Farnik Małgorzata, Pierzchała Władys Aw
Department of Pneumonology, Silesian University of Medicine, Katowice, Poland.
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2012 Jul;3:1-7. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S14405. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
Patient-related outcomes measures could provide important information for the current state of the art in medical care and even have an impact on macrodecisions in the health care system. Patient-related outcomes were initially defined as subjective health indicators that allow disability and illness to be assessed, based on patient, caregiver, or physician self-reports. As illness involves psychological and behavioral complex processes of care, a multidisciplinary approach in measuring patient-reported outcomes should be recommended, such as quality of life questionnaires. Patient-related outcomes measures should correspond to specific clinical situations and bring opportunities to improve quality of care. Objective measurements enable quantitative data to be collected and analyzed. Depending on the aim of the research, investigators can use existing methods or develop new tools. This publication presents a methodology for developing patient-related outcomes measures, based on a multistage procedure. The proper definition of specific study objectives and the methodology of instrument development are crucial for successfully transferring the study concept. The model of instrument development is the process of starting from the preliminary phase and includes questionnaire design and scaling, pilot testing (cognitive debriefing), revision of the preliminary version, evaluation of the new tool, and implementation. Validation of the new instrument includes reliability, reproducibility, internal consistency, and responsiveness. The process of designing the new tool should involve a panel of experts, including clinicians, psychologists (preliminary phase), and statisticians (scale development and scoring), and patients (cognitive debriefing). Implementation of a new tool should be followed by evaluation study - assessment of the tool's usefulness in clinical practice. An instrument must show not only the expected methodological properties and performance but also a positive contribution to care. The necessity of implementation of direct patient-reporting methods has been highlighted by both the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.
患者相关结局指标可为当前医疗领域的技术水平提供重要信息,甚至会对医疗保健系统的宏观决策产生影响。患者相关结局最初被定义为主观健康指标,可基于患者、护理人员或医生的自我报告来评估残疾和疾病情况。由于疾病涉及心理和行为方面复杂的护理过程,因此建议采用多学科方法来测量患者报告的结局,例如生活质量问卷。患者相关结局指标应与特定临床情况相对应,并为改善护理质量带来机会。客观测量能够收集和分析定量数据。根据研究目的,研究人员可以使用现有方法或开发新工具。本出版物介绍了一种基于多阶段程序来开发患者相关结局指标的方法。明确界定具体的研究目标以及工具开发方法对于成功转化研究概念至关重要。工具开发模型是从初步阶段开始的过程,包括问卷设计与量表制定、预试验(认知反馈)、初步版本修订、新工具评估以及实施。新工具的验证包括信度、可重复性、内部一致性和反应性。设计新工具的过程应包括一个专家小组,其中有临床医生、心理学家(初步阶段)、统计学家(量表开发与评分)以及患者(认知反馈)。新工具实施后应进行评估研究——评估该工具在临床实践中的实用性。一种工具不仅必须具备预期的方法学特性和性能,还必须对护理有积极贡献价值。美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局都强调了实施直接患者报告方法的必要性。