INSERM U1039, Faculty of Medicine La Tronche, France.
Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Aug 14;6:59. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00059. eCollection 2012.
Alpha-band activity (8-13 Hz) is not only suppressed by sensory stimulation and movements, but also modulated by attention, working memory and mental tasks, and could be sensitive to higher motor control functions. The aim of the present study was to examine alpha oscillatory activity during the preparation of simple left or right finger movements, contrasting the external and internal mode of action selection. Three preparation conditions were examined using a precueing paradigm with S1 as the preparatory and S2 as the imperative cue: Full, laterality instructed by S1; Free, laterality freely selected and None, laterality instructed by S2. Time-frequency (TF) analysis was performed in the alpha frequency range during the S1-S2 interval, and alpha motor-related amplitude asymmetries (MRAA) were also calculated. The significant MRAA during the Full and Free conditions indicated effective external and internal motor response preparation. In the absence of specific motor preparation (None), a posterior alpha event-related desynchronization (ERD) dominated, reflecting the main engagement of attentional resources. In Full and Free motor preparation, posterior alpha ERD was accompanied by a midparietal alpha event-related synchronization (ERS), suggesting a concomitant inhibition of task-irrelevant visual activity. In both Full and Free motor preparation, analysis of alpha power according to MRAA amplitude revealed two types of functional activation patterns: (1) a motor alpha pattern, with predominantly midparietal alpha ERS and large MRAA corresponding to lateralized motor activation/visual inhibition and (2) an attentional alpha pattern, with dominating right posterior alpha ERD and small MRAA reflecting visuospatial attention. The present results suggest that alpha oscillatory patterns do not resolve the selection mode of action, but rather distinguish separate functional strategies of motor preparation.
α 波段活动(8-13Hz)不仅受到感觉刺激和运动的抑制,还受到注意力、工作记忆和心理任务的调节,并且可能对更高的运动控制功能敏感。本研究旨在检查在准备简单的左或右手指运动期间的α 振荡活动,对比外部和内部动作选择模式。使用 S1 作为预备和 S2 作为命令提示的预备提示范式检查了三种准备条件:完全,由 S1 指示的侧性;自由,由个体自由选择的侧性;无,由 S2 指示的侧性。在 S1-S2 间隔期间进行了时间频率(TF)分析,并计算了α 运动相关振幅不对称(MRAA)。在完全和自由条件下的显著 MRAA 表明有效的外部和内部运动反应准备。在没有特定运动准备(无)的情况下,以主要注意力资源参与为主的后α 事件相关去同步(ERD)占主导地位。在完全和自由运动准备中,后α ERD 伴随着中顶叶α 事件相关同步(ERS),表明同时抑制了无关的视觉活动。在完全和自由运动准备中,根据 MRAA 幅度分析α 功率揭示了两种类型的功能激活模式:(1)运动α 模式,主要表现为中顶叶α ERS 和大的 MRAA,对应于侧化运动激活/视觉抑制;(2)注意α 模式,主要表现为右后α ERD 和小的 MRAA,反映了视空间注意。本研究结果表明,α 振荡模式并不能解决动作选择模式,而是区分了运动准备的分离功能策略。