• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Change4Life convenience store programme to increase retail access to fresh fruit and vegetables: a mixed methods process evaluation.改变生活便利店计划增加零售新鲜水果和蔬菜的供应:混合方法的过程评估。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039431. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
2
Can small stores have a big impact? A qualitative evaluation of a store fruit and vegetable initiative.小商店能产生大影响吗?对商店水果和蔬菜计划的定性评估。
Health Promot J Austr. 2013 Dec;24(3):192-8. doi: 10.1071/HE13045.
3
Variations in fresh fruit and vegetable quality by store type, urban-rural setting and neighbourhood deprivation in Scotland.苏格兰不同类型商店、城乡环境和社区贫困程度对新鲜果蔬质量的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2009 Nov;12(11):2044-50. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009004984. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
4
Implementation of a UK supermarket intervention to increase purchasing of fresh fruit and vegetables: process evaluation of the WRAPPED natural experiment.实施英国超市干预措施以增加新鲜水果和蔬菜购买量:WRAPPED 自然实验的过程评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Nov 11;21(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01679-3.
5
Trends of fruit and vegetable availability in neighbourhoods in Albany, NY, USA, 2003-2012.2003 - 2012年美国纽约州奥尔巴尼市社区水果和蔬菜供应情况的趋势
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Feb;18(3):562-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014000391. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
6
Socioeconomic differences in the cost, availability and quality of healthy food in Sydney.悉尼健康食品的成本、可得性和质量的社会经济差异。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Dec;41(6):567-571. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12694. Epub 2017 Jul 16.
7
Neighbourhood deprivation and the price and availability of fruit and vegetables in Scotland.苏格兰邻里贫困程度与蔬菜水果价格和供应的关系。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Oct;23(5):494-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01071.x.
8
Formative evaluation for a healthy corner store initiative in Pitt County, North Carolina: engaging stakeholders for a healthy corner store initiative, part 2.北卡罗来纳州皮埃特县健康街角商店计划的形成性评价:为健康街角商店计划吸引利益相关者,第 2 部分。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Jul 18;10:E120. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120319.
9
A four-year observational study to examine the dietary impact of the North Carolina Healthy Food Small Retailer Program, 2017-2020.一项为期四年的观察性研究,旨在研究北卡罗来纳州健康食品小型零售商计划对饮食的影响,2017-2020 年。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Mar 24;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01109-8.
10
Economic access to fruits and vegetables in the greater Quebec City: do disparities exist?大魁北克城的水果和蔬菜经济获取:是否存在差距?
Can J Public Health. 2009 Sep-Oct;100(5):361-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03405271.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Food Safety: Taxonomization of Private Initiatives to Design of Healthier Supermarket Environments.超越食品安全:将私人举措分类以设计更健康的超市环境。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2025 May 28;14(1):71. doi: 10.1007/s13668-025-00660-1.
2
Involving supermarkets in health promotion interventions in the Danish Project SoL. A practice-oriented qualitative study on the engagement of supermarket staff and managers.在丹麦项目 SoL 中,让超市参与健康促进干预。一项关于超市员工和经理参与情况的实践导向定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;23(1):706. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15501-5.
3
The implementation and effectiveness of outlet-level healthy food and beverage accreditation schemes: A systematic review.出口级健康食品和饮料认证计划的实施和效果:系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2023 Apr;24(4):e13556. doi: 10.1111/obr.13556. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
4
UK government's new placement legislation is a 'good first step': a rapid qualitative analysis of consumer, business, enforcement and health stakeholder perspectives.英国政府新的安置立法是“良好的第一步”:对消费者、企业、执法和卫生利益攸关方观点的快速定性分析。
BMC Med. 2023 Jan 26;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02726-9.
5
Perceived Availability of Healthy and Unhealthy Foods in the Community, Work, and Higher Education Settings across Five Countries: Findings from the International Food Policy Study 2018.五个国家社区、工作和高等教育环境中健康和不健康食品的可及性感知:2018 年国际粮食政策研究的调查结果。
J Nutr. 2022 Jun 13;152(Suppl 1):47S-56S. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac070.
6
Systematic review: a systems innovation perspective on barriers and facilitators for the implementation of healthy food-store interventions.系统评价:从系统创新视角看健康食品店干预措施实施的障碍和促进因素。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 21;16(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0867-5.
7
Lessons learned from implementing the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education Small Corner Store Project in Los Angeles County.从在洛杉矶县实施补充营养援助计划教育小便利店项目中吸取的经验教训。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Oct 22;16:100997. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100997. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Novel public-private partnerships to address the double burden of malnutrition.新型公私伙伴关系应对营养不良的双重负担。
Nutr Rev. 2018 Nov 1;76(11):805-821. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy035.
9
Merchant Attitudes Toward a Healthy Food Retailer Incentive Program in a Low-Income San Francisco Neighborhood.旧金山低收入社区商家对健康食品零售商激励计划的态度
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2018 Jul;38(4):207-215. doi: 10.1177/0272684X18781788.
10
Charting Availability of Processed and Unprocessed Foods in School Neighbourhood Nutrition Environments in an Urban Australian Setting.绘制澳大利亚城市环境中学校周边营养环境中加工食品和未加工食品的可获得情况。
J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:8397469. doi: 10.1155/2017/8397469. Epub 2017 May 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions in small food stores to change the food environment, improve diet, and reduce risk of chronic disease.小食品店干预措施以改变食品环境、改善饮食、降低慢性病风险。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E59. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
2
Measuring local food environments: an overview of available methods and measures.测量当地食物环境:现有方法和指标概述。
Health Place. 2011 Nov;17(6):1284-93. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
3
Assessing the evaluability of complex public health interventions: five questions for researchers, funders, and policymakers.评估复杂公共卫生干预措施的可评估性:研究人员、资助者和政策制定者的五个问题。
Milbank Q. 2011 Jun;89(2):206-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00626.x.
4
A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007.1966 - 2007年食物荒漠的系统评价。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Jul;6(3):A105. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
5
Measures of the food environment: a compilation of the literature, 1990-2007.食物环境的衡量指标:文献综述,1990 - 2007年
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr;36(4 Suppl):S124-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.012.
6
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.开发与评估复杂干预措施:医学研究理事会新指南
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
7
Food access and obesity.食物可及性与肥胖
Obes Rev. 2007 Mar;8 Suppl 1:99-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00327.x.
8
Bridging the gap between research and practice: a continuing challenge.弥合研究与实践之间的差距:一项持续的挑战。
Inj Prev. 2006 Dec;12(6):357-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.014159.
9
Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research - what happens when mixed method findings conflict? [ISRCTN61522618].在卫生服务研究中使用定量和定性数据——当混合方法的研究结果相互冲突时会发生什么?[ISRCTN61522618]
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Mar 8;6:28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-28.
10
Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice.初步研究的设计与分析:良好实践建议
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x.

