Suppr超能文献

ACCF/ACR/AIUM/ASE/ASN/ICAVL/SCAI/SCCT/SIR/SVM/SVS/SVU [更正] 2012 年外周血管超声和生理检查适用标准:动脉超声和生理检查:美国心脏病学会基金会适用标准特别工作组、美国放射学会、美国超声医学学会、美国超声心动图学会、美国肾脏病学会、血管实验室认证协会、心血管血管造影和介入学会、心血管计算机断层成像学会、介入放射学会、血管医学学会、血管外科学会、[更正]和血管超声学会的报告。[更正]。

ACCF/ACR/AIUM/ASE/ASN/ICAVL/SCAI/SCCT/SIR/SVM/SVS/SVU [corrected] 2012 appropriate use criteria for peripheral vascular ultrasound and physiological testing part I: arterial ultrasound and physiological testing: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, American College of Radiology, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nephrology, Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Interventional Radiology, Society for Vascular Medicine, Society for Vascular Surgery, [corrected] and Society for Vascular Ultrasound. [corrected].

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 17;60(3):242-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

Abstract

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), in partnership with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted a review of common clinical scenarios where noninvasive vascular testing (ultrasound and physiological testing) is frequently considered. The indications (clinical scenarios) were derived from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines and results of studies examining the implementation of the original appropriate use criteria (AUC). The 159 indications in this document were developed by a diverse writing group and scored by a separate independent technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9, to designate appropriate use (median 7 to 9), uncertain use (median 4 to 6), and inappropriate use (median 1 to 3). A total of 255 indications (with the inclusion of surveillance timeframes) were rated. One hundred and seventeen indications were rated as appropriate, 84 were rated as uncertain, and 54 were rated as inappropriate. The AUC for peripheral vascular disease have the potential to impact physician decision making, healthcare delivery, and reimbursement policy. Furthermore, recognition of uncertain clinical scenarios facilitates identification of areas that would benefit from future research.

摘要

美国心脏病学会基金会(ACCF)与主要的专业和亚专业学会合作,对经常考虑进行非侵入性血管检测(超声和生理检测)的常见临床情况进行了审查。这些适应症(临床情况)源自常见的应用或预期用途,以及当前的临床实践指南和检查原始适当使用标准(AUC)实施情况的研究结果。本文档中的 159 种适应症由不同的写作小组制定,并由另一个独立的技术小组根据 1 到 9 的评分进行评分,以指定适当的使用(中位数 7 到 9)、不确定的使用(中位数 4 到 6)和不适当的使用(中位数 1 到 3)。共对 255 种适应症(包括监测时间范围)进行了评分。117 种适应症被评为适当,84 种被评为不确定,54 种被评为不适当。外周血管疾病的 AUC 有可能影响医生的决策、医疗保健的提供和报销政策。此外,对不确定的临床情况的认识有助于确定需要进一步研究的领域。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

2
2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery.2011年美国麻醉医师协会/美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/美国神经学会护士协会/美国神经外科医师协会/美国放射学会/美国神经放射学会/神经外科医师大会/动脉粥样硬化影像与预防学会/心血管造影和介入学会/介入放射学会/神经介入外科学会/血管医学学会和血管外科学会关于颅外颈动脉和椎动脉疾病患者管理的指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组、美国中风协会、美国神经科学护士协会、美国神经外科医师协会、美国放射学会、美国神经放射学会、神经外科医师大会、动脉粥样硬化影像与预防学会、心血管造影和介入学会、介入放射学会、神经介入外科学会、血管医学学会和血管外科学会的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 22;57(8):e16-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.006. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验