• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does the relationship between prenatal care and birth weight vary by oral clefts? evidence using South American and United States samples.产前护理与出生体重的关系是否因口腔裂不同而异?使用南美洲和美国样本的证据。
J Pediatr. 2013 Jan;162(1):42-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.06.040. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
2
Impact of Prenatal Care on Newborn Complications for Infants with Cleft Lip with or Without Cleft Palate.产前护理对伴有或不伴有腭裂的唇裂婴儿新生儿并发症的影响。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Jun;61(6):1041-1051. doi: 10.1177/10556656231153453. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
3
Dose-dependent effect of folic acid on the prevention of orofacial clefts.叶酸预防口腔颌面裂隙的剂量依赖性效应。
Pediatrics. 1999 Dec;104(6):e66. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.6.e66.
4
Epidemiology of oral clefts in a large South American sample.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991 Oct;28(4):373-6; discussion 376-7. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1991_028_0373_eoocia_2.3.co_2.
5
Orofacial clefts in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2004.1997 - 2004年国家出生缺陷预防研究中的口腔面部裂隙
Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Jun;149A(6):1149-58. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32854.
6
Undetected anomalies in foetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of isolated cleft.产前诊断为单纯腭裂胎儿的未检测到的异常情况。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Dec;49(12):1576-1583. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
7
Cleft Lip and/or Palate in Infants Prenatally Exposed to Opioids.产前暴露于阿片类药物的婴儿的唇裂和/或腭裂
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Apr;59(4):513-521. doi: 10.1177/10556656211013687. Epub 2021 May 7.
8
Epidemiology of orofacial clefts in a Danish county over 35 years - Before and after implementation of a prenatal screening programme for congenital anomalies.丹麦某郡35年间口面部裂隙的流行病学——先天性异常产前筛查项目实施前后
Eur J Med Genet. 2018 Sep;61(9):489-492. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.05.016.
9
Prenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1998-2004.1998 - 2004年国家出生缺陷预防研究中口面部裂的产前诊断
Prenat Diagn. 2009 Sep;29(9):833-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.2293.
10
[Epidemiology of orofacial clefts (1995-2006) in France (Congenital Malformations of Alsace Registry)].[法国(阿尔萨斯先天性畸形登记处)口面部裂隙的流行病学研究(1995 - 2006年)]
Arch Pediatr. 2012 Oct;19(10):1021-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Gestational age and birth weight variations in young children with language impairment at an early communication intervention clinic.早期沟通干预诊所中语言障碍幼儿的孕周和出生体重差异
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2018 Sep 17;65(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v65i1.584.
2
Individual deprivation, regional deprivation, and risk for oral clefts in Argentina.阿根廷的个体贫困、地区贫困与腭裂风险。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018 Feb 19;41:e110. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.110.
3
Explaining ethnic disparities in preterm birth in Argentina and Ecuador.解释阿根廷和厄瓜多尔早产的种族差异。
Glob Public Health. 2018 Aug;13(8):1126-1143. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2016.1251603. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
4
The impact of unemployment cycles on child and maternal health in Argentina.失业周期对阿根廷母婴健康的影响。
Int J Public Health. 2017 Mar;62(2):197-207. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0857-1. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
5
Explaining racial disparities in infant health in Brazil.解释巴西婴儿健康方面的种族差异。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Oct;105 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S575-84, S563-74. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301021r.
6
A comparative analysis of prenatal care and fetal growth in eight South American countries.八个南美国家产前护理与胎儿生长的比较分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 13;9(3):e91292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091292. eCollection 2014.
7
Explaining racial disparities in infant health in Brazil.解释巴西婴儿健康方面的种族差异。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Sep;103(9):1675-84. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301021. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of systematic pediatric care on neonatal mortality and hospitalizations of infants born with oral clefts.系统儿科护理对患有口腔裂的新生儿死亡率和住院率的影响。
BMC Pediatr. 2011 Dec 28;11:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-121.
2
Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences.唇腭裂:了解遗传和环境的影响。
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Mar;12(3):167-78. doi: 10.1038/nrg2933.
3
Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006.2004 - 2006年美国部分出生缺陷的最新全国出生患病率估计
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010 Dec;88(12):1008-16. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20735. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
4
Folic acid and orofacial clefts: a review of the evidence.叶酸与口腔颌面部裂:证据回顾。
Oral Dis. 2010 Jan;16(1):11-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01587.x.
5
Hospital use and associated costs of children aged zero-to-two years with craniofacial malformations in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州0至2岁颅面畸形儿童的医院使用情况及相关费用。
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009 Nov;85(11):925-34. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20635.
6
A cohort study of recurrence patterns among more than 54,000 relatives of oral cleft cases in Denmark: support for the multifactorial threshold model of inheritance.丹麦一项超过 54000 名唇腭裂病例亲属的复发模式队列研究:对多因素阈值遗传模型的支持。
J Med Genet. 2010 Mar;47(3):162-8. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.069385. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
7
Cleft lip and palate.唇腭裂。
Lancet. 2009 Nov 21;374(9703):1773-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
8
The impact of orofacial clefts on quality of life and healthcare use and costs.口腔颌面裂对生活质量以及医疗保健的使用和成本的影响。
Oral Dis. 2010 Jan;16(1):3-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01588.x. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
9
Genetic Factors and Orofacial Clefting.遗传因素与口面部裂
Semin Orthod. 2008 Jun;14(2):103-114. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2008.02.002.
10
Prenatal care effectiveness and utilization in Brazil.巴西的产前护理效果与利用情况
Health Policy Plan. 2009 May;24(3):175-88. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp005. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

