Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, England.
Psychol Assess. 2012 Dec;24(4):1024-33. doi: 10.1037/a0028983. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
Strengths assessments focus on the individual's talents, abilities, resources, and strengths. No systematic review of strengths assessments for use within mental health populations has been published. The aims of this study were to describe and evaluate strengths assessments for use within mental health services. A systematic review identified 12 strengths assessments (5 quantitative, 7 qualitative). The Strengths Assessment Worksheet (SAW) was the most widely utilized and evaluated qualitative assessment. Psychometric properties of the assessments were assessed against set quality criteria. Data on psychometric properties were available for 4 measures. The Client Assessment of Strengths, Interests and Goals (CASIG) had the strongest psychometric evidence. The SAW and CASIG assessments can be tentatively recommended within clinical practice, although the evidence for all strengths assessments is currently limited. To describe the content of the strengths assessment, the items used to operationalize the concept of strengths in each assessment were extracted and themed. Twenty-four themes were identified and organized into 3 overarching categories: individual factors, environmental factors, and interpersonal factors. These categories form the basis of an empirically based definition of strengths that could be used as a conceptual foundation for new clinical assessments.
优势评估侧重于个人的才能、能力、资源和优势。目前尚未发表针对心理健康人群使用的优势评估的系统评价。本研究旨在描述和评估心理健康服务中使用的优势评估。系统评价确定了 12 种优势评估方法(5 种定量,7 种定性)。优势评估工作表(SAW)是应用最广泛和评估最多的定性评估方法。根据既定的质量标准评估评估的心理测量特性。有 4 种措施的心理测量特性数据。客户优势、兴趣和目标评估(CASIG)具有最强的心理测量证据。SAW 和 CASIG 评估可以在临床实践中暂时推荐,尽管所有优势评估的证据目前都很有限。为了描述优势评估的内容,提取并主题化了每个评估中用于实施优势概念的项目。确定了 24 个主题,并组织成 3 个总体类别:个人因素、环境因素和人际因素。这些类别构成了基于经验的优势定义的基础,可作为新的临床评估的概念基础。