Assessment of compatibility between extraction methods for NMR- and LC/MS-based metabolomics.

Because of the wide range of chemically and structurally diverse metabolites, efforts to survey the complete metabolome rely on the implementation of multiplatform approaches based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS). Sample preparation disparities between NMR and MS, however, may limit the analysis of the same samples by both platforms. Specifically, deuterated solvents used in NMR strategies can complicate LC/MS analysis as a result of potential mass shifts, whereas acidic solutions typically used in LC/MS methods to enhance ionization of metabolites can severely affect reproducibility of NMR measurements. These intrinsically different sample preparation requirements result in the application of different procedures for metabolite extraction, which involve additional sample and unwanted variability. To address this issue, we investigated 12 extraction protocols in liver tissue involving different aqueous/organic solvents and temperatures that may satisfy the requirements for both NMR and LC/MS simultaneously. We found that deuterium exchange did not affect LC/MS results, enabling the measurement of metabolites by NMR and, subsequently, the direct analysis of the same samples by using LC/MS with no need for solvent exchange. Moreover, our results show that the choice of solvents rather than the temperature determined the extraction efficiencies of metabolites, a combination of methanol/chloroform/water and methanol/water being the extraction methods that best complement NMR and LC/MS analysis for metabolomic studies.