Endocrinology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Campinas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012 Aug;67(8):945-54. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(08)15.
Although fine-needle aspiration cytology is considered to be the reference method for evaluating thyroid nodules, the results are inaccurate in approximately 10-30% of cases. Several studies have attempted to predict the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules based on age, nodularity, thyrotropin values, thyroid autoimmune disease, hot/cold nodule status, and ultrasound parameters. However, no consensus has been found, and none of these parameters has significantly affected patient management. The management of indeterminate thyroid nodules and re-biopsies of nodules with initially benign cytological results remain important and controversial topics of discussion. The Bethesda cytological system and several studies on the use of molecular markers to predict malignancy from cytological samples of thyroid nodules need further clarification. More in-depth discussions among and continuous education of the specialists involved in treating thyroid disease are necessary to improve the management of these patients. This review aims to examine the clinical, laboratory, ultrasound, and scintigraphic parameters that can be used for thyroid nodule management.
虽然细针穿刺细胞学检查被认为是评估甲状腺结节的参考方法,但在大约 10-30%的病例中,其结果并不准确。几项研究试图根据年龄、结节性、促甲状腺激素值、甲状腺自身免疫性疾病、热/冷结节状态和超声参数来预测甲状腺结节的恶性风险。然而,尚未达成共识,而且这些参数都没有对患者的管理产生显著影响。不确定甲状腺结节的处理和最初细胞学结果为良性的结节再次活检仍然是重要且有争议的讨论话题。贝塞斯达细胞学系统和几项关于使用分子标志物从甲状腺结节细胞学样本预测恶性肿瘤的研究需要进一步澄清。需要在治疗甲状腺疾病的专家之间进行更深入的讨论和持续的教育,以改善对这些患者的管理。本文旨在检查可用于甲状腺结节管理的临床、实验室、超声和闪烁扫描参数。