Suppr超能文献

旅行前病史决定适当咨询和疫苗接种的可靠性:一项前瞻性研究。

The reliability of pre-travel history to decide on appropriate counseling and vaccinations: a prospective study.

机构信息

Travel Clinic, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Travel Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):284-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2012.00618.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although medical and travel plans gathered from pre-travel interviews are used to decide the provision of specific pre-travel health advice and vaccinations, there has been no evaluation of the relevance of this strategy. In a prospective study, we assessed the agreement between pre-travel plans and post-travel history and the effect on advice regarding the administration of vaccines and recommendations for malaria prevention.

METHODS

We included prospectively all consenting adults who had not planned an organized tour. Pre- and post-travel information included questions on destination, itineraries, departure and return dates, access to bottled water, plan of bicycle ride, stays in a rural zone, and close contact with animals. The outcomes measured included: agreement between pre- and post-travel itineraries and activities; and the effect of these differences on pre-travel health recommendations, had the traveler gone to the actual versus intended destinations for actual versus intended duration and activities.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-five travelers were included in the survey, where 188 (52%) were males (median age 38 years). In 81(23%) travelers, there was no difference between pre- and post-travel history. Disagreement between pre- and post-travel history were the highest for stays in rural zones or with local people (66% of travelers), close contact with animals (33%), and bicycle riding (21%). According to post-travel history, 125 (35%) travelers would have needed rabies vaccine and 9 (3%) typhoid fever vaccine. Potential overprovision of vaccine was found in <2% of travelers. A change in the malaria prescription would have been recommended in 18 (5%) travelers.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-travel history does not adequately reflect what travelers do. However, difference between recommendations for the actual versus intended travel plans was only clinically significant for the need for rabies vaccine. Particular attention during pre-travel health counseling should focus on the risk of rabies, the need to avoid close contact with animals and to seek care for post-exposure prophylaxis following an animal bite.

摘要

背景

尽管旅行前访谈中收集的医疗和旅行计划被用于决定提供具体的旅行前健康建议和疫苗接种,但尚未评估这种策略的相关性。在一项前瞻性研究中,我们评估了旅行前计划与旅行后病史之间的一致性,以及这对疫苗接种建议和疟疾预防建议的影响。

方法

我们前瞻性地纳入了所有未计划参加团队旅行的同意的成年人。旅行前和旅行后的信息包括目的地、行程、出发和返回日期、是否可获得瓶装水、骑自行车计划、是否在农村地区停留以及是否与动物密切接触等问题。测量的结果包括:旅行前和旅行后行程和活动之间的一致性;以及这些差异对旅行前健康建议的影响,如果旅行者实际前往的目的地、实际停留时间和活动与计划中的目的地、停留时间和活动不同。

结果

共有 365 名旅行者参与了这项调查,其中 188 名(52%)为男性(中位年龄 38 岁)。在 81 名(23%)旅行者中,旅行前和旅行后病史没有差异。旅行前和旅行后病史之间的差异最大的是在农村地区停留或与当地人接触(66%的旅行者)、与动物密切接触(33%)和骑自行车(21%)。根据旅行后病史,125 名(35%)旅行者需要接种狂犬病疫苗,9 名(3%)旅行者需要接种伤寒疫苗。发现旅行者中潜在的疫苗过度供应不到 2%。在 18 名(5%)旅行者中,可能需要改变疟疾处方。

结论

旅行前病史不能充分反映旅行者的实际活动。然而,实际旅行计划与计划旅行计划之间的建议差异仅在狂犬病疫苗的需求方面具有临床意义。旅行前健康咨询中特别需要关注狂犬病的风险,避免与动物密切接触,并在被动物咬伤后寻求暴露后预防治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验