Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
BMC Med. 2012 Aug 9;10:87. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-87.
There is a plethora of published cancer biomarkers but the reality is that very few, if any, new circulating cancer biomarkers have entered the clinic in the last 30 years. I here try to explain this apparent oxymoron by classifying circulating cancer biomarkers into three categories: fraudulent reports (rare); true discoveries of biomarkers, that then fail to meet the demands of the clinic; and false discoveries, which represent artifactual biomarkers. I further provide examples of combinations of some known cancer biomarkers that can perform well in niche clinical applications, despite individually being not useful.
目前有大量已发表的癌症生物标志物,但实际上,在过去 30 年中,很少有(如果有的话)新的循环癌症生物标志物进入临床应用。在这里,我试图通过将循环癌症生物标志物分为三类来解释这种明显的矛盾:欺诈性报告(罕见);真正发现的生物标志物,然后未能满足临床需求;以及虚假发现,代表人为的生物标志物。我进一步提供了一些已知癌症生物标志物的组合示例,这些标志物在特定的临床应用中表现良好,尽管它们本身并不有用。