产前护理与出生体重的关系是否因口腔裂不同而异?使用南美洲和美国样本的证据。

Does the relationship between prenatal care and birth weight vary by oral clefts? evidence using South American and United States samples.

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2013 Jan;162(1):42-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.06.040. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.06.040
PMID:22835882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3485451/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if the association between prenatal care use and birth weight (BW) varies for infants with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P), classified into isolated and non-isolated forms, compared with unaffected infants.

STUDY DESIGN

The study employed 2 datasets. The first included a multi-country sample of 2405 infants with CL/P and 24046 infants without CL/P born in 1996-2007 in South America. The second was a sample of 2122 infants with CL/P and 297415 without CL/P from the United States 2004 natality dataset. Separate analyses were performed for the South American and United States samples. The association between prenatal care and BW was evaluated separately for isolated CL/P, non-isolated CL/P, and unaffected infants using regression models adjusting for several background characteristics.

RESULTS

Prenatal care was associated with improved BW for all infant groups, with greater BW increases for infants with CL/P particularly non-isolated forms. In the South American sample, BW increased by 108, 69, and 40 g on average per prenatal visit for infants with non-isolated CL/P, infants with isolated CL/P, and unaffected infants, respectively. In the United States sample, BW increased by 51, 21, and 16 g on average per prenatal visit for these infant groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal care was associated with larger BW increases for pregnancies complicated with CL/P, particularly non-isolated forms, compared with unaffected pregnancies. Given that reduced BW is a well-recognized comorbidity of CL/P, the findings highlight the importance of prenatal care for at-risk pregnancies as a tertiary-prevention intervention to reduce the health burden of CL/P.

摘要

目的

评估在唇裂和/或腭裂(CL/P)婴儿中,产前保健的使用与出生体重(BW)的关联是否因单纯性和非单纯性 CL/P 而有所不同,与无 CL/P 的婴儿进行比较。

研究设计

本研究使用了两个数据集。第一个数据集包括 1996 年至 2007 年在南美洲出生的 2405 例单纯性和非单纯性 CL/P 婴儿以及 24046 例无 CL/P 婴儿的多国家样本。第二个数据集是美国 2004 年出生数据集中的 2122 例 CL/P 婴儿和 297415 例无 CL/P 婴儿的样本。分别对南美洲和美国的样本进行了分析。使用回归模型,根据几个背景特征,分别对单纯性 CL/P、非单纯性 CL/P 和无 CL/P 的婴儿进行了产前保健与 BW 之间的关联评估。

结果

产前保健与所有婴儿组的 BW 增加有关,特别是非单纯性 CL/P 婴儿的 BW 增加更为显著。在南美洲样本中,非单纯性 CL/P、单纯性 CL/P 和无 CL/P 的婴儿平均每次产前检查 BW 分别增加 108、69 和 40 克。在美国样本中,这些婴儿组平均每次产前检查 BW 分别增加 51、21 和 16 克。

结论

与无 CL/P 的妊娠相比,CL/P 妊娠,特别是非单纯性 CL/P,与更大的 BW 增加相关。鉴于 BW 降低是 CL/P 的一种公认的合并症,这些发现强调了产前保健对高危妊娠的重要性,作为减少 CL/P 健康负担的三级预防干预措施。