• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿托品与遮盖治疗中度弱视的随机试验。

A Randomized Trial of Atropine vs Patching for Treatment of Moderate Amblyopia.

作者信息

Medghalchi A R, Dalili S

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Amiralmomenin Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

出版信息

Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2011 Aug;13(8):578-81. Epub 2011 Aug 1.

PMID:22737529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3371993/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

amblyopia is a major cause of visual impairment in children. Our aim is to compare patching and atropine penalization for treatment of moderate amblyopia in 4-10 years old children.

METHODS

During 2004-2007, in a randomized clinical trial, 120 patients aged 4-10 years old with moderate amblyopia in the range of 20/40 -20/100 were enrolled. Subjects randomized either to patch therapy or twice weekly atropine penalization in equal groups and were followed for 2 years. The success rate was defined as increment of 2 or more lines of visual acuity or final visual acuity of 20/25 or better.

RESULTS

The visual acuity in amblyopic eye improved from base line to a mean of 3.8 lines in patching group and mean of 3.7 lines in atropine group at the end of follow up. The average visual acuity in both groups was 0.5 Log MAR acuity that increased to 0.18 in patching group and 0.2 in atropine group.

CONCLUSION

Twice weekly atropine penalization could improve visual acuity of a magnitude like to improvement provided by patching in treatment of moderate amblyopia in patients aged 4-10 years.

摘要

背景

弱视是儿童视力损害的主要原因。我们的目的是比较遮盖疗法和阿托品压抑疗法对4至10岁儿童中度弱视的治疗效果。

方法

在2004年至2007年期间,一项随机临床试验纳入了120例年龄在4至10岁、弱视程度为20/40 - 20/100的中度弱视患者。受试者被随机分为两组,分别接受遮盖疗法或每周两次的阿托品压抑疗法,并随访2年。成功率定义为视力提高2行或更多行,或最终视力达到20/25或更好。

结果

随访结束时,弱视眼的视力在遮盖组从基线平均提高了3.8行,在阿托品组平均提高了3.7行。两组的平均视力均为0.5 Log MAR视力,遮盖组提高到0.18,阿托品组提高到0.2。

结论

对于4至10岁中度弱视患者,每周两次的阿托品压抑疗法提高视力的幅度与遮盖疗法相当。

相似文献

1
A Randomized Trial of Atropine vs Patching for Treatment of Moderate Amblyopia.阿托品与遮盖治疗中度弱视的随机试验。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2011 Aug;13(8):578-81. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
2
Clinical trial of patching versus atropine penalization for the treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in older children.大龄儿童屈光参差性弱视遮盖疗法与阿托品压抑疗法的临床试验
J AAPOS. 2008 Oct;12(5):493-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
3
A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.阿托品与眼罩治疗儿童中度弱视的随机试验。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar;120(3):268-78. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.3.268.
4
Two-year follow-up of a 6-month randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.一项针对儿童中度弱视治疗的阿托品与遮盖疗法为期6个月的随机试验的两年随访。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;123(2):149-57. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.2.149.
5
Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia.弱视的传统遮盖疗法与药物抑制疗法对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD006460. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006460.pub2.
6
Patching vs atropine to treat amblyopia in children aged 7 to 12 years: a randomized trial.眼罩疗法与阿托品治疗7至12岁儿童弱视的随机试验
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;126(12):1634-42. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.107.
7
The course of moderate amblyopia treated with atropine in children: experience of the amblyopia treatment study.儿童中度弱视阿托品治疗疗程:弱视治疗研究经验
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Oct;136(4):630-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00458-6.
8
Comparative efficacy of penalization methods in moderate to mild amblyopia.中度至轻度弱视中惩罚方法的比较疗效
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;145(3):562-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.10.029. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
9
A comparison of atropine and patching treatments for moderate amblyopia by patient age, cause of amblyopia, depth of amblyopia, and other factors.根据患者年龄、弱视病因、弱视程度及其他因素,对阿托品和遮盖疗法治疗中度弱视的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2003 Aug;110(8):1632-7; discussion 1637-8. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00500-1.
10
Effect of 4-Month Intermittent Atropine Penalization in Amblyopic Children for Whom Patch Therapy Had Failed.4个月间歇性阿托品抑制疗法对遮盖疗法失败的弱视儿童的疗效。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2017 Nov 1;54(6):375-380. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20170329-02. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptual learning with hand - eye coordination as an effective tool for managing amblyopia: A prospective study.手眼协调的知觉学习作为管理弱视的有效工具:一项前瞻性研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;70(10):3630-3633. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_852_22.
2
The Effect of Bangerter Filters on Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity With External Noise.班格特滤光镜对伴有外部噪声时视力和对比敏感度的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2022 May 13;16:804576. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.804576. eCollection 2022.
3
Management of amblyopia in pediatric patients: Current insights.儿童弱视的管理:当前的认识。
Eye (Lond). 2022 Jan;36(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01669-w. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
4
Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia.用于剥夺性弱视的遮盖法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 23;3(3):CD005136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005136.pub4.
5
Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia.传统遮盖法与药物压抑法治疗弱视的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 28;8(8):CD006460. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006460.pub3.
6
Simplified updates on the pathophysiology and recent developments in the treatment of amblyopia: A review.弱视的病理生理学简化更新及近期治疗进展综述。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;67(9):1392-1399. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_11_19.
7
Development of a core outcome set for amblyopia, strabismus and ocular motility disorders: a review to identify outcome measures.弱视、斜视和眼球运动障碍核心结局集的制定:一项用于识别结局指标的综述
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb 8;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1055-8.
8
The challenges of amblyopia treatment.弱视治疗的挑战。
Biomed J. 2015 Dec;38(6):510-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2015.06.001. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
9
Randomised controlled trial of video clips and interactive games to improve vision in children with amblyopia using the I-BiT system.使用I-BiT系统的视频片段和互动游戏改善弱视儿童视力的随机对照试验
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov;100(11):1511-1516. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307798. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
10
Short-term effects of vision trainer rehabilitation in patients affected by anisometropic amblyopia: electrofunctional evaluation.屈光参差性弱视患者视觉训练康复的短期效果:电功能评估
Doc Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;129(3):177-89. doi: 10.1007/s10633-014-9462-x. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at age 10 years.阿托品与眼罩治疗中度弱视的随机试验:10岁时的随访
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Aug;126(8):1039-44. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.8.1039.
2
Two-year follow-up of a 6-month randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.一项针对儿童中度弱视治疗的阿托品与遮盖疗法为期6个月的随机试验的两年随访。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;123(2):149-57. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.2.149.
3
A randomized trial of atropine regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.阿托品治疗方案用于儿童中度弱视的随机试验。
Ophthalmology. 2004 Nov;111(11):2076-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.04.032.
4
A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.一项关于儿童中度弱视治疗眼罩方案的随机试验。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 May;121(5):603-11. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.5.603.
5
A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.阿托品与眼罩治疗儿童中度弱视的随机试验。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar;120(3):268-78. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.3.268.
6
Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population.成人弱视的患病率及病因
Ophthalmology. 1998 Jan;105(1):154-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(98)91862-0.
7
Penalization versus part-time occlusion and binocular outcome in treatment of strabismic amblyopia.斜视性弱视治疗中惩罚疗法与部分遮盖法及双眼视功能结果
Ophthalmology. 1997 Dec;104(12):2156-60. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30047-5.