• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过度自信的一种增强现状论。

A status-enhancement account of overconfidence.

机构信息

Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, 545 Student Services Building #1900, Berkeley, CA 94720-1900, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Oct;103(4):718-35. doi: 10.1037/a0029395. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1037/a0029395
PMID:22800286
Abstract

In explaining the prevalence of the overconfident belief that one is better than others, prior work has focused on the motive to maintain high self-esteem, abetted by biases in attention, memory, and cognition. An additional possibility is that overconfidence enhances the person's social status. We tested this status-enhancing account of overconfidence in 6 studies. Studies 1-3 found that overconfidence leads to higher social status in both short- and longer-term groups, using naturalistic and experimental designs. Study 4 applied a Brunswikian lens analysis (Brunswik, 1956) and found that overconfidence leads to a behavioral signature that makes the individual appear competent to others. Studies 5 and 6 measured and experimentally manipulated the desire for status and found that the status motive promotes overconfidence. Together, these studies suggest that people might so often believe they are better than others because it helps them achieve higher social status.

摘要

在解释人们普遍存在过于自信的信念,即认为自己比别人更好的原因时,之前的研究主要集中在通过注意力、记忆和认知偏见来维持高自尊的动机上。另一种可能性是,过度自信会提高个人的社会地位。我们在 6 项研究中检验了这种过度自信的增强社会地位的解释。研究 1-3 发现,无论是在短期还是长期群体中,过度自信都会导致更高的社会地位,使用了自然主义和实验设计。研究 4 应用了 Brunswikian 镜头分析(Brunswik,1956),发现过度自信会导致一种行为特征,使个体在他人眼中显得有能力。研究 5 和 6 测量并实验性地操纵了对地位的渴望,发现地位动机促进了过度自信。综上所述,这些研究表明,人们可能经常认为自己比别人更好,因为这有助于他们获得更高的社会地位。

相似文献

1
A status-enhancement account of overconfidence.过度自信的一种增强现状论。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Oct;103(4):718-35. doi: 10.1037/a0029395. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
2
The social advantage of miscalibrated individuals: The relationship between social class and overconfidence and its implications for class-based inequality.个体校准错误的社会优势:社会阶层与过度自信的关系及其对基于阶层的不平等的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Feb;118(2):254-282. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000187. Epub 2019 May 20.
3
Punishing hubris: the perils of overestimating one's status in a group.惩罚傲慢:高估自己在群体中地位的危险。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jan;34(1):90-101. doi: 10.1177/0146167207307489.
4
The Role of Overconfidence in Romantic Desirability and Competition.过度自信在浪漫吸引力和竞争中的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Aug;41(8):1036-52. doi: 10.1177/0146167215588754. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
5
Myopic social prediction and the solo comparison effect.近视性社会预测与单独比较效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Dec;85(6):1121-35. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1121.
6
Knowing your place: self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups.认清自己的位置:面对面群体中的自我地位认知
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Dec;91(6):1094-110. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1094.
7
Binds and bounds of communion: effects of interpersonal values on assumed similarity of self and others.结合与约束:人际价值观对自我和他人假定相似性的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):879-97. doi: 10.1037/a0029422. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
8
Associations of self-esteem and temperament traits to self- and teacher-reported social status among classmates.自尊和气质特征与同学间自我报告和教师报告的社会地位的关系。
Scand J Psychol. 2010 Dec;51(6):488-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00820.x.
9
Group entity belief: an individual difference construct based on implicit theories of social identities.群体实体信念:一种基于社会身份隐性理论的个体差异结构。
J Pers. 2008 Jul;76(4):707-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00501.x. Epub 2008 May 12.
10
"The social advantage of miscalibrated individuals: The relationship between social class and overconfidence and its implications for class-based inequality": Correction to Belmi et al. (2019).《误判个体的社会优势:社会阶层与过度自信的关系及其对阶层不平等的启示》一文的更正:Belmi 等人(2019 年)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Feb;118(2):406. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000207. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential pathways from personality to risk-taking: how extraversion and negative emotionality shape decision-making through overconfidence.从人格到冒险行为的差异路径:外向性和负性情绪如何通过过度自信塑造决策过程。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 28;16:1537658. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1537658. eCollection 2025.
2
How laypeople evaluate scientific explanations containing jargon.外行人如何评估包含专业术语的科学解释。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02227-0.
3
Removing masculine defaults in the hiring process.在招聘过程中消除男性化的默认设置。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 8;122(14):e2501630122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2501630122. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
Expression of prestige through authentic pride, not dominance through hubristic pride, promotes fairness in ultimatum bargaining.通过真实的自豪来表达威望,而非通过傲慢的自豪来彰显主导地位,这有助于在最后通牒式谈判中促进公平。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93858-w.
5
Discrepancy between performance and feedback affects mathematics student teachers' self-efficacy but not their self-assessment accuracy.表现与反馈之间的差异会影响数学实习教师的自我效能感,但不会影响他们的自我评估准确性。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1391093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391093. eCollection 2024.
6
A legend in one's own mind: The link between ambition and leadership evaluations.自我心中的传奇:抱负与领导力评价之间的联系。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Aug 20;3(8):pgae295. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae295. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Genetic and Environmental Factors of Non-Ability-Based Confidence.非基于能力的自信的遗传和环境因素。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2022 Apr;13(3):734-746. doi: 10.1177/19485506211036610. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
8
Be careful what you wish for: Individuals perceived to desire status are afforded less status.小心你的愿望:被认为渴望地位的人会被给予较少的地位。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0304727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304727. eCollection 2024.
9
The nature of status: Navigating the varied approaches to conceptualizing and measuring status.地位的本质:探索概念化和衡量地位的多样方法。
Organ Psychol Rev. 2024 May;14(2):204-237. doi: 10.1177/20413866231220505. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
10
How do authors' perceptions of their papers compare with co-authors' perceptions and peer-review decisions?作者对其论文的看法与合著者的看法和同行评审决定相比如何?
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 10;19(4):e0300710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300710. eCollection 2024.