Suppr超能文献

M-CHAT墨西哥版本:效度、信度及一些文化考量

M-CHAT Mexican Version Validity and Reliability and Some Cultural Considerations.

作者信息

Albores-Gallo Lilia, Roldán-Ceballos Ofelia, Villarreal-Valdes Gabriela, Betanzos-Cruz Blanca Xochitl, Santos-Sánchez Claudia, Martínez-Jaime Maria Magdalena, Lemus-Espinosa Isaac, Hilton Claudia List

机构信息

Research Division, Hospital Psiquiátrico Infantil "Dr. Juan N. Navarro," Secretaría de Salud, Mexico.

出版信息

ISRN Neurol. 2012;2012:408694. doi: 10.5402/2012/408694. Epub 2012 Jul 1.

Abstract

The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) questionnaire is a brief measure available in Spanish which needs to be validated for the Mexican population. Parents of children from (1) community with typical development (TD) and (2) psychiatric outpatient unit completed the CBCL/1.5-5 and the Mexican/MM-CHAT-version. The study sample consisted of 456 children (age M = 4.46, SD = 1.12), 74.34% TD children and 26.65% with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). The MM-CHAT mean score for failed key items was higher for the ASD group compared with the TD group. Internal consistency for the Mexican/M-CHAT version was .76 for total score and .70 for the 6 critical items. Correlations between the MM-CHAT and the CBCL/1.5: PDD and Withdrawn subscales and with ADI-R dimensions: B non verbal) and A were high, and were moderate with ADI-R dimensions B1 (verbal) and C The failure rate of the MM-CHAT between the groups did not reproduce all the critical items found in other studies. Although the instrument has good psychometric properties and can be used for screening purposes in primary settings or busy specialized psychiatric clinics, these results support evidence for cultural differences in item responses, making it difficult to compare M-CHAT results internationally.

摘要

《幼儿自闭症修正检查表》(M-CHAT)问卷是一份简短的问卷,有西班牙语版本,但需要针对墨西哥人群进行验证。来自(1)发育正常(TD)社区和(2)精神科门诊的儿童家长完成了儿童行为检查表(CBCL/1.5 - 5)和墨西哥版/MM-CHAT问卷。研究样本包括456名儿童(平均年龄M = 4.46,标准差SD = 1.12),其中74.34%为发育正常儿童,26.65%患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)。与发育正常组相比,ASD组关键项目未通过的MM-CHAT平均得分更高。墨西哥版/M-CHAT问卷总分的内部一致性为0.76,6个关键项目的内部一致性为0.70。MM-CHAT与CBCL/1.5:广泛性发育障碍(PDD)和退缩分量表以及与自闭症诊断访谈修订版(ADI-R)维度:B(非言语)和A的相关性较高,与ADI-R维度B1(言语)和C的相关性为中等。两组之间MM-CHAT的未通过率并未重现其他研究中发现的所有关键项目。尽管该工具具有良好的心理测量特性,可用于基层医疗机构或繁忙的专业精神科诊所进行筛查,但这些结果支持了项目反应存在文化差异的证据,使得在国际上比较M-CHAT结果变得困难。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18be/3395208/9e402764e2e2/ISRN.NEUROLOGY2012-408694.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验