• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非论证性的照片(或文字)夸大了真实性。

Nonprobative photographs (or words) inflate truthiness.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):969-74. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0292-0.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-012-0292-0
PMID:22869334
Abstract

When people evaluate claims, they often rely on what comedian Stephen Colbert calls "truthiness," or subjective feelings of truth. In four experiments, we examined the impact of nonprobative information on truthiness. In Experiments 1A and 1B, people saw familiar and unfamiliar celebrity names and, for each, quickly responded "true" or "false" to the (between-subjects) claim "This famous person is alive" or "This famous person is dead." Within subjects, some of the names appeared with a photo of the celebrity engaged in his or her profession, whereas other names appeared alone. For unfamiliar celebrity names, photos increased the likelihood that the subjects would judge the claim to be true. Moreover, the same photos inflated the subjective truth of both the "alive" and "dead" claims, suggesting that photos did not produce an "alive bias" but rather a "truth bias." Experiment 2 showed that photos and verbal information similarly inflated truthiness, suggesting that the effect is not peculiar to photographs per se. Experiment 3 demonstrated that nonprobative photos can also enhance the truthiness of general knowledge claims (e.g., Giraffes are the only mammals that cannot jump). These effects add to a growing literature on how nonprobative information can inflate subjective feelings of truth.

摘要

当人们评估说法时,他们常常依赖于喜剧演员斯蒂芬·科尔伯特(Stephen Colbert)所谓的“真实性”,或者说对真实性的主观感受。在四项实验中,我们研究了非概率信息对真实性的影响。在实验 1A 和 1B 中,人们看到了熟悉和不熟悉的名人名字,并对每个名字快速做出“是”或“否”的反应,反应的内容是(被试间)“这个名人还活着”或“这个名人已经去世”。在实验 1A 和 1B 中,主体内的一些名字旁边会出现名人从事其职业的照片,而其他名字则单独出现。对于不熟悉的名人名字,照片增加了被试判断说法为真的可能性。此外,同样的照片还夸大了“活着”和“去世”说法的主观真实性,这表明照片并没有产生“活着的偏见”,而是产生了“真实性偏见”。实验 2 表明,照片和口头信息同样夸大了真实性,这表明这种效果并非照片本身所特有。实验 3 表明,非概率照片也可以增强一般知识说法的真实性(例如,长颈鹿是唯一不能跳跃的哺乳动物)。这些影响增加了关于非概率信息如何夸大主观真实性的不断增长的文献。

相似文献

1
Nonprobative photographs (or words) inflate truthiness.非论证性的照片(或文字)夸大了真实性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):969-74. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0292-0.
2
The effect of nonprobative photographs on truthiness persists over time.非证明性照片对似真性的影响会随着时间持续存在。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Sep;144(1):207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
3
Truthiness and falsiness of trivia claims depend on judgmental contexts.琐事断言的真实性和虚假性取决于判断的背景。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Sep;41(5):1337-48. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000099. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
4
Evidence that photos promote rosiness for claims about the future.有证据表明,照片能为关于未来的主张增添乐观色彩。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Nov;46(8):1223-1233. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0652-5.
5
People with easier to pronounce names promote truthiness of claims.名字更容易发音的人会提升言论的可信度。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e88671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088671. eCollection 2014.
6
Nonprobative photos rapidly lead people to believe claims about their own (and other people's) pasts.无证明力的照片会迅速让人们相信关于他们自己(以及其他人)过去的说法。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Aug;44(6):883-96. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0603-1.
7
The citation effect: In-text citations moderately increase belief in trivia claims.引用效应:文中引用会适度增强对琐碎说法的相信程度。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Sep;179:114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
8
A Picture Corrects a Thousand Words - The Effect of Photos on Veracity Feedback.一图胜千言——图片对真实性反馈的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2024 Oct;125:103758. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103758. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
9
Stable truthiness effect across the lifespan.贯穿一生的稳定的似真性效应。
Dev Psychol. 2022 May;58(5):913-922. doi: 10.1037/dev0001334. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
10
Judging Truth.判断真理。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2020 Jan 4;71:499-515. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Using a signal detection approach to understand the impacts of processing fluency and efficacy on accuracy in misinformation detection.采用信号检测方法来理解信息处理流畅性和有效性对错误信息检测准确性的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 16;15:1417910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417910. eCollection 2024.
2
Human detection of political speech deepfakes across transcripts, audio, and video.跨转录本、音频和视频检测政治演讲深度伪造。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 2;15(1):7629. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51998-z.
3
Knowledge revision processes during reading: How pictures influence the activation of outdated information.

本文引用的文献

1
Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred.想象膨胀:想象一个童年事件会增加对该事件发生的信心。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Jun;3(2):208-14. doi: 10.3758/BF03212420.
2
Different clues from different views: the role of image format in public perceptions of neuroimaging results.不同视角的不同线索:图像格式在公众对神经影像学结果的看法中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):422-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0048-7.
3
Truth from language and truth from fit: the impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth.
阅读过程中的知识修正过程:图片如何影响过时信息的激活。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb;53(2):547-567. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01586-9. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
4
One Dose Is Not Enough: The Beneficial Effect of Corrective COVID-19 Information Is Diminished If Followed by Misinformation.一剂并不够:如果在正确的新冠病毒信息之后接着出现错误信息,其有益效果会减弱。
Soc Media Soc. 2023 Apr 17;9(2):20563051231161298. doi: 10.1177/20563051231161298. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
5
Affectivism about intuitions.直觉情感主义。
Synthese. 2022;200(4):274. doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-03749-0. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
6
Trivially informative semantic context inflates people's confidence they can perform a highly complex skill.微不足道的信息性语义语境会增强人们对自身能够执行一项高度复杂技能的信心。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Mar 16;9(3):211977. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211977. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
COVID-19 myth-busting: an experimental study.新冠疫情谣言破解:一项实验研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 19;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12464-3.
8
Collective memory for American leaders: Measuring recognition for the names and faces of the US presidents.美国人对领袖的集体记忆:对美国总统的姓名和面孔的认知度测量。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 26;16(7):e0255209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255209. eCollection 2021.
9
Autistic Adults May Be Erroneously Perceived as Deceptive and Lacking Credibility.自闭症患者可能会被错误地认为是不可信的骗子。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Feb;52(2):490-507. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-04963-4. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
10
Interdisciplinary Lessons Learned While Researching Fake News.研究假新闻过程中的跨学科经验教训。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 16;11:537612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537612. eCollection 2020.
语言真实与契合真实:语言具体性和解释水平对主观真实的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;36(11):1576-88. doi: 10.1177/0146167210386238. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
4
Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation.团结流利表达的各个群体,形成一个元认知的国度。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2009 Aug;13(3):219-35. doi: 10.1177/1088868309341564. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
5
Evoking false beliefs about autobiographical experience.引发关于自传体经历的错误信念。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):186-90. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.186.
6
Seeing is believing: the effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning.眼见为实:大脑图像对科学推理判断的影响。
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
7
Reversing the truth effect: learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth.逆转真相效应:了解在真相判断中对加工流畅性的解读
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jan;33(1):219-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.219.
8
Memory and reality.记忆与现实。
Am Psychol. 2006 Nov;61(8):760-771. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.760.
9
Making sense of memory.理解记忆。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2005 Sep;59(3):199-208. doi: 10.1037/h0087475.
10
True photographs and false memories.真实的照片与虚假的记忆。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Mar;15(3):149-54. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503002.x.