Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Brussels, Belgium.
Environ Health. 2012 Jun 28;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S19. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-S1-S19.
The magic word 'complexity' has been buzzing around in science, policy and society for quite some time now. There seems to be a common feel for a 'new way' of doing things, for overcoming the limits of tradition. From the combined perspective of critical complexity thinking and environment and health practice we want to contribute to the development of alternative routines that may help overcome the limitations of traditional environment and health science. On the one hand traditional environment and health science is too self-confident with respect to potential scientific insight in environment and health problems: complexity condemns us to limited and ambiguous knowledge and the need for simplification. A more modest attitude would be more realistic from that point of view. On the other hand from a problem solving perspective more boldness is required. Waiting for Godot (perfect undisputed knowledge) will not help us with respect to the challenges posed to society by environment and health problems. A sense of urgency is legitimate: the paralysis by traditional analysis should be resolved. Nevertheless this sense of urgency should not withhold us from investing in the problem solving quality of our endeavour; quality takes time, fastness from a quality perspective often leads us to a standstill. We propose the concept of critical complexification of environment and health practice that will enable the integration of relevant actors and factors in a pragmatic manner. We will illustrate this with practical examples and especially draw attention to the practical complexities involved, confronting us not only with fundamental questions, but also with fundamental challenges.
“复杂性”这个神奇的词汇在科学、政策和社会领域已经流行了相当长的一段时间。现在似乎有一种共同的感觉,即需要一种“新的方式”来做事,以克服传统的局限。从批判复杂性思维和环境与健康实践的综合视角出发,我们希望为开发替代方案做出贡献,这些方案可能有助于克服传统环境与健康科学的局限性。一方面,传统的环境与健康科学对环境与健康问题的潜在科学洞察力过于自信:复杂性使我们陷入有限和模糊的知识中,并需要进行简化。从这个角度来看,更为谦虚的态度更为现实。另一方面,从解决问题的角度来看,需要更大的勇气。等待戈多(完美无争议的知识)并不能帮助我们应对环境与健康问题给社会带来的挑战。紧迫感是合理的:传统分析的瘫痪必须得到解决。然而,这种紧迫感不应阻止我们投资于我们努力的解决问题的质量;质量需要时间,从质量的角度来看,快速往往会导致我们停滞不前。我们提出了环境与健康实践的批判复杂化的概念,这将使我们能够以务实的方式整合相关的参与者和因素。我们将用实际的例子来说明这一点,特别是要注意到所涉及的实际复杂性,这些复杂性不仅使我们面临基本问题,还面临基本挑战。