Department of Neuroscience, Section of Physiotherapy, Uppsala University, Box 593, BMC, Uppsala S-75124, Sweden.
Phys Ther. 2013 Jan;93(1):50-9. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120123. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
There is ambiguity about what measures to use to best identify physical activity and sedentary behavior, and agreement between methods for measuring physical activity and sedentary behavior in people with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and obesity has not been evaluated.
The objective of this study was to examine the level of agreement between an accelerometer and a self-report questionnaire (International Physical Activity Questionnaire [IPAQ]) or a logbook for measuring time spent on moderate to vigorous physical activity and time spent sedentary in people with OSAS and obesity.
This prospective study was a psychometric evaluation of agreement between measurement methods.
Thirty-nine people who were obese (body mass index: X=36.1 kg/m², SD=4.35) and had moderate to severe OSAS (apnea-hypopnea index of ≥15) were consecutively recruited from a sleep clinic in Sweden. All were treated with continuous positive airway pressure and were waiting for a follow-up sleep evaluation.
Agreement between the measurement methods was limited. For physical activity, the mean difference between the accelerometer and the IPAQ was 47 minutes, and the mean difference between the accelerometer and the logbook was 32 minutes. Agreement was limited for sedentary time as well; the mean difference between the accelerometer and the IPAQ was 114 minutes, and the mean difference between the accelerometer and the logbook was 86 minutes.
The small sample size may affect the interpretation and generalizability of the results.
The results imply that the methods cannot be used interchangeably. A combination of an accelerometer and a daily logbook seems to provide a detailed description of physical activity and sedentary behavior.
对于如何选择最佳指标来识别身体活动和久坐行为,目前尚存在一定程度的不确定性,并且对于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)和肥胖患者的身体活动和久坐行为测量方法之间的一致性,尚未进行评估。
本研究旨在检验加速度计与自我报告问卷(国际体力活动问卷 [IPAQ])或日志本在测量 OSAS 和肥胖患者中中等至剧烈体力活动时间和久坐时间方面的一致性。
这是一项关于测量方法之间一致性的前瞻性研究,属于计量学评估。
从瑞典的一家睡眠诊所连续招募了 39 名肥胖(体重指数:X=36.1kg/m²,SD=4.35)且患有中重度 OSAS(呼吸暂停低通气指数≥15)的患者。所有患者均接受持续气道正压通气治疗,并等待随访睡眠评估。
测量方法之间的一致性有限。对于身体活动,加速度计与 IPAQ 的平均差值为 47 分钟,加速度计与日志本的平均差值为 32 分钟。对于久坐时间,一致性也很有限;加速度计与 IPAQ 的平均差值为 114 分钟,加速度计与日志本的平均差值为 86 分钟。
样本量小可能会影响结果的解释和推广。
研究结果表明,这些方法不能互换使用。加速度计和日常日志本的组合似乎可以更详细地描述身体活动和久坐行为。