• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing the impact of cancer among Dutch non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors compared with their American counterparts: a cross-national study.评估荷兰非霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者与美国幸存者之间的癌症影响:一项跨国研究。
Psychooncology. 2013 Jun;22(6):1258-65. doi: 10.1002/pon.3131. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
2
Measuring the impact of cancer: a comparison of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and breast cancer survivors.测量癌症的影响:非霍奇金淋巴瘤和乳腺癌幸存者的比较。
J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Mar;4(1):45-58. doi: 10.1007/s11764-009-0106-1. Epub 2009 Dec 6.
3
Comparison of the impact of cancer between British and US long-term non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.英国和美国长期非霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者癌症影响的比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):739-748. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3454-1. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
4
Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the impact of cancer scale.癌症影响量表的优化与心理测量学评估。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Nov 5;100(21):1530-41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn340. Epub 2008 Oct 28.
5
Validation of the French translation-adaptation of the impact of cancer questionnaire version 2 (IOCv2) in a breast cancer survivor population.癌症问卷第2版(IOCv2)法语翻译改编版在乳腺癌幸存者群体中的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Jul 29;13:110. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0301-x.
6
The impact of cancer and quality of life for post-treatment non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.癌症对非霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗后幸存者生活质量的影响。
Psychooncology. 2010 Dec;19(12):1259-67. doi: 10.1002/pon.1684.
7
A procedure for obtaining impact of cancer version 2 scores using version 1 responses.使用版本 1 的回答获得癌症版本 2 评分影响的程序。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Feb;22(1):103-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0127-5.
8
The Impact of Cancer Scale (IOC) in Italian long-term cancer survivors: adaptation and psychometric evaluation.癌症量表(IOC)对意大利长期癌症幸存者的影响:适应和心理计量学评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3355-62. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1909-1. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
9
Psychological impact of lymphoma on adolescents and young adults: not a matter of black or white.淋巴瘤对青少年和青年的心理影响:并非非黑即白的问题。
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Aug;10(4):726-35. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0518-7. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
10
Demographic and disease characteristics associated with non-hodgkin lymphoma survivors' quality of life: does age matter?与非霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者生活质量相关的人口统计学和疾病特征:年龄有影响吗?
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Mar;40(2):157-62. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.157-162.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer worry is associated with increased use of supportive health care-results from the multinational InCHARGE study.癌症焦虑与更多使用支持性医疗保健相关——多国 InCHARGE 研究结果。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Feb;18(1):165-175. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01337-w. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
2
Measuring quality of life in people living with and beyond cancer in the UK.测量英国癌症患者及其康复者的生活质量。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Oct;29(10):6031-6038. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06105-z. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
3
: holistic needs assessment for haematological cancer patients.血液癌症患者的整体需求评估
Oncol Rev. 2018 Jul 4;12(2):374. doi: 10.4081/oncol.2018.374.
4
International evaluation of the psychometrics of health-related quality of life questionnaires for use among long-term survivors of testicular and prostate cancer.针对睾丸癌和前列腺癌长期幸存者使用的健康相关生活质量问卷的心理测量学的国际评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 11;15(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0670-4.
5
Comparison of the impact of cancer between British and US long-term non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.英国和美国长期非霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者癌症影响的比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):739-748. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3454-1. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
6
The impact of cancer and quality of life among long-term survivors of breast cancer in Austria.奥地利乳腺癌长期幸存者中癌症的影响及生活质量
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Nov;24(11):4705-12. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3319-7. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
7
Psychological impact of lymphoma on adolescents and young adults: not a matter of black or white.淋巴瘤对青少年和青年的心理影响:并非非黑即白的问题。
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Aug;10(4):726-35. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0518-7. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
8
Validation of the French translation-adaptation of the impact of cancer questionnaire version 2 (IOCv2) in a breast cancer survivor population.癌症问卷第2版(IOCv2)法语翻译改编版在乳腺癌幸存者群体中的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Jul 29;13:110. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0301-x.
9
An exploratory path model of the relationships between positive and negative adaptation to cancer on quality of life among non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.非霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者中癌症正负适应性与生活质量之间关系的探索性路径模型。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015;33(3):310-31. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2015.1020978.
10
The Impact of Cancer Scale (IOC) in Italian long-term cancer survivors: adaptation and psychometric evaluation.癌症量表(IOC)对意大利长期癌症幸存者的影响:适应和心理计量学评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3355-62. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1909-1. Epub 2013 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
A procedure for obtaining impact of cancer version 2 scores using version 1 responses.使用版本 1 的回答获得癌症版本 2 评分影响的程序。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Feb;22(1):103-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0127-5.
2
The impact of treatment, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics on health-related quality of life among Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors: a systematic review.治疗、社会人口学和临床特征对霍奇金淋巴瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者健康相关生活质量的影响:系统评价。
Ann Hematol. 2011 Sep;90(9):993-1004. doi: 10.1007/s00277-011-1274-4. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
3
Aging in a cultural context: cross-national differences in disability and the moderating role of personal control among older adults in the United States and England.文化背景下的衰老:美国和英国老年人残疾的跨国差异以及个人控制的调节作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Jul;66(4):457-67. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr054. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
4
A brief historical and theoretical perspective on patient autonomy and medical decision making: Part II: The autonomy model.关于患者自主性和医疗决策的简要历史和理论视角:第二部分:自主性模型。
Chest. 2011 Jun;139(6):1491-1497. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0516.
5
The Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long term Evaluation of Survivorship registry: scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts.《患者初始治疗后报告的结局和长期生存评估登记研究:为癌症生存者队列的生理和心理社会结局研究构建基础设施的范围、原理和设计》
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Sep;47(14):2188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.034. Epub 2011 May 27.
6
Diverging trends in incidence and mortality, and improved survival of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, in the Netherlands, 1989-2007.荷兰 1989-2007 年非霍奇金淋巴瘤发病率和死亡率的变化趋势及生存率的提高。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Jan;23(1):171-182. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr055. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
7
A brief historical and theoretical perspective on patient autonomy and medical decision making: Part I: The beneficence model.患者自主与医疗决策的简要历史与理论透视:第一部分:有利原则模式。
Chest. 2011 Mar;139(3):669-673. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-2532.
8
Impact of melanoma on patients' lives among 562 survivors: a Dutch population-based study.562名黑色素瘤幸存者中黑色素瘤对患者生活的影响:一项基于荷兰人群的研究。
Arch Dermatol. 2011 Feb;147(2):177-85. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.433.
9
The practice of markets in Dutch health care: are we drinking from the same glass?荷兰医疗保健领域的市场实践:我们喝的是同一杯水吗?
Health Econ Policy Law. 2011 Jan;6(1):139-45. doi: 10.1017/S1744133110000368.
10
The Netherlands: health system review.荷兰:卫生系统综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(1):v-xxvii, 1-228.

