School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Mary's Quad, St Andrews KY16 9JP, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Oct 5;367(1603):2743-52. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0222.
Differences between individuals are the raw material from which theories of the evolution and ontogeny of cognition are built. For example, when 4-year-old children pass a test requiring them to communicate the content of another's falsely held belief, while 3-year-olds fail, we know that something must change over the course of the third year of life. In the search for what develops or evolves, the typical route is to probe the extents and limits of successful individuals' ability. Another is to focus on those that failed, and find out what difference or lack prevented them from passing the task. Recent research in developmental psychology has harnessed individual differences to illuminate the cognitive mechanisms that emerge to enable success. We apply this approach to explaining some of the failures made by chimpanzees when using tools to solve problems. Twelve of 16 chimpanzees failed to discriminate between a complete and a broken tool when, after being set down, the ends of the broken one were aligned in front of them. There was a correlation between performance on this aligned task and another in which after being set down, the centre of both tools was covered, suggesting that the limiting factor was not the representation of connection, but memory or attention. Some chimpanzees that passed the aligned task passed a task in which the location of the broken tool was never visible but had to be inferred.
个体差异是构建认知进化和个体发生理论的原材料。例如,当 4 岁的儿童通过一项需要他们传达他人错误信念内容的测试时,而 3 岁的儿童则失败了,我们就知道在生命的第三年一定发生了某些变化。在寻找发展或进化的过程中,典型的方法是探究成功个体能力的范围和极限。另一种方法是关注那些失败的人,并找出阻止他们通过任务的差异或缺乏。发展心理学的最近研究利用个体差异来阐明出现的认知机制,以实现成功。我们将这种方法应用于解释黑猩猩在使用工具解决问题时所犯的一些错误。16 只黑猩猩中有 12 只无法区分完整工具和破损工具,当工具被放置在地上后,破损工具的末端在它们面前对齐。在这项对齐任务上的表现与另一项任务相关联,在另一项任务中,在工具的中心被盖住后,提示说限制因素不是连接的表示,而是记忆或注意力。一些通过对齐任务的黑猩猩通过了一项任务,在这项任务中,破损工具的位置从未可见,但必须推断出来。