Training in Interdisciplinary Research to Reduce Antimicrobial Resistance (TIRAR), Columbia University, School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
J Urban Health. 2012 Oct;89(5):848-60. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9692-8.
Parents who are recent immigrants and/or non-native English speakers are at increased risk for poor health literacy. For example, misconceptions regarding treatment for upper respiratory infections (URIs), including nonjudicious use of antibiotics, have been described among Latinos. We sought to assess the influence of health literacy on knowledge and beliefs surrounding URI care and to explore the correlation between two health literacy measures among Latino parents in northern Manhattan. A descriptive survey design was used, and a total of 154 Latino parents were enrolled from four early head start programs between September 2009 and December 2009. Health literacy was measured using the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA) and Newest Vital Sign (NVS); parental knowledge and beliefs regarding antibiotic treatment for URIs were also assessed. Analyses were conducted in 2010 with multivariable logistic regression performed to examine predictors of health literacy. Inadequate health literacy was observed in 83.8 % of respondents using NVS and 35.7 % with the S-TOFHLA. College education was significantly associated with adequate health literacy using either the NVS or S-TOFHLA; however, other results varied between measures. Using NVS, there was a greater likelihood of adequate health literacy with US birth status (AOR 13.8; 95 % CI, 1.99-95.1), >5 years US residency (AOR 7.6; 95 % CI, 1.3-43.1) and higher antibiotic knowledge scores (AOR 1.7; 95 % CI, 1.2-2.4). Using S-TOFHLA, the odds of adequate health literacy increased with access to a regular care provider (AOR 2.6; 95 % CI, 1.2-5.6). Scores consistent with adequate health literacy on the NVS, but not the S-TOFHLA, were associated with correct beliefs regarding antibiotic use for URIs in comparison to scores of participants with inadequate health literacy. Since health literacy levels were low in this population and the risk of viral URI was high during the first few years of life, targeted education to improve health literacy, knowledge, and beliefs about URI and related antibiotic treatment is needed.
最近移民和/或非英语母语的父母,其健康素养较差的风险增加。例如,拉丁裔人群中存在上呼吸道感染(URIs)治疗方面的误解,包括不合理使用抗生素。我们试图评估健康素养对 URI 护理相关知识和信念的影响,并探索曼哈顿北部拉丁裔父母的两种健康素养测量方法之间的相关性。采用描述性调查设计,2009 年 9 月至 12 月,从四个早期开端计划中招募了 154 名拉丁裔父母。使用成人简易健康素养测试(S-TOFHLA)和最新生命体征(NVS)来衡量健康素养;还评估了父母对 URIs 抗生素治疗的知识和信念。2010 年进行了分析,采用多变量逻辑回归来检查健康素养的预测因素。使用 NVS 时,83.8%的受访者健康素养不足,而使用 S-TOFHLA 时则有 35.7%的受访者健康素养不足。使用 NVS 或 S-TOFHLA,接受过大学教育与健康素养不足显著相关;然而,其他结果在两种措施之间存在差异。使用 NVS,具有美国出生身份(OR 13.8;95%CI,1.99-95.1)、在美国居住时间>5 年(OR 7.6;95%CI,1.3-43.1)和更高的抗生素知识得分(OR 1.7;95%CI,1.2-2.4)的人更有可能具备足够的健康素养。使用 S-TOFHLA,与获得常规护理提供者相关的健康素养充足的几率增加(OR 2.6;95%CI,1.2-5.6)。与健康素养不足的参与者相比,NVS 上的得分与健康素养充足相关,且与正确的抗生素使用信念相关,而 S-TOFHLA 上的得分则不然。由于该人群的健康素养水平较低,并且在生命的头几年内病毒性 URI 的风险很高,因此需要进行有针对性的教育,以提高健康素养、URI 相关知识和对相关抗生素治疗的信念。