Department of Pediatrics, Division of Academic General Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36(1):70-6. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0609. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
The objective of this study was to determine potential added value of novel risk factors in predicting the development of type 2 diabetes beyond that provided by standard clinical risk factors.
The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study is a population-based prospective cohort study in four U.S. communities. Novel risk factors were either measured in the full cohort or in a case-control sample nested within the cohort. We started with a basic prediction model, previously validated in ARIC, and evaluated 35 novel risk factors by adding them independently to the basic model. The area under the curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination index (IDI) were calculated to determine if each of the novel risk factors improved risk prediction.
There were 1,457 incident cases of diabetes with a mean of >7.6 years of follow-up among 12,277 participants at risk. None of the novel risk factors significantly improved the AUC. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s was the only novel risk factor that resulted in a significant NRI (0.54%; 95% CI: 0.33-0.86%). Adiponectin, leptin, γ-glutamyl transferase, ferritin, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, complement C3, white blood cell count, albumin, activated partial thromboplastin time, factor VIII, magnesium, hip circumference, heart rate, and a genetic risk score each significantly improved the IDI, but net changes were small.
Evaluation of a large panel of novel risk factors for type 2 diabetes indicated only small improvements in risk prediction, which are unlikely to meaningfully alter clinical risk reclassification or discrimination strategies.
本研究旨在确定新型风险因素在预测 2 型糖尿病发展方面的潜在附加价值,这些因素超越了标准临床风险因素所提供的价值。
动脉粥样硬化风险社区(ARIC)研究是一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,在美国四个社区进行。新型风险因素要么在整个队列中测量,要么在嵌套于该队列的病例对照样本中测量。我们从之前在 ARIC 中验证过的基本预测模型开始,通过将 35 种新型风险因素独立添加到基本模型中,对其进行评估。计算曲线下面积(AUC)、净重新分类指数(NRI)和综合鉴别指数(IDI),以确定每种新型风险因素是否改善了风险预测。
在有风险的 12277 名参与者中,有 1457 例糖尿病新发病例,平均随访时间超过 7.6 年。没有一种新型风险因素显著提高 AUC。用力呼气量 1 秒(FEV1)是唯一导致 NRI 显著增加的新型风险因素(0.54%;95%CI:0.33-0.86%)。脂联素、瘦素、γ-谷氨酰转移酶、铁蛋白、细胞间黏附分子 1、补体 C3、白细胞计数、白蛋白、活化部分凝血活酶时间、因子 VIII、镁、臀围、心率和遗传风险评分均显著提高了 IDI,但净变化很小。
对 2 型糖尿病的大量新型风险因素进行评估表明,风险预测仅有微小改善,不太可能显著改变临床风险重新分类或鉴别策略。