Harder D H, Zalma A
Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):729-45. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674108.
This study compared the validity of two promising measures of shame and guilt proneness: revisions of the Harder Personal Feelings Questionnaire (PFQ2; Harder & Lewis, 1987) and the Hoblitzelle Adapted Shame and Guilt Scale (ASGS; Hoblitzelle, 1982). Internal consistency, test-retest stability, factor structure, and construct validity with convergent and discriminant personality dimensions were examined for both scales. In addition to the shame and guilt measures, 63 (37 male, 26 female) mostly freshman college students completed a randomly ordered battery of personality scales theoretically relevant to shame and guilt proneness. Results support the reliability and shame/guilt factor structure of each scale. ASGS Shame correlations appeared marginally more valid with 11 external construct variables than PFQ2 Shame, whereas PFQ2 Guilt was clearly more valid than its corresponding ASGS subscale. New, potentially improved scales were constructed from the factor analyses and from item analyses. However, the resulting scales did not show improved validity.
哈德个人情感问卷修订版（PFQ2；哈德与刘易斯，1987年）以及霍布利策尔修订版羞耻与内疚量表（ASGS；霍布利策尔，1982年）。对这两个量表的内部一致性、重测稳定性、因子结构以及与收敛性和区分性人格维度的结构效度进行了检验。除了羞耻感和内疚感测量方法外，63名（37名男性，26名女性）大多为大学新生的学生完成了一系列随机排列的人格量表测试，这些量表在理论上与羞耻感和内疚倾向相关。结果支持了每个量表的信度和羞耻感/内疚感因子结构。与11个外部结构变量相比，ASGS羞耻感量表的相关性似乎略比PFQ2羞耻感量表更有效，而PFQ2内疚感量表明显比其对应的ASGS分量表更有效。通过因子分析和项目分析构建了新的、可能有所改进的量表。然而，所得量表并未显示出效度的提高。
