Suppr超能文献

利用 Inmedea 模拟器进行外科混合式学习。

Blended learning in surgery using the Inmedea Simulator.

机构信息

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Muenster, Waldeyerstrasse 1, Muenster, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Feb;398(2):335-40. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0987-8. Epub 2012 Aug 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, medical education in surgery has experienced several modifications. We have implemented a blended learning module in our teaching curriculum to evaluate its effectiveness, applicability, and acceptance in surgical education.

METHODS

In this prospective study, the traditional face-to-face learning of our teaching curriculum for fourth-year medical students (n = 116) was augmented by the Inmedea Simulator, a web-based E-learning system, with six virtual patient cases. Student results were documented by the system and learning success was determined by comparing patient cases with comparable diseases (second and sixth case). The acceptance among the students was evaluated with a questionnaire.

RESULTS

After using the Inmedea Simulator, correct diagnoses were found significantly (P < 0.05) more often, while an incomplete diagnostic was seen significantly (P < 0.05) less often. Significant overall improvement (P < 0.05) was seen in sixth case (62.3 ± 5.6 %) vs. second case (53.9 ± 5.6 %). The questionnaire revealed that our students enjoyed the surgical seminar (score 2.1 ± 1.5) and preferred blended learning (score 2.5 ± 1.2) to conventional teaching.

CONCLUSION

The blended learning approach using the Inmedea Simulator was highly appreciated by our medical students and resulted in a significant learning success. Blended learning appears to be a suitable tool to complement traditional teaching in surgery.

摘要

背景

最近,外科学医学教育经历了多次修改。我们在教学课程中实施了混合学习模块,以评估其在外科教育中的有效性、适用性和接受度。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,我们为四年级医学生(n=116)的传统面对面学习增加了 Inmedea 模拟器,这是一个基于网络的电子学习系统,有六个虚拟患者病例。系统记录学生的结果,通过比较具有类似疾病的患者病例(第二和第六个病例)来确定学习成功。学生的接受度通过问卷调查进行评估。

结果

使用 Inmedea 模拟器后,正确诊断的频率明显更高(P<0.05),而不完整诊断的频率明显更低(P<0.05)。第六个病例(62.3±5.6%)的总体改善明显高于第二个病例(53.9±5.6%)(P<0.05)。问卷调查显示,我们的学生喜欢外科研讨会(得分为 2.1±1.5),并更喜欢混合学习(得分为 2.5±1.2)而不是传统教学。

结论

使用 Inmedea 模拟器的混合学习方法受到我们医学生的高度赞赏,并取得了显著的学习成功。混合学习似乎是一种合适的工具,可以补充传统的外科学教学。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验