• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一个用于分析患者-医疗保健提供者就诊的共享决策制定编码系统。

Development of a shared decision making coding system for analysis of patient-healthcare provider encounters.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Sep;88(3):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.011
PMID:22784391
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3417351/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the development and refinement of a scheme, detail of essential elements and participants in shared decision making (DEEP-SDM), for coding shared decision making (SDM) while reporting on the characteristics of decisions in a sample of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

The evidence-based patient choice instrument was modified to reflect Makoul and Clayman's integrative model of SDM. Coding was conducted on video recordings of 20 women at the first visit with their medical oncologists after suspicion of disease progression. Noldus Observer XT v.8, a video coding software platform, was used for coding.

RESULTS

The sample contained 80 decisions (range: 1-11), divided into 150 decision making segments. Most decisions were physician-led, although patients and physicians initiated similar numbers of decision-making conversations.

CONCLUSION

DEEP-SDM facilitates content analysis of encounters between women with metastatic breast cancer and their medical oncologists. Despite the fractured nature of decision making, it is possible to identify decision points and to code each of the essential elements of shared decision making. Further work should include application of DEEP-SDM to non-cancer encounters.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A better understanding of how decisions unfold in the medical encounter can help inform the relationship of SDM to patient-reported outcomes.

摘要

目的

描述一个方案的制定和完善过程,详细说明共享决策(SDM)的基本要素和参与者(DEEP-SDM),用于对转移性乳腺癌患者样本中的决策进行编码,并报告决策的特征。

方法

对基于证据的患者选择工具进行了修改,以反映 Makoul 和 Clayman 的综合 SDM 模型。对 20 名女性在怀疑疾病进展后首次就诊时与他们的肿瘤内科医生进行的视频记录进行了编码。使用视频编码软件平台 Noldus Observer XT v.8 进行编码。

结果

样本包含 80 个决策(范围:1-11),分为 150 个决策片段。大多数决策都是由医生主导的,尽管患者和医生发起的决策对话数量相似。

结论

DEEP-SDM 有助于对转移性乳腺癌女性与肿瘤内科医生之间的相遇进行内容分析。尽管决策具有分散性,但仍有可能确定决策点,并对共享决策的每个基本要素进行编码。进一步的工作应包括将 DEEP-SDM 应用于非癌症的相遇。

实践意义

更好地了解决策在医疗接触中是如何展开的,可以帮助了解 SDM 与患者报告的结果之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Development of a shared decision making coding system for analysis of patient-healthcare provider encounters.开发一个用于分析患者-医疗保健提供者就诊的共享决策制定编码系统。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Sep;88(3):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
2
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.乳腺 X 线摄影共享决策的关键要素:文献的范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
3
How Does a Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Intervention for Oncologists Affect Participation Style and Preference Matching in Patients with Breast and Colon Cancer?针对肿瘤学家的共同决策(SDM)干预措施如何影响乳腺癌和结肠癌患者的参与方式及偏好匹配?
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Jun;33(3):708-715. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1146-7.
4
Confusion in and about shared decision making in hospital outpatient encounters.医院门诊会诊中共同决策的内在及外在困惑。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.012. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
5
Inconsistencies in patient perceptions and observer ratings of shared decision making: the case of colorectal cancer screening.患者对共同决策的感知与观察者评分的不一致:以结直肠癌筛查为例。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Sep;80(3):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.034. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
6
Text-only and picture conversation aids both supported shared decision making for breast cancer surgery: Analysis from a cluster randomized trial.仅文本和图片对话辅助均支持乳腺癌手术的共享决策:一项集群随机试验分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Nov;103(11):2235-2243. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.015. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
7
An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters.医疗问诊中共同决策的整合模型。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):301-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
8
Shared Decision Making Guidance Reminders in Practice (SDM-GRIP).共享决策指导提醒工具(SDM-GRIP)。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.028. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
9
The Physician-as-Stakeholder: An Exploratory Qualitative Analysis of Physicians' Motivations for Using Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department.作为利益相关者的医生:对急诊科医生使用共同决策动机的探索性定性分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;23(12):1417-1427. doi: 10.1111/acem.13043. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
10
"I need to know what makes somebody tick …": Challenges and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Individualized Oncology.“我需要知道是什么在驱动着……”:个体化肿瘤学中实施共享决策的挑战与策略。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):555-562. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0615. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Black and Hispanic Women's Views on LUTS Treatment and a Home-Based Intervention.黑人和西班牙裔女性对下尿路症状治疗及家庭干预的看法。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2025 May 30. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001699.
2
Caregiver Values and Preferences Related to Surgical Decision-Making for Children with Medical Complexity.与患有复杂疾病儿童手术决策相关的照顾者价值观和偏好
J Pediatr. 2025 Jan;276:114366. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114366. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
3
Sharing a medical decision.分享医疗决策。

