Toy Şeyma, Çiftçi Rukiye, Şenol Deniz, Kizilay Fatma, Ermiş Hilal
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Karabük University, Karabük, Turkey.
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Inönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
Iran J Public Health. 2021 May;50(5):919-926. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6109.
We aimed to compare the physical activity, kinesiophobia, and fatigue levels of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients and healthy individuals in terms their somatotypes.
A total of 165 individuals were enrolled referred to the Department of Chest Diseases Sleep Disorders Center Outpatient Clinic of Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey in 2018. The somatotype analysis was conducted using the Heath-Carter method, the fatigue level was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) fatigue scale, the kinesiophobia level was assessed using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), and the physical activity level was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
The results of the somatotype analysis revealed 3 different somatotypes in the healthy individuals and the OSAS patients' mesomorph endomorph, endomorphic mesomorph, and mesomorphic endomorph. When comparing the somatotypes of the healthy individuals and the OSAS patients, statistically significant differences were found in the FACIT scores of the mesomorph endomorphs, the IPAQ and FACIT scores of the endomorphic mesomorphs, and the TSK and FACIT scores of the mesomorphic endomorphs (<0.05).
In all three somatotypes of the OSAS patients, the fatigue index scores were higher when compared to those of the healthy individuals. Moreover, when compared with the healthy individuals, the physical activity levels of the endomorphic mesomorphs with OSAS were low, while the kinesiophobia scores of the mesomorphic endomorphs with OSAS were high. Based on the results of this study, in OSAS patients, the endomorphic mesomorph somatotype could be a risk factor for reduced physical activity, while the mesomorphic endomorph somatotype could be a risk factor for increased kinesiophobia.
我们旨在比较阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)患者和健康个体在体型方面的身体活动、运动恐惧和疲劳水平。
2018年,共有165名个体被纳入土耳其马拉蒂亚伊诺努大学胸科疾病睡眠障碍中心门诊。使用希思 - 卡特法进行体型分析,使用慢性病治疗功能评估(FACIT)疲劳量表评估疲劳水平,使用坦帕运动恐惧量表(TSK)评估运动恐惧水平,使用国际身体活动问卷(IPAQ)评估身体活动水平。
体型分析结果显示,健康个体和OSAS患者中有三种不同的体型,即中胚层 - 内胚层型、内胚层 - 中胚层型和中胚层 - 内胚层型。比较健康个体和OSAS患者的体型时,中胚层 - 内胚层型的FACIT评分、内胚层 - 中胚层型的IPAQ和FACIT评分以及中胚层 - 内胚层型的TSK和FACIT评分存在统计学显著差异(<0.05)。
在OSAS患者的所有三种体型中,与健康个体相比,疲劳指数得分更高。此外,与健康个体相比,患有OSAS的内胚层 - 中胚层型个体的身体活动水平较低,而患有OSAS的中胚层 - 内胚层型个体的运动恐惧评分较高。基于本研究结果,在OSAS患者中,内胚层 - 中胚层型体型可能是身体活动减少的危险因素,而中胚层 - 内胚层型体型可能是运动恐惧增加的危险因素。