Suppr超能文献

使用龋病风险评估软件(Cariogram)对年轻成年人进行龋病风险评估的效率。

Efficiency of caries risk assessment in young adults using Cariogram.

作者信息

Celik Esra Uzer, Gokay Necmi, Ates Mustafa

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, TURKIYE.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2012 Jul;6(3):270-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

THE AIMS OF THIS STUDY WERE TO: (1) evaluate the caries risk in young adults using Cariogram and (2) compare the efficiency of Cariogram with the regression risk models created using the same variables in Cariogram by examining the actual caries progression over a 2-year period.

METHODS

This study included 100 subjects that were either twenty or twenty-one years-old. Data on general health, diet, oral hygiene and use of fluoride were obtained. Saliva analyses were performed, including mutans streptococci and lactobacilli counts, secretion rate and buffer capacity. DMFT and DMFS values were calculated by clinical examinations and radiographs. The participants were divided into 5 groups according to their Cariogram caries risk scores at baseline. Re-examination for caries was done after 2-years. The data were analyzed using Kruskall Wallis, Mann Whitney-U, and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Diet frequency, plaque amount and secretion rate were significantly associated with caries increment (P<.05). Cariogram and the regression risk models explained the caries formation at a higher rate than single-variables. However, the regression risk model developed by diet frequency, plaque amount and secretion rate explained the caries formation similar to Cariogram, while the other regression model developed by all variables used in Cariogram explained the caries formation at a higher rate than this computer program.

CONCLUSIONS

Cariogram is effective and can be used for caries risk assessment instead of single variables; however, it is possible to develop simplier models with regression analyses to determine caries risk.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在:(1)使用龋病预测软件(Cariogram)评估年轻成年人的龋病风险;(2)通过观察两年内的实际龋病进展情况,比较Cariogram与使用Cariogram中相同变量创建的回归风险模型的效率。

方法

本研究纳入了100名年龄在20或21岁的受试者。收集了关于一般健康状况、饮食、口腔卫生和氟化物使用的数据。进行了唾液分析,包括变形链球菌和乳酸杆菌计数、分泌率和缓冲能力。通过临床检查和X线片计算DMFT和DMFS值。根据基线时的Cariogram龋病风险评分将参与者分为5组。2年后进行龋病复查。使用Kruskal Wallis、Mann Whitney - U和逻辑回归分析对数据进行分析。

结果

饮食频率、菌斑量和分泌率与龋病增量显著相关(P <.05)。Cariogram和回归风险模型比单一变量能更好地解释龋病形成。然而,由饮食频率、菌斑量和分泌率建立的回归风险模型对龋病形成的解释与Cariogram相似,而由Cariogram中所有变量建立的另一个回归模型对龋病形成的解释率高于该计算机程序。

结论

Cariogram是有效的,可用于龋病风险评估而非单一变量;然而,通过回归分析有可能开发出更简单的模型来确定龋病风险。

相似文献

4
Evaluation of the Cariogram for root caries prediction.根面龋预测的 Cariogram 评价。
J Dent. 2017 Jul;62:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

7
Are standardised caries risk assessment models effective?标准化龋齿风险评估模型有效吗?
Evid Based Dent. 2018 Dec;19(4):102-103. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401338.

本文引用的文献

1
Caries and background factors in Norwegian and immigrant 5-year-old children.挪威和移民 5 岁儿童的龋齿和背景因素。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;38(1):19-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2009.00502.x. Epub 2009 Oct 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验