• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃肠内镜质量保证。

Quality assurance for gastrointestinal endoscopy.

机构信息

Minnesota Gastroenterology PA and University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Bloomington, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;28(5):442-50. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283561f0d.

DOI:10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283561f0d
PMID:22759591
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review concerns quality assurance for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, especially colonoscopy and will emphasize research and guidelines published since January 2011. Important articles from previous years have been included for background.

RECENT FINDINGS

Critical lapses in endoscope processing and administration of intravenous sedation alerted us to the infection risk of endoscopy. Increases in cost of colonoscopy, evidence for overuse and studies demonstrating missed cancers have led some to question the value of endoscopy. Despite these setbacks, the National Polyp Study (NPS) consortium published their long-term follow-up of the original NPS patients and confirmed that colonoscopy with polyp removal can reduce the risk of colorectal cancer for an extended period. In this article, we will focus on ways to improve the value of outpatient colonoscopy.

SUMMARY

The United States national quality improvement agenda recently became organized into a more coordinated effort spearheaded by several public and private entities. They comprise the infrastructure by which performance measures are developed and implemented as accountability standards. Understanding wherein a gastroenterology (GI) practice fits into this infrastructure and learning ways we can improve our endoscopic practice is important for physicians who provide this vital service to patients. This article will provide a roadmap for developing a quality assurance program for endoscopic practice.

摘要

目的综述

本文主要关注胃肠道内镜检查(尤其是结肠镜检查)的质量保证,重点介绍 2011 年 1 月以来的研究和指南。为了介绍背景,文中也包含了前几年的重要文章。

最近的发现

内镜处理和静脉镇静管理方面的重大失误使我们意识到内镜检查存在感染风险。结肠镜检查费用的增加、过度使用的证据以及表明漏诊癌症的研究,使得一些人对内镜检查的价值提出了质疑。尽管存在这些挫折,国家息肉研究(NPS)联盟发表了他们对原始 NPS 患者的长期随访结果,并证实结肠镜检查结合息肉切除可以在较长时间内降低结直肠癌的风险。在本文中,我们将重点关注如何提高门诊结肠镜检查的价值。

总结

美国国家质量改进计划最近变得更加协调,由几个公共和私人实体牵头。它们构成了制定和实施绩效衡量标准作为问责制标准的基础。了解胃肠病学(GI)实践在这一基础设施中的定位,并学习改进内镜实践的方法,对于为患者提供这项重要服务的医生来说非常重要。本文将为内镜实践的质量保证计划的制定提供路线图。

相似文献

1
Quality assurance for gastrointestinal endoscopy.胃肠内镜质量保证。
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;28(5):442-50. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283561f0d.
2
Quality and safety issues in procedural rural practice: a prospective evaluation of current quality and safety guidelines in 3000 colonoscopies.农村手术操作中的质量与安全问题:对3000例结肠镜检查当前质量与安全指南的前瞻性评估
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1949. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
3
Quality assurance for endoscopists.内镜医师的质量保证。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Jun;25(3):349-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2011.05.003.
4
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.息肉切除术后结肠镜监测指南:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组和美国癌症协会的共识更新
Gastroenterology. 2006 May;130(6):1872-85. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.012.
5
Quality assurance in the endoscopy suite: sedation and monitoring.内镜检查室的质量保证:镇静与监测。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2004 Apr;14(2):415-29. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2004.01.010.
6
Quality assurance in the endoscopy unit: An emphasis on outcomes.内镜检查科室的质量保证:注重结果。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1999 Oct;9(4):595-607, vi.
7
Patterns of endoscopy in the United States: analysis of data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the National Endoscopic Database.美国的内镜检查模式:来自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心及国家内镜数据库的数据分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Mar;67(3):489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.08.041. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
8
Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice.结直肠镜报告质量和日常临床实践中结直肠镜性能的评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.032. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
9
Sedation in digestive endoscopy: the Athens international position statements.消化内镜镇静:雅典国际立场声明。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Aug;32(3):425-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04352.x. Epub 2010 May 8.
10
Quality assurance in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer diagnosis.结肠镜检查在结直肠癌诊断中的质量保证。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Jan;37(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting Task Difficulty of Learners in Colonoscopy: Evidence from Eye-Tracking.结肠镜检查中学习者任务难度的检测:来自眼动追踪的证据
J Eye Mov Res. 2021 Jul 13;14(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.14.2.5. eCollection 2021.
2
Eye gaze of endoscopists during simulated colonoscopy.内镜医师在模拟结肠镜检查过程中的眼球注视。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):137-143. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00950-1. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
3
Post-endoscopic procedure satisfaction scores: Can we improve?内镜检查术后满意度评分:我们能提高吗?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan 16;10(1):23-29. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i1.23.
4
Impact of Endotracheal Intubation on Interventional Endoscopy Unit Efficiency Metrics at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.气管插管对某三级学术医疗中心介入内镜科效率指标的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun;111(6):800-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.97. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
5
Quality measures for colonoscopy: where should we be in 2015?结肠镜检查的质量指标:到2015年我们应达到什么水平?
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2015 Mar;17(3):10. doi: 10.1007/s11894-015-0432-6.
6
Stability of increased adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Follow-up of an endoscopic quality improvement program-EQUIP-II.结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率增加的稳定性。内镜质量改进项目-EQUIP-II的随访
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;110(4):489-96. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.314. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
7
[International status colorectal cancer screening and quality assurance of screening-colonoscopy].[结直肠癌筛查的国际现状及筛查结肠镜检查的质量保证]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2013 Sep;163(17-18):409-19. doi: 10.1007/s10354-013-0232-2. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
8
Evaluation of magnifying colonoscopy in the diagnosis of serrated polyps.放大结肠镜检查在锯齿状息肉诊断中的评价。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4308-16. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4308.