改变生活便利店计划增加零售新鲜水果和蔬菜的供应:混合方法的过程评估。

The Change4Life convenience store programme to increase retail access to fresh fruit and vegetables: a mixed methods process evaluation.

机构信息

Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039431. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0039431
PMID:22761795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3384642/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Consumption of fruit and vegetables is important for health, but is often lower than recommended and tends to be socio-economically patterned with lower consumption in more deprived groups. In 2008, the English Department of Health introduced the Change4Life convenience store programme. This aimed to increase retail access to fresh fruit and vegetables in deprived, urban areas by providing existing convenience stores with a range of support and branded point-of-sale materials and equipment.

METHODS

We undertook a mixed-methods study of the Change4Life convenience store programme in the North East of England around two years after initial implementation. Store mapping (n = 87; 100% stores) and systematic in-store observations (n = 74; 85% stores) provided information on intervention fidelity; the variety, purchase price and quality of fresh fruit and vegetables on sale; and purchase price compared to a major supermarket. Ten qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of retailers and other professionals explored experiences of the intervention and provided further insight on quantitative results.

RESULTS

Intervention stores were primarily located in socio-economically disadvantaged areas. Fidelity, in terms of presence of branded materials and equipment, was low and much was not being used as intended. Fresh fruit and vegetables on sale were of high quality and had a purchase price around 10% more than comparable products at a major supermarket. Interviewees were supportive of the health improvement aim of the intervention. Retailers were appreciative of part-funding for chill cabinets and free point-of-sale materials. The intervention suffered from: poor initial and on-going communication between the intervention delivery team and retailers; poor availability of replacement point-of-sale materials; and failure to cement intended links with health workers and community organisations.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, intervention fidelity was low and the intervention is unlikely to have had a substantial or long-term effect on customers' consumption of fruit and vegetables.

摘要

背景

食用水果和蔬菜对健康很重要,但摄入量往往低于推荐量,而且往往存在社会经济模式,贫困人群的摄入量较低。2008 年,英国卫生部推出了 Change4Life 便利店计划。该计划旨在通过为现有便利店提供一系列支持以及品牌销售点材料和设备,增加贫困城市地区零售水果和蔬菜的供应。

方法

在 Change4Life 便利店计划最初实施大约两年后,我们在英格兰东北部地区开展了一项混合方法研究。通过商店地图绘制(n=87;100%的商店)和系统的店内观察(n=74;85%的商店),我们获得了干预措施的忠实程度、销售的新鲜水果和蔬菜的种类、购买价格和质量以及与一家大型超市的购买价格等信息。对零售商和其他专业人员的有目的样本进行了 10 次定性访谈,探讨了干预措施的经验,并对定量结果提供了进一步的见解。

结果

参与干预的商店主要位于社会经济处于不利地位的地区。从品牌材料和设备的存在来看,忠实程度较低,很多材料和设备没有按照预期使用。销售的新鲜水果和蔬菜质量很高,购买价格比主要超市的同类产品高出约 10%。受访者支持干预措施改善健康的目标。零售商对冷藏柜的部分资金支持和免费销售点材料表示赞赏。该干预措施存在以下问题:干预实施团队与零售商之间的初始和持续沟通不佳;替换销售点材料的可用性差;未能巩固与卫生工作者和社区组织的预期联系。

结论

总体而言,干预措施的忠实程度较低,该干预措施不太可能对顾客食用水果和蔬菜的行为产生重大或长期影响。