• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词频、语境多样性和语义独特性对口语词汇识别的影响。

Effects of word frequency, contextual diversity, and semantic distinctiveness on spoken word recognition.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 East 10th Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):EL74-80. doi: 10.1121/1.4731641.

DOI:10.1121/1.4731641
PMID:22894319
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3401190/
Abstract

The relative abilities of word frequency, contextual diversity, and semantic distinctiveness to predict accuracy of spoken word recognition in noise were compared using two data sets. Word frequency is the number of times a word appears in a corpus of text. Contextual diversity is the number of different documents in which the word appears in that corpus. Semantic distinctiveness takes into account the number of different semantic contexts in which the word appears. Semantic distinctiveness and contextual diversity were both able to explain variance above and beyond that explained by word frequency, which by itself explained little unique variance.

摘要

使用两个数据集比较了词频、语境多样性和语义独特性在预测噪声中口语识别准确性方面的相对能力。词频是一个单词在文本语料库中出现的次数。语境多样性是单词在该语料库中出现的不同文档数量。语义独特性考虑了单词出现的不同语义环境数量。语义独特性和语境多样性都能够解释超出词频解释的方差,而词频本身解释的独特方差很小。

相似文献

1
Effects of word frequency, contextual diversity, and semantic distinctiveness on spoken word recognition.词频、语境多样性和语义独特性对口语词汇识别的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):EL74-80. doi: 10.1121/1.4731641.
2
The influence of talker and foreign-accent variability on spoken word identification.说话人及口音变化对口语识别的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Mar;133(3):1677-86. doi: 10.1121/1.4776212.
3
A corpus of noise-induced word misperceptions for Spanish.一个西班牙语的噪声诱发单词误听语料库。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb;137(2):EL184-9. doi: 10.1121/1.4905877.
4
The influence of amplitude envelope information on resolving lexically ambiguous spoken words.振幅包络信息对解决词汇歧义口语词的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Oct;136(4):EL249-55. doi: 10.1121/1.4893331.
5
Measuring effectiveness of semantic cues in degraded English sentences in non-native listeners.测量非母语听者在退化英语句子中语义线索的有效性。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Jan;53(1):30-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.825052. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
6
Use of semantic context and F contours by older listeners during Mandarin speech recognition in quiet and single-talker interference conditions.年长听众在安静和单说话者干扰条件下进行普通话语音识别时对语义语境和F调型的运用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Apr;141(4):EL338. doi: 10.1121/1.4979565.
7
Effects of phonetically-cued talker variation on semantic encoding.语音提示的说话者变化对语义编码的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Dec;134(6):EL485. doi: 10.1121/1.4826151.
8
A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.正常听力的听众在语音频谱噪声中对PB - 50、CID W - 22、NU - 6、W - 1双音节词以及由同一说话者说出的单音节数字的识别性能比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Jun;19(6):496-506. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.6.5.
9
Dynamic re-weighting of acoustic and contextual cues in spoken word recognition.动态重新加权口语识别中的声学和语境线索。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Aug;146(2):EL135. doi: 10.1121/1.5119271.
10
Sizing up the competition: quantifying the influence of the mental lexicon on auditory and visual spoken word recognition.评估竞争:量化心理词汇量对听觉和视觉口语识别的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Sep;130(3):1663-72. doi: 10.1121/1.3613930.

引用本文的文献

1
Word frequency and cognitive effort in turns-at-talk: turn structure affects processing load in natural conversation.轮流交谈中的词频与认知努力:话轮结构影响自然对话中的处理负荷。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 5;15:1208029. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1208029. eCollection 2024.
2
Contextual diversity and anchoring: Null effects on learning word forms and opposing effects on learning word meanings.语境多样性与锚定:对单词形式学习无影响,对单词意义学习有相反影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Nov;77(11):2180-2198. doi: 10.1177/17470218231218990. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
3
Diversity of narrative context disrupts the early stage of learning the meanings of novel words.叙述语境的多样性会扰乱学习新词意义的早期阶段。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Dec;30(6):2338-2350. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02316-z. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
4
Contextual dynamics in lexical encoding across the ageing spectrum: A simulation study.语境动态在老化谱中的词汇编码中:一项模拟研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Sep;76(9):2164-2182. doi: 10.1177/17470218221145685. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
5
Context Availability and Sentence Availability Ratings for 3,000 English Words and their Association with Lexical Processing.3000个英语单词的上下文可用性和句子可用性评级及其与词汇加工的关联
J Cogn. 2022 Mar 9;5(1):20. doi: 10.5334/joc.211. eCollection 2022.
6
Exploring the Relationship Between Fiction Reading and Emotion Recognition.探究小说阅读与情感识别之间的关系。
Affect Sci. 2021 Apr 20;2(2):178-186. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00034-0. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss.语音和语义相似性对背景噪声中听错词的影响:句子语境、年龄和听力损失的作用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Jan;151(1):650. doi: 10.1121/10.0009367.
8
Accounting for item-level variance in recognition memory: Comparing word frequency and contextual diversity.在识别记忆中考虑项目水平的差异:比较词频和语境多样性。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jul;50(5):1013-1032. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01249-z. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
9
Beyond input: Language learners produce novel relative clause types without exposure.超越输入:语言学习者在未接触的情况下产出新颖的关系从句类型。
J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2021;33(5):483-517. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2021.1928678. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
10
The effects of contextual diversity on incidental vocabulary learning in the native and a foreign language.语境多样性对母语和外语附带词汇学习的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 18;10(1):13967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70922-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization.语义多样性在词汇组织中的作用。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Jun;66(2):115-24. doi: 10.1037/a0026727.
2
More data trumps smarter algorithms: comparing pointwise mutual information with latent semantic analysis.更多数据胜过更智能的算法:逐点互信息与潜在语义分析的比较
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Aug;41(3):647-56. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.647.
3
Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.上下文多样性而非词频决定单词命名和词汇判断时间。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):814-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x.
4
The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process.贝叶斯阅读者:将单词识别解释为一个最优贝叶斯决策过程。
Psychol Rev. 2006 Apr;113(2):327-57. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.327.
5
Visual word recognition of single-syllable words.单音节词的视觉单词识别
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):283-316. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283.
6
Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: evidence from eye movements.口语单词识别中频率效应的时间进程:来自眼动的证据。
Cogn Psychol. 2001 Jun;42(4):317-67. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0750.
7
Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.回声之回声?词汇通达的情景理论。
Psychol Rev. 1998 Apr;105(2):251-79. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.251.
8
Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.识别口语单词:邻域激活模型。
Ear Hear. 1998 Feb;19(1):1-36. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001.
9
Word-frequency effect and response bias.词频效应与反应偏差。
Psychol Rev. 1967 Jan;74(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/h0024206.
10
The TRACE model of speech perception.言语感知的TRACE模型。
Cogn Psychol. 1986 Jan;18(1):1-86. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0.