Universidad Complutense, Spain.
Span J Psychol. 2012 Jul;15(2):756-67. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n2.38887.
This study had a twofold goal: to define differences in psychological aspects between cancer patients and a control group and to explore the predictive value of such aspects for the evolution of the disease two years later. Firstly, personality, anxiety, anger and depression were assessed in both groups. Results of t-analyses revealed significant group differences. In personality, cancer patients had higher levels of neuroticism and lower levels of extraversion, agreeableness and conscientiousness than the control group. In emotional variables, cancer patients had higher levels of anxiety and some aspects of anger, but there were no group differences in depression levels. Secondly, applying a quasi-prospective design, the predictive value of personality, emotions and coping styles for the evolution of cancer (favourable or unfavourable) was explored using generalized linear models and logistic regression. A four-predictor logistic model was fitted: Anger Expression-In, Resignation, Self-blame and Conscientiousness, indicating that the higher Anger Expression-in, Resignation, and Self-blame scores together with a lower Conscientiousness score, the more likely it is for patients' cancer to evolve unfavourably. These results indicate the crucial role of psychological aspects for the evolution of the disease and the need to include such aspects in the design of clinical interventions.
一是定义癌症患者和对照组之间心理方面的差异,二是探讨这些方面对两年后疾病发展的预测价值。首先,在两组人群中评估了人格、焦虑、愤怒和抑郁。t 分析的结果显示出两组之间存在显著差异。在人格方面,癌症患者的神经质水平高于对照组,而外向性、宜人性和尽责性水平低于对照组。在情绪变量方面,癌症患者的焦虑水平较高,愤怒的某些方面也较高,但抑郁水平没有组间差异。其次,采用准前瞻性设计,应用广义线性模型和逻辑回归探讨人格、情绪和应对方式对癌症(有利或不利)发展的预测价值。拟合了一个四预测因子逻辑模型:愤怒表达、听之任之、自责和尽责性,表明愤怒表达、听之任之和自责得分越高,尽责性得分越低,患者癌症发展越不利的可能性越大。这些结果表明心理方面对疾病发展至关重要,需要在临床干预设计中纳入这些方面。