Suppr超能文献

荷兰语版牛津肘关节评分的拉施分析

Rasch analysis of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score.

作者信息

de Haan Jeroen, Schep Niels, Tuinebreijer Wim, Patka Peter, den Hartog Dennis

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Traumatology, Westfriesgasthuis, Hoorn, the Netherlands;

出版信息

Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2011 Jul;2:145-9. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S22257. Epub 2011 Aug 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Oxford elbow score (OES) is a patient-rated, 12-item questionnaire that measures quality of life in relation to elbow disorders. This English questionnaire has been proven to be a reliable and valid instrument. Recently, the OES has been translated into Dutch and examined for its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in a group of Dutch patients with elbow pathology. The aim of this study was to analyze the Dutch version of the OES (OES-DV) in combination with Rasch analysis or the one-parameter item response theory to examine the structure of the questionnaire.

METHODS

The OES-DV was administered to 103 patients (68 female, 35 male). The mean age of the patients was 44.3 ± 14.7 (range 15-75) years. Rasch analysis was performed using the Winsteps(®) Rasch Measurement Version 3.70.1.1 and a rating scale parameterization.

RESULTS

The person separation index, which is a measure of person reliability, was excellent (2.30). All the items of the OES had a reasonable mean square infit or outfit value between 0.6 and 1.7. The threshold of items were ordered, so the categories can function as intended. Principal component analysis of the residuals partly confirmed the multidimensionality of the English version of the OES. The OES distinguished 3.4 strata, which indicates that about three ranges can be differentiated.

CONCLUSION

Rasch analysis of the OES-DV showed that the data fit to the stringent Rasch model. The multidimensionality of the English version of the OES was partly confirmed, and the four items of the function and three items of the pain domain were recognized as separate domains. The category rating scale of the OES-DV works well. The OES can distinguish 3.4 strata. This conclusion can only be applied to elbow dislocations, which were the largest group of patients studied.

摘要

背景

牛津肘关节评分(OES)是一份由患者自评的、包含12个条目的问卷,用于评估与肘关节疾病相关的生活质量。这份英文问卷已被证明是一种可靠且有效的工具。最近,OES已被翻译成荷兰语,并在一组患有肘关节病变的荷兰患者中对其可靠性、有效性和反应性进行了检验。本研究的目的是结合拉施分析或单参数项目反应理论对荷兰语版的OES(OES-DV)进行分析,以检验问卷的结构。

方法

将OES-DV应用于103例患者(68例女性,35例男性)。患者的平均年龄为44.3±14.7岁(范围15 - 75岁)。使用Winsteps(®)拉施测量版本3.70.1.1和等级量表参数化进行拉施分析。

结果

作为衡量个人可靠性的指标,个人分离指数非常出色(2.30)。OES的所有条目均具有介于0.6和1.7之间的合理均方内拟合或外拟合值。条目的阈值是有序的,因此类别能够按预期发挥作用。残差的主成分分析部分证实了英文版OES的多维性。OES区分出3.4个层次,这表明大约可以区分出三个范围。

结论

对OES-DV的拉施分析表明,数据符合严格的拉施模型。英文版OES的多维性得到了部分证实,功能领域的四个条目和疼痛领域的三个条目被识别为单独的领域。OES-DV的类别评定量表效果良好。OES可以区分3.4个层次。该结论仅适用于肘关节脱位患者,这是本研究中最大的患者群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb8/3417930/2419f3e89459/prom-2-145f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验