评估荷兰非霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者与美国幸存者之间的癌症影响:一项跨国研究。

Assessing the impact of cancer among Dutch non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors compared with their American counterparts: a cross-national study.

机构信息

Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2013 Jun;22(6):1258-65. doi: 10.1002/pon.3131. Epub 2012 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1002/pon.3131
PMID:22833503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3526683/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To understand cultural differences in the impact of cancer (IOC) by (i) performing an independent psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the Impact of Cancer Scale version 2 (IOCv2) in a non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) sample and (ii) examining differences between Dutch and American NHL survivors in perceived IOC and identifying associations with socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.

METHODS

Data collected from 491 Dutch and 738 American NHL survivors were used in this study. IOCv2 responses were obtained from all survivors; the Dutch survivors also completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core questionnaire, which measures quality of life.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis of the Dutch version yielded a factor solution similar to the American structure but with some subscales merging into single factors. Internal consistency was good; Cronbach's alpha was 0.88 for the Positive and 0.94 for the Negative summary scales. Large differences were observed between survivors, whereby Dutch survivors reported fewer Positive (Δ -0.4, p < 0.001, effect size: 0.27) and more Negative (Δ 0.2, p ≤ 0.001, effect size: 0.13) impacts of cancer independent of socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Similar impact domains of the IOCv2 were observed in the Dutch sample, providing evidence that IOCv2 scales measure common and important survivor concerns across two different Western nations. Higher positive impacts for US survivors might be explained by more personal control and availability of supportive services. Future research should focus on determinants of the IOC in both Dutch and American survivors to gain better understanding of the factors that might improve it and suggest how health care may be modified toward that end.

摘要

目的

通过(i)在非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)样本中对荷兰语版癌症影响量表 2 版(IOCv2)进行独立的心理计量评估,以及(ii)检查荷兰和美国 NHL 幸存者在感知癌症影响方面的差异,并确定与社会人口统计学和临床特征的关联,了解癌症影响的文化差异。

方法

本研究使用了来自 491 名荷兰和 738 名美国 NHL 幸存者的数据。所有幸存者都获得了 IOCv2 的反应;荷兰幸存者还完成了欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷,该问卷用于衡量生活质量。

结果

荷兰语版的探索性因素分析得出的因子解决方案与美国结构相似,但有些子量表合并为单个因子。内部一致性良好;阳性和阴性综合量表的 Cronbach's alpha 分别为 0.88 和 0.94。幸存者之间存在很大差异,荷兰幸存者报告的癌症阳性影响较小(Δ-0.4,p<0.001,效应大小:0.27),而负面影响较大(Δ0.2,p≤0.001,效应大小:0.13),独立于社会人口统计学和临床特征。

结论

在荷兰样本中观察到 IOCv2 的相似影响领域,这表明 IOCv2 量表在两个不同的西方国家测量了共同且重要的幸存者关注点。美国幸存者的阳性影响较高可能是由于个人控制和支持性服务的可用性较高。未来的研究应集中于荷兰和美国幸存者的 IOC 决定因素,以更好地了解可能改善其的因素,并提出如何为此目的修改医疗保健。