Suppr超能文献

眶额叶或外侧前额叶病变后的执行功能:神经心理学特征及日常生活中自我报告的执行功能

Executive functions after orbital or lateral prefrontal lesions: neuropsychological profiles and self-reported executive functions in everyday living.

作者信息

Løvstad M, Funderud I, Endestad T, Due-Tønnessen P, Meling T R, Lindgren M, Knight R T, Solbakk A K

机构信息

Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Norway.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2012;26(13-14):1586-98. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.698787. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the effects of chronic focal lesions to the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) or orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) on neuropsychological test performance and self-reported executive functioning in everyday living.

METHODS

Fourteen adults with OFC lesions were compared to 10 patients with LPFC injuries and 21 healthy controls. Neuropsychological tests with emphasis on measures of cognitive executive function were administered along with the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF-A) and a psychiatric screening instrument.

RESULTS

The LPFC group differed from healthy controls on neuropsychological tests of sustained mental effort, response inhibition, working memory and mental switching, while the BRIEF-A provided more clinically important information on deficits in everyday life in the OFC group compared to the LPFC group. Correlations between neuropsychological test results and BRIEF-A were weak, while the BRIEF-A correlated strongly with emotional distress.

CONCLUSIONS

It was demonstrated that LPFC damage is particularly prone to cause cognitive executive deficit, while OFC injury is more strongly associated with self-reported dysexecutive symptoms in everyday living. The study illustrates the challenge of identifying executive deficit in individual patients and the lack of strong anatomical specificity of the currently employed methods. There is a need for an integrative methodological approach where standard testing batteries are supplemented with neuropsychiatric and frontal-specific rating scales.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了外侧前额叶皮质(LPFC)或眶额皮质(OFC)的慢性局灶性损伤对神经心理学测试表现及日常生活中自我报告的执行功能的影响。

方法

将14名患有OFC损伤的成年人与10名患有LPFC损伤的患者及21名健康对照者进行比较。除了执行功能行为评定量表(BRIEF-A)和一种精神科筛查工具外,还进行了侧重于认知执行功能测量的神经心理学测试。

结果

LPFC组在持续精神努力、反应抑制、工作记忆和思维转换的神经心理学测试中与健康对照者存在差异,而与LPFC组相比,BRIEF-A为OFC组日常生活中的缺陷提供了更多具有临床重要性的信息。神经心理学测试结果与BRIEF-A之间的相关性较弱,而BRIEF-A与情绪困扰密切相关。

结论

结果表明,LPFC损伤特别容易导致认知执行缺陷,而OFC损伤在日常生活中与自我报告的执行功能障碍症状的关联更为密切。该研究说明了在个体患者中识别执行功能缺陷的挑战以及当前所用方法缺乏强大的解剖学特异性。需要一种综合的方法,即标准测试组合辅以神经精神科和额叶特异性评定量表。

相似文献

3
Mesulam's frontal lobe mystery re-examined.
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27(5):493-506. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2009-0511.
6
The assessment of executive functions: coming out of the office.
Brain Inj. 2004 Nov;18(11):1067-81. doi: 10.1080/02699050410001672387.
7
Assessing frontal behavioral syndromes and cognitive functions in traumatic brain injury.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2015;22(1):7-15. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2013.816703. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
8
The bridge between cognition and behavior in acquired brain injury: A graph theoretical approach.
Brain Behav. 2019 Mar;9(3):e01208. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1208. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
9
Validity of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX). Ratings by patients with brain injury and their therapists.
Brain Inj. 2014;28(12):1581-9. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.942371. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct neural patterns for various information in working memory: A brain connectivity study.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 3;20(7):e0326449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326449. eCollection 2025.
3
Executive functioning as a moderator of flossing behaviour among young adults: a temporal self-regulation theory perspective.
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2023 Aug 27;11(1):2249972. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2023.2249972. eCollection 2023.
4
Regional brain volume prior to treatment is linked to outcome after cognitive rehabilitation in traumatic brain injury.
Neuroimage Clin. 2022;35:103126. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103126. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
5
Patients with Ventromedial Prefrontal Lesions Show an Implicit Approach Bias to Angry Faces.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 May 1;33(6):1069-1081. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01706.
7
Threat-Modulation of Executive Functions-A Novel Biomarker of Depression?
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 2;12:670974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.670974. eCollection 2021.
8
Transgender Youth Executive Functioning: Relationships with Anxiety Symptoms, Autism Spectrum Disorder, and Gender-Affirming Medical Treatment Status.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2022 Dec;53(6):1252-1265. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01195-6. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
9
Neuropsychological Outcomes after Surgery for Olfactory Groove Meningiomas.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 21;13(11):2520. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112520.
10
The verbal, non-verbal and structural bases of functional communication abilities in aphasia.
Brain Commun. 2020 Aug 4;2(2):fcaa118. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa118. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Contribution of subregions of human frontal cortex to novelty processing.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb;24(2):378-95. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00099. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
3
Executive Function in the Real World: BRIEF lessons from Mark Ylvisaker.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):433-9. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181fbc272.
4
Neuropsychological assessment of the orbital and ventromedial prefrontal cortex.
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Oct;48(12):3377-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.012. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
6
Subjective rating of working memory is associated with frontal lobe volume in schizophrenia.
Schizophr Res. 2010 Jul;120(1-3):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.02.1067. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
7
Is the behavior rating inventory of executive function more strongly associated with measures of impairment or executive function?
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 May;16(3):495-505. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000093. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
8
Cognitive functioning ten years following traumatic brain injury and rehabilitation.
Neuropsychology. 2008 Sep;22(5):618-625. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.5.618.
9
Complex prospective memory: development across the lifespan and the role of task interruption.
Dev Psychol. 2008 Mar;44(2):612-7. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.612.
10
Is the prefrontal cortex important for fluid intelligence? A neuropsychological study using Matrix Reasoning.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;22(2):242-61. doi: 10.1080/13854040701218410.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验