Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar;270(3):1093-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2104-6. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) of early stage oral cavity tumors have been thoroughly reported. However, statistical comparison of PDT to the surgical treatment is not available in published literature. We have identified and matched cohorts of patients with early stage oral cavity cancers undergoing surgery (n = 43) and PDT (n = 55) from a single institute experience. The groups are matched demographically and had the same pre-treatment screening and follow-up schedule. Both groups consisted only of tumors thinner than 5 mm to ensure comparability. The endpoints were local disease free survival, disease free survival, overall survival and response to initial treatment. Local disease free survival at 5 years were 67 and 74 % for PDT and surgery groups, respectively [univariate HR = 1.9 (p = 0.26), multivariable HR = 2.7 (p = 0.13)]. Disease free survival at 5 years are 47 and 53 % for PDT and surgery groups, respectively [univariate HR = 0.8 (p = 0.52), multivariable HR = 0.75 (p = 0.45)]. Overall survival was 83 and 75 % for PDT and surgery groups, respectively [(univariate HR = 0.5 (p = 0.19), multivariable HR = 0.5 (p = 0.17)]. In the PDT group, six patients (11 %) and in the surgery group 11 patients (26 %) had to receive additional treatments after the initial. All of the tested parameters did not have statistical significant difference. Although there is probably a selection bias due to the non-randomized design, this study shows that PDT of early stage oral cavity cancer is comparable in terms of disease control and survival to trans-oral resection and can be offered as an alternative to surgical treatment.
早期口腔肿瘤的光动力疗法(PDT)已得到充分报道。然而,在已发表的文献中,尚无法进行 PDT 与手术治疗的统计学比较。我们从单一机构的经验中确定并匹配了接受手术(n = 43)和 PDT(n = 55)治疗的早期口腔癌患者队列。这些组在人口统计学上相匹配,并且具有相同的治疗前筛查和随访计划。两组均仅包括厚度小于 5 毫米的肿瘤,以确保可比性。终点是局部无病生存率、无病生存率、总生存率和对初始治疗的反应。PDT 和手术组的 5 年局部无病生存率分别为 67%和 74%[单因素 HR = 1.9(p = 0.26),多因素 HR = 2.7(p = 0.13)]。PDT 和手术组的 5 年无病生存率分别为 47%和 53%[单因素 HR = 0.8(p = 0.52),多因素 HR = 0.75(p = 0.45)]。PDT 和手术组的总生存率分别为 83%和 75%[单因素 HR = 0.5(p = 0.19),多因素 HR = 0.5(p = 0.17)]。在 PDT 组中,有 6 名患者(11%)和手术组中有 11 名患者(26%)在初始治疗后需要接受额外的治疗。所有测试的参数均无统计学差异。尽管由于非随机设计可能存在选择偏倚,但本研究表明,早期口腔癌的 PDT 在疾病控制和生存率方面与经口切除术相当,可以作为手术治疗的替代方法。