Gibson D R
Langley Porter Institute, University of California, San Francisco 94143.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Dec;59(6):1296-300. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1296.
This study examined the relation of the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) to stages of logical and sociomoral judgment. Logical judgment was measured using adaptations of the pendulum and correlations tasks of Inhelder and Piaget; moral judgment was scored using the standard Kohlberg interview. In a sample of 143 adults, logical and sociomoral judgment were correlated .30 to .50 with most of the Class I (Factor 2) CPI scales, those capturing social poise and interpersonal adequacy, and Class III (Factor 3) CPI scales, those capturing achievement potential and intellectual efficiency. The findings offer support for a cognitive interpretation of competence and ego development.
本研究考察了加利福尼亚心理调查表（CPI）与逻辑及社会道德判断阶段之间的关系。逻辑判断通过对英海尔德和皮亚杰的钟摆及相关任务进行改编来测量；道德判断采用标准的科尔伯格访谈进行评分。在143名成年人的样本中，逻辑和社会道德判断与大多数I类（因素2）CPI量表（即那些体现社会风度和人际适应能力的量表）以及III类（因素3）CPI量表（即那些体现成就潜力和智力效率的量表）的相关性在0.30至0.50之间。这些发现为能力和自我发展的认知解释提供了支持。
