Department of Psychiatry, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Jul;8(4):312-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.2116.
The aim of this perspective article is to stimulate radical shifts in thinking and foster further discussion on the effective discovery, development, validation, and qualification process of biological markers derived from all available technical modalities that meet the complex conceptual and pathophysiological challenges across all stages of the complex, nonlinear, dynamic, and chronically progressive sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD). This perspective evaluates the current state of the science regarding a broad spectrum of hypothesis-driven and exploratory technologies and "markers" as candidates for all required biomarker functions, in particular, surrogate indicators of adaptive to maladaptive and compensatory to decompensatory, reversible to irreversible brain "systems failure." We stress the future importance of the systems biology (SB) paradigm (next to the neural network paradigm) for substantial progress in AD research. SB represents an integrated and deeper investigation of interacting biomolecules within cells and organisms. This approach has only recently become feasible as high-throughput technologies and mass spectrometric analyses of proteins and lipids, together with rigorous bioinformatics, have evolved. Existing high-content data derived from clinically and experimentally derived neural tissues point to convergent pathophysiological pathways during the course of AD, transcending traditional descriptive studies to reach a more integrated and comprehensive understanding of AD pathophysiology, derived systems biomarkers, and "druggable" system nodes. The discussion is continued on the premise that the lack of integration of advanced biomarker technologies and transfertilization from more mature translational research fields (e.g., oncology, immunology, cardiovascular), which satisfy regulatory requirements for an accurate, sensitive, and well-validated surrogate marker of specific pathophysiological processes and/or clinical outcomes, is a major rate-limiting factor for the successful development and approval of effective treatments for AD prevention. We consider the conceptual, scientific, and technical challenges for the discovery-development-validation-qualification process of biomarker tools and analytical algorithms for detection of the earliest pathophysiological processes in asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk during preclinical stages of AD. The most critical need for rapid translation of putative markers into validated (performance) and standardized (harmonized standard operating procedures) biomarker tools that fulfill regulatory requirements (qualify for use in treatment trials: e.g., safety, target engagement, mechanism of action, enrichment, stratification, secondary and primary outcome, surrogate outcome) is the availability of a large-scale worldwide comprehensive longitudinal database that includes the following cohorts: (a) healthy aging, (b) people at elevated risks (genetic/epigenetic/lifestyle/comorbid conditions), and (c) asymptomatic-preclinical/prodromal-mild cognitive impairment/syndromal mild, moderate, or severe AD. Our proposal, as initial strategic steps for integrating markers into future development of diagnostic and therapy trial technologies, is to work toward: (a) creating the essential research and development infrastructure as an international shared resource, (b) building the organizational structure for managing such a multinational shared resource, and (c) establishing an integrated transsectoral multidisciplinary global network of collaborating investigators to help build and use the shared research resource.
本文旨在激发人们对思维的彻底转变,并进一步探讨从所有可用技术中获取的生物标志物的有效发现、开发、验证和鉴定过程,这些技术能够满足贯穿整个复杂、非线性、动态和慢性进展性散发性阿尔茨海默病(AD)各个阶段的复杂概念和病理生理学挑战。本文评价了当前科学在广泛的假说驱动和探索性技术和“标志物”方面的现状,这些技术和标志物是所有必需的生物标志物功能的候选者,特别是作为适应性与失调性、代偿性与失代偿性、可逆性与不可逆性脑“系统衰竭”的替代指标。我们强调系统生物学(SB)范式(除神经网络范式之外)对于 AD 研究取得实质性进展的未来重要性。SB 代表了对细胞和生物体内部相互作用的生物分子的综合和深入研究。随着高通量技术和蛋白质组学与脂质组学的分析以及严格的生物信息学的发展,这种方法最近才变得可行。从临床和实验获得的神经组织中获得的现有高内涵数据表明,AD 过程中存在趋同的病理生理学途径,超越了传统的描述性研究,从而更深入地了解 AD 病理生理学、衍生的系统生物标志物和“可治疗”系统节点。本文的讨论基于以下前提,即缺乏先进的生物标志物技术的整合以及从更成熟的转化研究领域(例如肿瘤学、免疫学、心血管学)的转化,这些领域满足了对特定病理生理过程和/或临床结果的准确、敏感和经过充分验证的替代标志物的监管要求,这是 AD 预防有效治疗药物成功开发和批准的主要限速因素。我们考虑了在 AD 临床前阶段,在无症状高危个体中发现和开发用于检测最早病理生理过程的生物标志物工具和分析算法的发现-开发-验证-鉴定过程的概念、科学和技术挑战。将假定的标志物快速转化为满足监管要求的经过验证的(性能)和标准化的(协调的标准操作程序)生物标志物工具,以满足监管要求(有资格用于治疗试验:例如安全性、靶标结合、作用机制、富集、分层、次要和主要结果、替代结果),这是最关键的需求。这需要提供一个大规模的全球综合纵向数据库,其中包括以下队列:(a)健康衰老,(b)处于高风险的人群(遗传/表观遗传/生活方式/合并症),以及(c)无症状-临床前/前驱性-轻度认知障碍/症状性轻度、中度或重度 AD。我们的建议是,作为将标志物整合到未来诊断和治疗试验技术发展中的初始战略步骤,我们致力于:(a)创建作为国际共享资源的必要研究和开发基础设施,(b)构建管理这种跨国共享资源的组织结构,以及(c)建立一个综合的跨部门多学科全球合作研究网络,以帮助构建和使用共享研究资源。