Department of Biomaterials, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Box 412, 405 30, Sweden.
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013 Feb;101(2):465-71. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34358. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
Osseointegration of surface-modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants was studied in vivo. A total of 18 cylinder-shaped PEEK implants were inserted in the femurs of nine New Zealand rabbits; half were coated with nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (nanoHA) and half were uncoated controls. Healing time was 6 weeks. Samples were retrieved with the implant and surrounding tissue, processed to cut and ground sections, and analyzed histomorphometrically. The implant surfaces were analyzed with optical interferometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). NanoHA-coated PEEK surfaces had lower height deviation (Sa) than controls [mean ± SD: 0.41 μm (± 0.14) vs. 0.96 μm (± 0.28)]. SEM images showed the nanoHA crystals as a thin layer on the polymer surface. XPS analysis of the coated implants showed a Ca/P ratio of 1.67. Histomorphometry indicated that the nanoHA-coated implants had more bone-to-implant contact [16% (± 4.7) vs. 13% (± 9.3)] and more bone area [52% (± 9.5) vs. 45% (± 11.9)]. We found no difference between smooth nanoHA-coated cylinder-shaped PEEK implants and uncoated controls. However, higher mean bone-to-implant contact indicated better osseointegration in the coated implants than in the uncoated controls. The large number of lost implants was interpreted as a lack of primary stability due to implant design.
对表面改性聚醚醚酮(PEEK)植入物的骨整合进行了体内研究。共将 18 个圆柱形 PEEK 植入物插入 9 只新西兰兔的股骨中;一半用纳米晶羟基磷灰石(nanoHA)涂层,一半为未涂层对照。愈合时间为 6 周。用植入物和周围组织取出样本,进行切割和研磨切片处理,并进行组织形态计量学分析。使用光学干涉仪、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、原子力显微镜和 X 射线光电子能谱(XPS)对植入物表面进行分析。nanoHA 涂层的 PEEK 表面比对照组的高度偏差(Sa)低[平均值±标准差:0.41μm(±0.14)比 0.96μm(±0.28)]。SEM 图像显示纳米 HA 晶体为聚合物表面的一层薄涂层。涂层植入物的 XPS 分析表明 Ca/P 比为 1.67。组织形态计量学表明,纳米 HA 涂层植入物的骨与植入物接触更多[16%(±4.7)比 13%(±9.3)],骨面积更多[52%(±9.5)比 45%(±11.9)]。我们发现光滑纳米 HA 涂层圆柱形 PEEK 植入物与未涂层对照组之间没有差异。然而,较高的平均骨与植入物接触表明涂层植入物的骨整合比未涂层对照组更好。大量植入物丢失被解释为由于植入物设计缺乏初始稳定性。