本文引用的文献

1
Going it together: persistence of older adults' accompaniment to physician visits by a family companion.结伴而行:老年人在医生就诊时由家庭陪伴者陪同的持续存在。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jan;60(1):106-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03770.x. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
2
Older adults' mental health function and patient-centered care: does the presence of a family companion help or hinder communication?老年人的心理健康功能和以患者为中心的护理:家庭陪伴者的存在是否有助于或阻碍沟通?
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):661-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1957-5. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
3
Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments.
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Mar;27(1):3-14. doi: 10.1007/s11019-023-10179-3. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
4
Behavioural observation tool for patient involvement and collaboration in emergency care teams (PIC-ET-tool).患者参与和协作在急诊医疗团队中的行为观察工具(PIC-ET 工具)。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jul 1;23(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00841-7.
5
Treatment decision making in psychiatry: Formulating patients' perspectives in outpatient psychiatric consultations.精神病学中的治疗决策:在门诊精神科会诊中阐述患者的观点。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 27;14:1144500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1144500. eCollection 2023.
6
Measurement of person-centred consultation skills among healthcare practitioners: a systematic review of reviews of validation studies.测量医疗从业者以患者为中心的咨询技能:验证研究的系统评价综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 5;23(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04184-6.
7
Shared decision making process measures and patient problems.共享决策过程的测量和患者问题。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2457-2465. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
8
A best-worst scaling survey of medical students' perspective on implementing shared decision-making in China.一项关于医学生对在中国实施共同决策的看法的最佳-最差尺度调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02406-9.
9
A skills network approach to physicians' competence in shared decision making.技能网络方法在医生共同决策能力中的应用。
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1466-1476. doi: 10.1111/hex.13130. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
10
Development of the Uncertainty Communication Checklist: A Patient-Centered Approach to Patient Discharge From the Emergency Department.《不确定性沟通清单的制定:以患者为中心的急诊科患者出院方法》。
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):1026-1034. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003231.
共同决策的测量——工具综述
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(4):313-24. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 May 4.
4
Family presence in routine medical visits: a meta-analytical review.家庭在常规医疗就诊中的参与:一项荟萃分析综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Mar;72(6):823-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.015. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
5
Sharing decisions in breast cancer care: Development of the Decision Analysis System for Oncology (DAS-O) to identify shared decision making during treatment consultations.分享乳腺癌护理决策:开发肿瘤学决策分析系统(DAS-O),以确定治疗咨询期间的共同决策。
Health Expect. 2011 Mar;14(1):29-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00613.x.
6
Shared decision making in oncology: assessing oncologist behaviour in consultations in which adjuvant therapy is considered after primary surgical treatment.肿瘤学中的共同决策:评估辅助治疗在原发性手术治疗后被考虑时,肿瘤医生在咨询中的行为。
Health Expect. 2010 Sep;13(3):244-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00587.x. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
7
Informed consent to promote patient-centered care.知情同意以促进以患者为中心的医疗。
JAMA. 2010 Mar 24;303(12):1190-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.309.
8
Family caregivers, patients, and physicians.家庭护理人员、患者和医生。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun;25(6):487; author reply 488. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1314-0.
9
Developing a dyadic OPTION scale to measure perceptions of shared decision making.开发一个对偶 OPTION 量表来衡量对共享决策的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Feb;78(2):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.009. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
10
Shared decision making coding systems: how do they compare in the oncology context?共享决策编码系统:它们在肿瘤学领域有何不同?
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Feb;78(2):261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Aug 3.