Suppr超能文献

急性阑尾炎:立场文件,WSES,2013 年。

Acute appendicitis: position paper, WSES, 2013.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, ULSS19 del Veneto, Piazzale Etruschi, 9, Adria 45011, RO, Italy.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2014 Apr 7;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-26.

Abstract

Appendectomy is one of the most frequently performed operative procedures in general surgery departments of every size and category. Laparoscopic Appendectomy - LA - as compared to Open Appendectomy - OA - was very controversial at first but has found increasing acceptance all over the World, although the percentage of its acceptance is different in the various single National setting. Various meta-analyses and Cochrane reviews have compared LA with OA and different technical details. Furthermore, new surgical methods have recently emerged, namely, the single-port/incision laparoscopic appendectomy and NOTES technique. Their distribution among the hospitals, however, is unclear. Using laparoscopic mini-instruments with trocars of 2-3.5 mm diameter is proposed as a reliable alternative due to less postoperative pain and improved aesthetics. How to proceed in case of an inconspicuous appendix during a procedure planned as an appendectomy remains controversial despite existing study results. But the main question still is: operate or not operate an acute appendicitis, in the meaning of an attempt of a conservative antibiotic therapy. Therefore, we have done a literature survey on the performance of appendectomies and their technical details as well as the management of the intraoperative finding of an inconspicuous appendix in order to write down - under the light of the latest evidence - a position paper.

摘要

阑尾切除术是普外科中最常施行的手术之一,无论手术规模大小和类型如何均是如此。与开腹阑尾切除术(Open Appendectomy,OA)相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术(Laparoscopic Appendectomy,LA)最初存在很大争议,但现已在全球范围内得到越来越多的认可,尽管在不同的单一国家环境中其接受率有所不同。各种荟萃分析和 Cochrane 综述比较了 LA 与 OA 以及不同的技术细节。此外,最近出现了新的手术方法,即单孔/切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术和NOTES 技术。然而,这些技术在医院中的分布情况尚不清楚。使用直径为 2-3.5 毫米的腹腔镜迷你器械和套管针被认为是一种可靠的替代方法,因为它术后疼痛较轻且美容效果更佳。尽管现有研究结果存在,但在计划进行阑尾切除术的手术中,如果阑尾不明显,如何处理仍然存在争议。但主要问题仍然是:对于急性阑尾炎,是否进行手术(即尝试保守的抗生素治疗)。因此,我们对阑尾切除术的操作及其技术细节以及术中发现不明显阑尾的处理进行了文献调查,以便根据最新证据撰写一份立场文件。

相似文献

1
Acute appendicitis: position paper, WSES, 2013.
World J Emerg Surg. 2014 Apr 7;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-26.
2
Appendectomy in Germany-an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;28(1):127-38. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1573-9. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
3
Transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a reliable one-port procedure.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1115-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1326-1. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
5
Is mini-laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for children.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004 Apr;14(2):61-5. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200404000-00003.
6
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparative study of 2,332 cases.
World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):750-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0699-8.
7
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.
Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310022003.
9
Laparoscopy in the contemporary management of acute appendicitis.
Am J Surg. 2007 Mar;193(3):310-3; discussion 313-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.025.
10
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

2
Spinal/epidural block as an alternative to general anesthesia for laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Jun;13(2):148-156. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.72684. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
Morbidity and mortality rates after emergency abdominal surgery: an analysis of 4346 patients scheduled for emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Jun;402(4):615-623. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1493-1. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
5
Important CT findings for prediction of severe appendicitis: involvement of retroperitoneal space.
World J Emerg Surg. 2014 Dec 17;9(1):62. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-62. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Thirty-day outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in elderly using ACS/NSQIP database.
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1061-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2557-0. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
2
A review of minimally invasive single-port/incision laparoscopic appendectomy.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Sep;22(7):641-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0237.
3
Appendectomy in Germany-an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;28(1):127-38. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1573-9. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
5
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in obese patients: outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jul;215(1):88-99; discussion 99-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 May 24.
7
Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database.
Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2353-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2188-5. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
8
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for appendicitis in elderly patients.
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011 Oct;27(5):241-5. doi: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.241. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in the obese population.
Am J Surg. 2011 Dec;202(6):733-8; discussion 738-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.034. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验