Suppr超能文献

个人健康记录安全吗?对免费网络可访问的个人健康记录隐私政策的综述。

Are personal health records safe? A review of free web-accessible personal health record privacy policies.

作者信息

Carrión Señor Inmaculada, Fernández-Alemán José Luis, Toval Ambrosio

机构信息

Department of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2012 Aug 23;14(4):e114. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1904.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several obstacles prevent the adoption and use of personal health record (PHR) systems, including users' concerns regarding the privacy and security of their personal health information.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the privacy and security characteristics of PHR privacy policies. It is hoped that identification of the strengths and weaknesses of the PHR systems will be useful for PHR users, health care professionals, decision makers, and designers.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review using the principal databases related to health and computer science to discover the Web-based and free PHR systems mentioned in published articles. The privacy policy of each PHR system selected was reviewed to extract its main privacy and security characteristics.

RESULTS

The search of databases and the myPHR website provided a total of 52 PHR systems, of which 24 met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 17 (71%) allowed users to manage their data and to control access to their health care information. Only 9 (38%) PHR systems permitted users to check who had accessed their data. The majority of PHR systems used information related to the users' accesses to monitor and analyze system use, 12 (50%) of them aggregated user information to publish trends, and 20 (83%) used diverse types of security measures. Finally, 15 (63%) PHR systems were based on regulations or principles such as the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode).

CONCLUSIONS

Most privacy policies of PHR systems do not provide an in-depth description of the security measures that they use. Moreover, compliance with standards and regulations in PHR systems is still low.

摘要

背景

有几个障碍阻碍了个人健康记录(PHR)系统的采用和使用,包括用户对其个人健康信息隐私和安全的担忧。

目的

分析PHR隐私政策的隐私和安全特征。希望识别PHR系统的优缺点对PHR用户、医疗保健专业人员、决策者和设计者有用。

方法

我们使用与健康和计算机科学相关的主要数据库进行了系统综述,以发现已发表文章中提到的基于网络的免费PHR系统。对所选的每个PHR系统的隐私政策进行审查,以提取其主要隐私和安全特征。

结果

对数据库和myPHR网站的搜索共提供了52个PHR系统,其中24个符合我们的纳入标准。其中,17个(71%)允许用户管理自己的数据并控制对其医疗保健信息的访问。只有9个(38%)PHR系统允许用户查看谁访问了他们的数据。大多数PHR系统使用与用户访问相关的信息来监控和分析系统使用情况,其中12个(50%)汇总用户信息以发布趋势,20个(83%)使用了多种安全措施。最后,15个(63%)PHR系统基于美国《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)和《网络健康基金会行为准则》(HONcode)等法规或原则。

结论

PHR系统的大多数隐私政策没有对其使用的安全措施进行深入描述。此外,PHR系统对标准和法规的遵守程度仍然很低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/241a/3510685/8aa19c30ca9c/jmir_v14i4e114_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验