Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Acad Pediatr. 2012 Sep-Oct;12(5):420-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
The majority of participants drop out of pediatric obesity treatment programs; however, clinicians have little knowledge of how to address this problem. The objective of this study was to explore obesity treatment clinicians' perceptions of contributors to attrition, as well as methods to maintain family participation.
Semistructured interviews were conducted with 29 pediatric obesity clinicians representing primary care (PC), community based (CB), and tertiary care (TC) treatment programs in North Carolina. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded with a multistage inductive approach. Grounded theory was used to analyze responses.
Eleven themes emerged from analysis, including: the influence of program elements, family characteristics, and the variety of approaches used to address retention. Only TC programs reported attempts to address attrition. Patients' past experiences with obesity treatment, desire for immediate outcomes, and relationships with clinicians were perceived as important factors related to attrition. Other important themes were: families' understanding of obesity treatment, importance of realistic expectations, and families' value of treatment. Important differences and similarities among programs were identified. All clinicians reported families came to treatment through physician referral, not self referral.
Clinicians perceive attrition to be a significant problem in pediatric obesity treatment. As a result of clinical interviews, several potential avenues to address attrition were identified, including: the need for clinicians to develop relationships with families, assist in building appropriate expectations, and address families' value of treatment. Findings of this study can inform larger investigations of attrition, and guide exploration of family impressions of and experiences in treatment.
大多数参与者都退出了儿科肥胖治疗项目;然而,临床医生对于如何解决这个问题知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨肥胖治疗临床医生对导致流失的因素的看法,以及维持家庭参与的方法。
对北卡罗来纳州的 29 名儿科肥胖症临床医生进行了半结构化访谈,他们代表了初级保健(PC)、社区基础(CB)和三级保健(TC)治疗项目。访谈进行了录音、逐字记录,并采用多阶段归纳法进行编码。使用扎根理论分析了回应。
分析产生了 11 个主题,包括:项目要素、家庭特征和用于解决保留问题的各种方法的影响。只有 TC 项目报告了尝试解决流失问题。患者过去的肥胖治疗经历、对即刻结果的渴望以及与临床医生的关系被认为是与流失相关的重要因素。其他重要的主题包括:家庭对肥胖治疗的理解、现实期望的重要性以及家庭对治疗的重视。还确定了项目之间的重要差异和相似之处。所有临床医生都报告说,家庭是通过医生转介而不是自我转介来接受治疗的。
临床医生认为儿科肥胖治疗中的流失是一个严重的问题。通过临床访谈,确定了一些潜在的解决流失问题的途径,包括:临床医生需要与家庭建立关系,帮助建立适当的期望,并解决家庭对治疗的重视。本研究的结果可以为更大规模的流失调查提供信息,并指导对家庭对治疗的印象和体验的探索。