家可归问题综述:文献回顾
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 26;16(15):2677. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152677.
2
Out on the street: a public health and policy agenda for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth who are homeless.街头:为无家可归的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别青年制定的公共卫生与政策议程。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2014;84(1):66-72. doi: 10.1037/h0098852.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival strategies of male homeless adolescents.男性无家可归青少年的生存策略。
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):274-82. doi: 10.1177/1078390311407913. Epub 2011 May 4.
2
Risk for HIV and unprotected sexual behavior in male primary partners of transgender women.男跨女变性者的男性主要性伴侣感染 HIV 和无保护性行为的风险。
Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Dec;40(6):1255-61. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9781-x. Epub 2011 May 21.
3
Correlates of engaging in survival sex among homeless youth and young adults.无家可归的青年和成年人从事生存性性行为的相关因素。
J Sex Res. 2011 Sep;48(5):423-36. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2010.501916. Epub 2011 May 24.
4
The Cannabis Expectancy Questionnaire for Men who have Sex with Men (CEQ-MSM): A measure of substance-related beliefs.《男男性行为者大麻预期问卷(CEQ-MSM)》:一种与物质相关的信念的测量工具。
Addict Behav. 2010 Jun;35(6):616-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.01.006. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
5
The worlds of homeless white and African American youth in San Francisco, California: a cultural epidemiological comparison.加利福尼亚州旧金山无家可归的白人和非裔美国青年的世界:一项文化流行病学比较。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(5):824-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.030. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
6
A comparison of risk factors for sexual victimization among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual homeless young adults.男同性恋、女同性恋、双性恋和异性恋无家可归青年中性侵风险因素的比较。
Violence Vict. 2008;23(5):586-602. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.23.5.586.
7
Comparison of HIV Risks among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Heterosexual Homeless Youth.男同性恋、女同性恋、双性恋和异性恋无家可归青少年的艾滋病毒感染风险比较。
J Youth Adolesc. 2008;37(4):456-464. doi: 10.1007/s10964-007-9171-9.
8
Predictors of sexual risk behaviors among newly homeless youth: a longitudinal study.新沦为无家可归的青少年中性行为风险行为的预测因素:一项纵向研究。
J Adolesc Health. 2008 Apr;42(4):401-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.023. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
9
Motivational influences on the safer sex behavior of agency-based male sex workers.动机对机构型男男性工作者安全性行为的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2008 Oct;37(5):845-53. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9341-1. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
10
Relational commitment and threats to relationship maintenance goals: influences on condom use.关系承诺与关系维持目标面临的威胁:对避孕套使用的影响。
J Am Coll Health. 2007 Jul-Aug;56(1):61-7. doi: 10.3200/JACH.56.1.61-68.

曼哈顿无家可归的 LGBT 青年使用避孕套的决策过程

Decision Processes about Condom Use among Shelter-Homeless LGBT Youth in Manhattan.

作者信息

Ream Geoffrey L, Barnhart Kate F, Lotz Kevin V

机构信息

School of Social Work, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Res Treat. 2012;2012:659853. doi: 10.1155/2012/659853. Epub 2012 May 27.

DOI:10.1155/2012/659853
PMID:22693658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3368177/
Abstract

Health behavior interventions based on Theory of Planned Behavior address participants' personally-held beliefs, perceived social norms, and control over the behavior. New data are always needed to "member check" participants' decision processes and inform interventions. This qualitative study investigates decision processes around condom use among 81 homeless LGBT youth ages 18-26. Findings indicated considerable endorsement of the conventional policy of always using condoms, promulgated in HIV prevention education targeting this population. Although some participants reported risk behavior in contexts of sex work, survival sex, casual encounters, open relationships, and substance use, most were aware of these risks and consistently safe in those situations. Condoms use boundaries became vulnerable in states of emotional need and negative mood. The only effect participants acknowledged of homelessness on condom use was indirect, through negative mood states. The most prevalent context of condom non-use was with long-term primary partners, a potential area of vulnerability because, of 13 participants for HIV or HCV, nine mentioned how they had been infected, and all nine believed they had acquired it from a primary partner. Findings imply programs should emphasize HIV risk potential within long-term romantic partnerships and mental health services to remediate negative mood states.

摘要

基于计划行为理论的健康行为干预措施涉及参与者个人持有的信念、感知到的社会规范以及对行为的控制。始终需要新数据来 “核实” 参与者的决策过程并为干预措施提供信息。这项定性研究调查了81名年龄在18至26岁之间的无家可归的 LGBT 青年使用避孕套的决策过程。研究结果表明,针对该人群的艾滋病预防教育中所倡导的始终使用避孕套的传统政策得到了相当程度的认可。尽管一些参与者报告在性工作、生存性交易、偶然邂逅、开放式关系和药物使用等情况下存在危险行为,但大多数人都意识到了这些风险,并在这些情况下始终保持安全。在情感需求和负面情绪状态下,避孕套使用的界限变得脆弱。参与者承认无家可归对避孕套使用的唯一影响是通过负面情绪状态产生的间接影响。不使用避孕套最普遍的情况是与长期的主要伴侣在一起,这是一个潜在的脆弱领域,因为在13名感染艾滋病毒或丙型肝炎病毒的参与者中,有9人提到了他们是如何感染的,并且所有9人都认为他们是从主要伴侣那里感染的。研究结果表明,项目应强调长期浪漫关系中的艾滋病毒风险可能性以及提供心理健康服务以改善负面情绪状态。